Doomed to failure from the start. How far do you agree with this assessment of the Provisional Governments chances in 1917?

Authors Avatar by jacoel (student)

‘Doomed to failure from the start.’ How far do you agree with this assessment of the Provisional Government’s chances in 1917?

The provisional government was set up in March 1917, due to the failure of the Romanovs. After such a long and unsuccessful leadership with Nicolas II. It was exceptionally hard shoes to fill. However, there were more problems to be seen.

The establishment of the Petrograd Soviet meant that the Provisional Government was doomed to failure because they were being undermined. The Petrograd Soviet was made up of soldiers, sailors and workers. Together they wanted to be treated fairly, the end of the war and the elections; which were 9 months away, to be brought forward. Furthermore, they developed an order, named number 1. Which indicated that the soldiers, sailors and workers would only work with the consent of the Petrograd Soviet and not take commands from the Provisional Government. This act limited the Governments actions and enabled lower class Russian citizens to have a say in matters.

Join now!

The arrival of Lenin meant that the Provisional Government was doomed to failure because they lost support. Lenin returned from Switzerland, with a new slogan; ‘Peace, Bread, Land.’ Everything Russian lower classes lacked. He also wanted the war to stop and wanted the power to go to the Soviets. Doing this Lenin, received all of his credit back, and was seen then on as a possible contender to being leader. This putting pressure on the Provisional Government.

The continuation of the war and the June Offensive meant that the Provisional Government was doomed to failure because they once again lost ...

This is a preview of the whole essay