How did Protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholics and Protestants?

Authors Avatar

How did Protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholics and Protestants?

Protestant politicians tried to explain the differences between Catholics and Protestants in terms of political, religious and cultural differences. Politicians like Ian Paisley had very extreme views on why these differences existed. Whilst others, like Terence O’Neill, who was a Protestant, were willing to improve things for the Catholics.

Many Protestant politicians thought that local elections were carried out fairly, and that the Catholics did not face any political discrimination, which was hardly thetrue situation. The fact that some Nationalist councillors were elected was used as proof of this. Ian Paisley thought differently, he thought that Catholics were not interested in the politics as their loyalty was with Rome and with their Head of Church, the Pope. He thought therefore that they could never be loyal to the government of Ulster; he therefore labelled them as ‘traitors’. Gerrymandering was done to stop these so-called traitors from entering local councils where they would probably betray the people of Ulster. It was also believed that if Catholics had a greater voice in politics they would make their own laws similar to those in the Republic. This had happened before in the South when for example, divorce was banned in 1925. A source tells us how much the Catholic Church interfered. The source is that of Stanley Mawhiinney, in Darkest Ireland, European Missionary Fellowship and it states that “the Roman Catholic Church is undoubtedly the government force in Eire today..” Not all politicians felt this way, Terrence O’Neill, for example, even being a Protestant realised that the political differences was not simply about their supposed allegiance to Rome. He admitted that the elections system were in favour of the Protestants and that it was unfair to the majority of Catholics. This is why he later introduced amendments to change it.

Politicians like Ian Paisley assumed that the RUC, the courts and the B’Specials did not treat the Catholics unfairly. They claimed that the Catholics were treated more severely because they committed more serious crimes. Because of the Catholics loyalty to the South and the Catholic Church, the Protestants had to be vigilant and cautious. They claimed that there were more Protestant judges and magistrates because when the Catholics were offered these jobs they had just refused. Basil Brooke, the Unionist Prime Minister of Northern Ireland 1943-1963, believed that the Catholics posed a threat to the security of Ulster. This is what he said about the country “Our country is in danger. No surrender. We are king’s men” and he also said “97% of Catholics are disloyal and disruptive”. This was his opinion about the Catholics.

Most Protestants believed that the Catholics were concentrated in the low skill, low pay jobs because they were not well educated unaware of the fact they had equal opportunities as the Protestants to go to grammar schools and universities. But this was not the reality because the government spent more money on resources for the Protestants and almost always neglected the Catholics, which is why the Catholics were most unlikely to go to university. Some of the politicians even thought that the Catholics were naturally lazy or laidback and did not want to work hard, but this was just the Protestants opinion on why the Catholics did not have high skill, high pay jobs. This seems to be a bit one-sided and biased. But in fact it was a cover up for the discrimination the Protestants gave to the Catholics. They blamed the Catholics for every aspect of life and most probably to cover up their unfairness. Other politicians said that the Catholics did have good jobs and were not discriminated against at all. The talk of discrimination against the Catholics was seen as Catholic fiction.

Join now!

Politicians like Ian Paisley admitted that there were differences between the Protestants and the Catholics but he said that these differences were vital and necessary to maintain the side of the Protestant majority. This meant that it was a case of loyalty. He enthusiastically encouraged businesses to employ Protestants in favour of Catholics. A quote from The Battle for Northern Irleand, 1972 states that “the postal services and telephone links in the Maiden City (Londonderry) were virtually controlled by Republicans… to retain them was national suicide as police messages were relayed to the rebel forces.” Basil Brooke also shared ...

This is a preview of the whole essay