• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam? Sources A-C gives us some insight into why the USA fought and got involved in Vietnam and reveals a number of reasons about Vietnam. I shall be reviewing each source from which I have stated above. Sources A, B and C. Source A is a primary public speech made by President Johnson (Lyndon Baines Johnson) in April 1965 just one month after the start of 'Operation Rolling Thunder' according to the provenance. This is where he wanted his opinions to be spoken out and heard. In the speech Johnson is saying "We fight in Vietnam because we have a promise to keep". This is a promise regarded and made by Eisenhower when he was President in 1953. Lyndon Johnson wants all the Americans to believe what he is exactly saying and still wants to keep this promise. The Truman Doctrine was mentioned in the speech which was to come and help about communism in 1948 and Johnson wants to stick with this. In 1954, President Eisenhower and JFK started sending "advisers" as first president Kennedy would have wanted. You can see that Johnson is talking in a very religious manner and just maybe a religious when speaking out in the speech. ...read more.

Middle

It's like Lyndon Johnson isn't really bothered and couldn't care less about his people and about the Vietnam War. Johnson is also suggesting that the USA cannot win. It's showing us that Johnson is scared fear of communism taking over the world and that the political consideration "Let's move on, let's go into the North" are just being selfish. We have to be very careful within this speech, as it hasn't been edited o tampered with. If it's all whole trustworthy. Possibly was it taped? As it has been to believed that since President Johnson been president his office was monitored by everything that had been said by recording. But is this really reliable and exactly what U.S. president Johnson really said. As I have stated before it can be edited in various ways making things sound different from what has actually been said. In source C this is a secondary speech of a modern writer interview with Professor Noam Chomsky, an American critic of the war in October 1982 according to the provenance underneath the extract. It's talking about how the USA went to war for political reasons which were to dominate Vietnam. Also to stop South Vietnam about independence. ...read more.

Conclusion

The 'world order' cold was U.S.A think they are democratic and can stop communism. President Johnson when speaking out is saying in other words that we "must" stay in Southeast Asia just like we stayed and did in Europe. In source B this is supposed to be a private and confidential conversation which took place in May 1964 according to the provenance with U.S. President Johnson. Johnson has stated that the U.S. are thick and that they're dumb and not knowledge able to know much about the Vietnam War. "h**l of a lot less". This word/phrase is never spoken out in public. Because it's southern religious Texan and no one ever says the word 'h**l' out at all in public. Nearly all the politicians are saying "Let's move, let's go into the North. Most of the politicians' are selfish and un-considerate. Johnson is saying "I don't think we can fight them then thousand miles away from home. I don't think it's worth fighting for." Johnson also spoke out "This is a terrible thing we are getting ready to do". That it's the fear of communism taking over. But not just taking over the country, by taking over the world. Johnson forgets that in his office anything that is being said is always being taped, no matter what. But is this really reliable and exactly what U.S. president Johnson really said. As this can be edited in many various ways. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. The Vietnam War - why the USA became involved and how the media covered ...

    No longer could the government edit what news of the war the public saw and heard about like they had in World War I and II. This war was uncut and as horrifying as being there yourself. This was one of the main reasons that the American public lost faith in the war and why, ultimately, America lost the war.

  2. This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    This cartoon shows a picture of some poor skinny men breaking the planks the train carriages as they have "great society" written on them and feeding them into the fire to feed the train. The train is called US economy.

  1. Why did the United States become involved in the war in Vietnam?

    America had been historically involved in Vietnam for a large period of time which made it easy for their participation to escalate until they became so entangled that war was the inevitable outcome. The US had supported France in their re-occupation of Vietnam (despite their objects to colonisation)

  2. How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States ...

    Would he also admit to what he had said to the U.S public. Source B is mainly useful for the fact it shows us two sides of the President for example 'What the h**l is Vietnam worth to me' this show a more cruller side to President Johnson and shows

  1. How useful are sources a-c to explain why the United Sates became involved in ...

    President Johnson clearly gives out his feelings and intentions about the war in Vietnam. This source states several reasons for the USA's involvement in Vietnam making it quite useful. Source B is an extract of President Johnson's ideas and thoughts about the war are expressed in a private conversation in May 1964.

  2. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    Most of the criticisms of Haig are from the weakest sources Blackadder and Laffin; these are weakest because they have the most motive to make their evidence biased. There are sources such as Wilson and Hussey that give a neutral view.

  1. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    Therefore it is partly true that this was a 'rookie army' of inexperienced men as the extract says but because the extract only compares the experience of the fighters, this is a simple statement about a more complicated situation. The V.C had fought the Japanese and the French before the

  2. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam

    The Vietminh agreed to a cease-fire, but once again, General Vo Nguyen Giap attempted a strategic attack on the French in Hanoi - however, the French weaponry and naval support made it possible that no matter what the opposition may number, it was clear they would suffice as victor.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work