• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6

Do these sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

f) Study ALL the Sources. Do these sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable? Sources A to E all suggest different things. There is evidence to suggest that prohibition looked like it would succeed particularly at the beginning and in rural areas. Leading up to the introduction of prohibition there was allot of support for it and many thought it would be the end to poverty problems. Rural areas were not big drinkers and prior to prohibition over half the states had already turned 'dry'. Prohibition looked promising and there was plenty of evidence to suggest the success of it. However the real truth and fundamentals of the cause was society's unwillingness to except prohibition; alcohol had been part of the culture especially urban culture for years. Changing social values were also happening at this time as industrial urbanization made people feel more liberated and more and more immigrants were flocking to America. If people didn't want to abide by the law now was the time that they were more likely to rebel as they felt like they had more freedom and confidence than ever before. Due to this, prohibition became more and more likely to fail towards the end of the decade as industrialization grew, so did people's knowledge and general management and as immigrants flocked so came their need and knowledge of alcohol. When people found a way around the law prohibition came very unlikely to succeed particularly in the urban areas where most immigrants lived and industrialization had more influence. ...read more.

Middle

Source E also agrees that "a vast army of lawbreakers have appeared", and then goes on further to say "respect for the law has been greatly lessened" emphasising on people's unwillingness to except this new law. Although this does appear to be very true this evidence is not entirely reliable as Rockefeller was trying to justify his reasons for his change in opinion of prohibition. He also was based in a large city where drinking was more available and on a greater demand than rural parts of America. A final determination for the inevitable failure of prohibition was that the law was going against the daily habits and customs of Americans. Due to a large scale flock of immigrants to America in the last 50 years, to many people like the Jews and the n***o population, drinking was not a sign of moral weakness but part of their culture and way of living. The influx of immigrants meant a growth in cities and in 1920 a census revealed that the USA was predominantly urban for the first time. This resulted in the tension between the rural and the urban states. The saloon was at it's greatest in cities with support from the Catholics and immigrants meant it had a great influence even if widening the divided between catholic and protestant, immigrant and native and the urban and rural states. Source B supports this in the sense that drinking was taking place mainly in cities; "by 1928 there was more than 30,000 'speakeasies' in New York", the source also mentions that made illegal drinking possible simply "supply a public demand". ...read more.

Conclusion

It would be hard to say whether prohibitions failure was inevitable as both arguments have their strengths. Prohibition looked promising prior to its introduction and certainly in the rural areas of America as over 50% of the states had gone 'dry' before anyway. However it was not taken into account of how the growing urban areas would take the new law. Social values were changing with the kick off of the roaring twenties as the liberation of women, new immigration and industrial urbanisation channelled Americans into the confidence of their newly found buoyancy. Perhaps prohibition would have succeeded if these traditional values had not been obscured, because all of the discussed issues are symptomatic of the fundamental cause being the change in Americans attitude and unwillingness to accept this law. However, because of this prohibitions failure only became obvious after the initial stage of prohibition, therefore not making it inevitable from the beginning. The 18th amendment did become inevitable to failure within the first few years of prohibition and certainly after 1925, as the law just was not being enforced and other crimes and an attitude of lawlessness has spun off it. Many US cities became more drunken, violent and corrupt than ever before, worsening the problems prohibition was supposed to solve. Prohibition may not have been inevitable to fail right from its launch, but after the first few years it was clear that it certainly would fail in the urbanised states of America. ?? ?? ?? ?? Chloe Graham ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    Source C shows a man spending all his money on alcohol while his wife and child are at home with no food. The caption above the wife and child reads 'the saloon is well named the poor man's club as it keeps its members and their family always poor'.

  2. The USA

    Their father was also spending all his time and money in the saloon, drinking alcohol. And not doing what he is supposed b doing, such as providing foods, clothes and shoes for his children. They are both only saying the negative obsessions alcohols not Prohibition; therefore they do not support the view that Prohibition was certainly going to fail.

  1. The Roaring Twenties

    This favoured people who already have immigrants from their country already in USA. In 1924, further restrictions on immigration were put in place in the form of National Origins Act. The 3% was reduced to 2% and the year of residency was moved back to 1890.

  2. Do these sources support the view that the failure of prohibition was inevitable?

    go to the speakeasy rather than the saloon, ignorant to the fact it was a crime. As well as this he says "a vast army of lawbreakers has appeared; many of our best citizens have openly ignored prohibition; respect for the law has been greatly lessened" and if there is

  1. Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This ...

    The child wants to go inside but he is too young and can't. He mother also does not want the child to go in and see his daddy drunk. The sentence that finishes of the title is using the same method as source C.

  2. Study sources C and D Were the artists of these two posters for ...

    But the amount seized did increase dramatically. This Source does not prove that prohibition was successful because there is no mention of the exact amount that there actually was.

  1. Does the evidence of source C support the evidence of sources A and B ...

    Source C is only a general photograph; not taken to show the poverty in Jarrow as the men don't look like they are suffering. In this case source C does not support source A. Source C is not reliable as we do not know why it was taken or who

  2. History - Prohibition

    This point is echoed in the image in the bottom right hand corner "The saloon is well named "The poor man's club" it keeps its members and their families always poor". This image is distressing and is aimed at gaining the support for prohibition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work