how did protestant politicians explain social economic and political differences between catholics and protestants

Authors Avatar

How did Protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholic and Protestant?

The government in Northern Ireland has been mainly protestant since 1922 when the parliament was set up. There were two types of politicians… those who were extremist like Reverend Ian Paisley and those who were more moderate like O’Neill [from the Ulster Unionist party]; although both believed that Catholics wanted to become more powerful and end the discriminations they claimed took place against them. Catholics suffered many social, economic and political differences like lower quality education, unfair job and housing allocation and virtually no support in the government to help them in their struggle for equality.

Join now!

Politicians blamed that the differences between Catholics and Protestants had been brought about by some historical events such as the plantation schemes, Cromwell’s invasion, the Battle of Boyne and the great famine to show how cruel and unjust Catholics were; The Protestants also proved that Catholics were “lazy and untrustworthy traitors who would use terrorism to achieve a united Ireland”. Catholics had therefore become poor because of their laziness in comparisation to the traditional protestant work ethic. The government tried to explain the unjust council-housing allocation and the difference in employment by saying that protestants were more loyal than ...

This is a preview of the whole essay