• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Conflict between Europeans and Aborigines in Van Diemen's Land

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the conflict between the Europeans and the Aborigines in Van Diemen's Land. To discuss the conflict between Europeans and Aborigines in Van Diemen's Land it may serve first to establish the basis on which the Europeans came to settle in Australia and claim the land as their own. A country may gain land by conquest, cession or settlement.1 To gain land by conquest, one country wages war against the inhabitants of the land which they wish to take, and the winner of that war holds the land. Cession simply means that the land is given or sold to others. A country gains land by settlement on the basis of Terra Nullius, which means 'land belonging to no-one.' Australia ostensibly became part of the British Empire in 1770 when Captain James Cook claimed the land on the basis that it was Terra Nullius, and a British colony was subsequently established at Botany Bay in 1788, therefore claiming the land by settlement. The notion that Australia was Terra Nullius when claimed by Britain was subsequently over-ruled by The High Court of Australia in the case of Mabo v Queensland (No 2), [1992] HCA 23.2 Van Diemen's Land (later renamed Tasmania) was settled by the British in 1803 at Hobart Town.3 Historians are clearly divided on the subject of conflict between the Europeans and the Aborigines and, to gain a balanced view on the subject, it is necessary to establish the basis of this debate in the present day. ...read more.

Middle

It would seem somewhat inevitable that pressure on their culture and their existence would lead to a change in the attitude of the Aborigines to the Europeans and this is recorded by Governor Arthur: "Over a substantial period of time they had evinced a growing spirit of hatred, outrage and enmity against the settlers" 19 The inevitability of war between the Europeans and the Aborigines in Van Diemen's Land is supported by historian Henry Reynolds who writes 'Hence the meeting of the white and Black races in Australia, considered generally, results in war.'20 The period from 1824 through to the early 1830's saw what is generally termed the 'Black War' between the Aborigines and the settlers. While there had long been occasional attacks on Europeans by Aborigines an increased number of attacks from 1824 lead to the introduction of martial law in Van Diemen's Land, lasting from November 1828 to January 1832.21 What this meant to the Aborigines was that the military conducted small scale operations against them and had the authorisation to arrest or shoot any Aborigine on sight.22 Further to this, a bounty of five pounds for adults and two pounds for children was introduced in 1830.23 Some Europeans saw Aboriginal attacks on settlers to be '...the result of their inherent "wanton and savage spirit."'24 This explanation may not explain an increase in attacks, however, an Aboriginal leader, Umarrah, is reported to have stated that murders of settlers had occurred because of the Aborigines ...read more.

Conclusion

of what is considered to be the start of the killing of the Aborigines of Van Diemen's Land: the 'Risdon Massacre' of 1804. The death toll from this 'Massacre' is put at three by Windschuttle, with an explanation given for reports of 'up to fifty' dead.43 The History Wars between historians in the present day may be seen as an indication of how the fact and details of history can become altered over time and in this case perhaps distorted in some misguided attempt at providing a suitable picture of the past. In the case of Van Diemen's Land the how and why of history may have been altered or misused but the tragic outcome for the Aborigines cannot be denied. It would appear that the two cultures, European and Aboriginal were incompatible. Culture would seem to encompass not just how the inhabitants (settler or indigenous) use the land but the attitudes of the inhabitants to others. Neither culture appeared to be either willing or able to come to a suitable accommodation when it was needed and before it was too late, so there appears to be a strong case to argue that the destruction of one society by another was inevitable. The events following the settlement of Van Diemen's Land in 1803 appear to leave little doubt that, all disputes amongst historians aside, the entire full-blooded Aboriginal population was destroyed due to either violent conflict or neglect of their interests in one way or another. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Charles Perkins and the Austarlian Freedom Rides for Aboriginal Equality

    The news coverage and media decimated the Australian smugness and ignorance that racism did not exist in Australia. At all times, they ensured that reports of their demonstrations and local townspeople's responses were available for news broadcast on radio and television.

  2. Analyse various representations of Arthur, from the earliest times to recent scholarship.

    the portrayal of Arthur, as the 'ancient book' Geoffrey supposedly sourced his writings has not yet been found, and archaeological evidence is yet to wrongly prove any of his heroic claims of Arthur. Despite this, it is widely accepted that Geoffrey's purpose, association with Oxford, and intended audience had a

  1. Arab-Israeli Conflict

    The Palestinians were furious that their land could be taken away from them with such ease and wanted it all back, while the Israelis were out to get as much as they possibly could. War broke out as surrounding Arab countries also invaded in the hopes of taking the land back - but to no avail.

  2. Research Topic: Health Welfare of elderly in Shanghai

    This statistics shown above tally with our research article where it states that that Shanghai would be the first city in China to face the problem of ageing population. Therefore we can see that these 2 researches have a common point among them.

  1. Native Genocide

    * The English landed in Plymouth In Massachusetts in 1920. If not for the aid received from friendly natives of the New World, the Englishmen would probably have starved to death. They shared corn with them from the tribal stores, showed them where and how to catch fish, and got them through the first winter.

  2. Taranaki land wars

    They realised too late that the unrestricted arrival of Pakeha to the land was bad. The final straw was when Manukau sold Waitara(Peka Peka Block) to the settlers. War was the best means forward. On February 22, 1860 Browne declared martial law in Taranaki and days later completed the dead for the disputed land the PekaPeka block.

  1. WW1 - technology and trench warfare.

    A soldier told of the rats in the first world war by saying "The rats here are particularly repulsive, they are so fat - the kind we call corpse rats. They have shocking, evil, naked faces, and it is nauseating to see their long, nude tails.

  2. Arab-Israeli Conflict

    These actions led to war in 1956. The British and French attacks on Egypt were met by angry protests from around the world, and their humiliation led to Nasser popularity increasing amongst the Arabs, and Nasser now had a united Arab nation at his command. The crushing defeat which the Arabs endured meant that Nasser was even

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work