• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do sources B & C support the evidence of source A about the reasons for US involvement in South Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...


Do sources B & C support the evidence of source A about the reasons for US involvement in South Vietnam? Source A tells us that the reasons for the USA becoming involved in Vietnam were mainly because of the threat from communism which can be better explained through the Domino Theory. This was the idea that the countries of South East Asia were closely linked together and if one fell to communism the theory was that the others would also fall, like a row of dominoes. Source A says that Vietnam was important as a free country and its economy was essential that to of South East Asia. ...read more.


Sources A and B support each other as source A is written by Kennedy, US Senator and source B by the State Department. They are both part of the USA government which possibly leads to bias. Both see the US involvement as a battle against the communists and tried to appeal to the US people to support this. Kennedy's ideas were very similar to that of the State Department. The Americans made it clear they would fight because they were a strong enemy of communism and that was their main reason. Both sources were written at about the same time. However source C doesn't support the evidence in source A. ...read more.


They were persuaded to volunteer by the saying 'ask not what your country can do for you but ask what you can do for your country' and as war is always attractive to young men it was easy to get volunteers. Being a fighter in the war he took a much more down-to-earth view of the war, he felt their mission was not to save democracy but to kill as many Vietcong as possible. He tells us that the US officers were given body count targets of dead Vietcong. Sources A and B are both involved in the US government so they share the same views. C is by a fighter from the war, he sees what's happening in the war better than the US government and therefore has a different view. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Escalation of American involvement in Vietnam

    The other US methods, like "Search and destroy" or the use of "Agent Orange" chemicals were proved to be useless as well, since it not only took lives of South Vietnamese people, but also made US very unpopular within the peasants of South Vietnam.

  2. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    This quote states that media did not have an influence on the course of the war. However I find this source quite limited as it is quite hard to understand how it is possible to measure the effect of 'negative media' on anyone and would be very interested to know how they came to this conclusion.

  1. John Keegan, a modern military historian suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    that there wasn't a 'better man for the job' an also a German officer called the battle field 'a muddy German grave' all this shows Haig in a better light however he says that 'Haig's numerous mistakes contributed to half a million casualties' Warburton gives a fair account but seems

  2. Australia's Involvement in the Vietnam War

    and SEATO (ANZUS members and several other countries). Members of these treaty organizations meant that these countries would support each other in both foreign and domestic threats. French involvement in Vietnam ended in 1954 with the signing of a truce in Geneva.

  1. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    Haig was warning the public, he was very honest in telling people this, which is why he was so liked. This part of the source does not talk about Haig's skill or efficiency as a soldier but it might help morale and that would help Britain to victory so it

  2. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    suggests that only the media's exposure of crimes against Humanity and other horrific incidents is sufficient enough to allow the press to force an early end to a conflict. Source F is a written text by the American journalist Richard Hamer that attempts to explain the difficulties the Americans and South Vietnamese faced in fighting a guerrilla war.

  1. How useful are sources A to C in helping to explain why the United ...

    we are not given another point of view from which we can form an opinion which is not biased. The source does show feeling in terms of desperation but this feeling would not have been portrayed when President Johnson was giving the speech.

  2. Why were there different reactions in the US

    There was also a change in attitude because the truth about the fighting in Vietnam had been revealed e.g. the US used chemical weapons such as Napalm which had horrific effects on its victims, or defoliants that caused deformities and cancer in a generation of children.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work