• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Important was the Role of the BEF in the Failure of the Schlieffen Plan?

Extracts from this document...


26th September 2003 Ewan Miller Y2 How Important was the Role of the BEF in the Failure of the Schlieffen Plan? Introduction: The Role of the British Expeditionary Force (the B.E.F.) was an in important contributing factor to the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, but not the only one. The French's Plan XIV, the out of date Schlieffen plan itself, and the role of the Belgian army all were contributing factors that together resulted in the failure of Germany's Schlieffen Plan. The Background: Germany had anticipated war for a long time, and in 1905 the German Chief of Staff, Alfred von Schlieffen devised a short, decisive plan to win it. The biggest problem with Germany's location was that it was in between France and Germany. In a European war, the Germans knew they could not, and so would have to avoid, dividing their forces and fighting a war on two fronts. Consequently, von Schlieffen's plan counted on Russia's inability to mobilise - he estimated it would take them 6 weeks to do so. Thus, to avoid a war on two fronts, the Schlieffen Plan meant 90% of the German army would cross rapidly through neutral Belgium, and like a scythe advance through northern France past the French army and fortifications on the French/German border, and take Paris and the French army from behind. After France's defeat, the German army could march back through Germany to fight Russia. With France gone, von Schlieffen thought the Russians would be both terrified and their morale would be down, and that Russia would be easily crushed. ...read more.


French ordered his five divisions to make defences at the nearby Mons canal. This bought the BEF one day before conflict with the German First army. When the German army, under von Kluck, reached Mons, he ordered a massive offensive through the woods. The British's fantastic marksmanship with rifles led the Germans to believe they were facing machine guns, and after the offensive, von Kluck had achieved nothing. But the BEF had achieved in holding up the German army, and giving the French army time to move and protect Paris. But the BEF could not halt the entire German advance - only the French army could do that, with the French armies retreating, and knowing that the BEF would have to do the same, or face the whole German army on their own, Sir French ordered a retreat. Von Kluck didn't give chase, but instead concentrated on the casualties he had sustained, though ultimately he killed 8,000 of the BEF's rear guard. Sir John French himself recommended to Kitchener, the British War Minister, that the BEF make a full withdrawal to the coast. Kitchener, however, rejected the suggestion and the BEF retreated to meet the French at the Marne. The Battle of the Marne The battle at Marne was one of the most decisive battles in The First World war, not because it resulted in the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, but because it ended in stalemate. The First battle of the Marne was between 6-12th September 1914. ...read more.


The Russians' early mobilisation left the German right flank unprotected, and because of this, when the Germans changed their plan and instead of going around to the west of Paris, they attacked it from the east, where they faced the French army and the BEF they were beaten. The Schlieffen plan ran war on a timetable. If something changed, the rest of the plan would go wrong. The Schlieffen Plan was flawed even when it wasn't out of date 9 years before. It gambled on factors it had no control over, like the BEF. Instead of asking how the plan could fail, maybe we should be asking how could it have worked? The Belgians and BEF slowed the Germans, the early Russian mobilisation weakened them. The French and BEF beat them. All the causes were linked together. The role of the BEF was a very important factor in the failure of the Schlieffen plan for two main reasons. Firstly, the Schlieffen plan had not counted on meeting the BEF at all, and their morale decreased after facing such well trained troops, and the fact that the BEF gave the French army time to stop the German army at Marne. If the BEF weren't there, the Germans, regardless of whether they marched around to the west or straight to the east of Paris, could have taken both it and the French army from behind resulting in the overall success of the Schlieffen plan. In the end, the Schlieffen plan really did fail. It ended up with exactly the opposite it had intended. It ended up with a stalemate and leaving Germany fighting a war on both sides which it would eventually lose. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    The British naval blockade would have been a very good weapon, but it was one that would have taken time to come into force. The failure of the war plans meant that the two sides would just do the same process of tactics over and over again.

  2. Why did the Schlieffen Plan Fail?

    The first reason being the Battle Of The Marne. I think this because the Germans had to dig trenches to stop themselves from losing land and because of their lack of soldiers.

  1. The Failure Of The Schlieffen Plan

    The decision to not go around Paris was fatal as this gave the French army another chance to defend their country. The reason for not going round Paris was because the Germans were running out of supplies this is also a mistake by the high commandment, Finally the Russians mobility was another killer for the Germans.

  2. A stalemate developed on the Western Front as a result of the failure of ...

    The French army that was left from the failed Alsace-Lorraine attack reinforced the French army that was retreating from the Germans. The French General, Joffre, wanted the French to keep fighting, and he rushed remaining troops to the front. Over the four days of the battle of the Marne (5th-9th September)

  1. Explain How The Schlieffen Plan Was Meant To Work

    Russia had mobilised much sooner than the Germans had hoped for. Germany had to move 100,000 of its troops from the western to the eastern front. This weakened the German advance even more in the west. Trains were scheduled to take hauls of German troops back to Germany in order to fight the oncoming Russians.

  2. The role of the Inspector in An Inspector calls.

    Lice would also give the troops a fever it was known as 'trench fever'. Frogs also scattered around the trenches and also were a problem. The worse of the problems was probably the smell of rotten bodies, in the trenches there would be thousands of dead who have rotted away and this brought very foul smells in the trench.

  1. Schlieffen Plan

    Germany started to worry that France might attack them just to get their land back so Germany made good friendship or an alliance with Austria and Russia in 1879, but when disaster struck Austria and Russia were to fall out and Germany were an alliance of Austria, but when Italy joined it was called The Triple Alliance.

  2. Was Belgian resistance the main cause of the failure of the Schlieffen Plan?

    Furthermore, it is known that the Germans were believed to have won the battle of Mons, meaning that it may not have been much of a resistance to their advance. Moreover, the fact that Russia mobilised the army much faster than the Germans initially envisioned meant that Germany had to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work