• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Ireland 1801-1921

Extracts from this document...


How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years 1801-1921? Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders between 1801 and 1921 advanced their causes with varying effectiveness. The 1801 Act of Union which aimed to bind Ireland closer to Britain failed to live up to its high hopes and Ireland's subordination to Britain largely remained. Consequently, Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders from 1801 and 1921 attempted to improve Ireland's constitutional status and enhance the prosperity of life in Ireland. The extent to which Irish leaders were effective is dependant on a range of criteria. Firstly, the influence of beneficial factors outside of the leaders' control must be considered as the leaders may have had external factors helping them to advance their cause whereas other leaders may have had to advance their cause completely of their own accord. Also, the political climate must be analysed because the inherent power of the British government may have ensured some leaders had distinct advantages as different governments had different levels of amenability towards helping Irish change. The extent of change the leaders brought about and the long term effectiveness the Irish leaders had must be considered. Daniel O'Connell, as an Irish Catholic leader, unequivocally advanced his cause extremely effectively up to the passage of the momentous 1829 Roman Catholic Emancipation Act. Indeed, the work of O'Connell and his Catholic Association proved fundamental in the passage of this Act and the extent of change brought about was highly significant. The Act was highly significant as it marked an emphatic turnaround in the position and prospective opportunities to Irish Catholics. Prior to the Act, Catholics were unable to take the necessary oath to become MPs and so were deprived of the right to represent Catholic interests constitutionally. ...read more.


Parnell advanced his Home Rule cause, self-government for Ireland, effectively from 1882 until the rejection of the First Home Rule Bill of 1886. This is because he succeeded in forcing Irish Home Rule to the core of British politics due to his highly effective work in ensuring his IPP held the balance of power for the British government. In essence, Parnell's efforts greatly boosted the prospect of Home Rule as Gladstone introduced a Home Rule Bill largely acceptable to Parnell, to gain his support needed to form a government. Although it could be argued Gladstone had already converted to Home Rule, the fact Parnell manoeuvred the IPP to hold the balance of power would have pressurised him further to go through with a Bill. Parnell's effectiveness gains greater substance due to the emphatic way he promoted Home Rule. This is because of the decisive way in which he directed the course of Irish politics towards Home Rule, through establishing the IPP as the dominant Irish nationalist organisation, subject to his unquestionable authority. Donald MacRaild claims, 'Ultimately, Parnell had always sought to supersede physical force nationalism by his constitutional methods'.4 MacRaild's view is evidently precise, exemplified by the demise of the agrarian agitation Land League and Parnell's creation of the National League in 1882, based on achieving Home Rule constitutionally. MacRaild's comment is pertinent in proving Parnell's effectiveness as it is clear that he was proficient in turning his aims into realities. The fact the IPP held the balance of power in 1885 was down to Parnell's National League as it was indispensable in winning over the Irish classes nationwide to the extent that the Party secured 85 Irish seats out of 103. ...read more.


However, aside from the immediate inevitability of exclusion, Lloyd George evidently gained the upper hand on the Ulster issue through deceiving Sinn Fein into believing a Boundary Commission and his influence would ensure the six counties would fall into the Treaty. This was proven to be a bluff from Lloyd George in the long term and this indicates a slight element of ineffectiveness on the behalf of Sinn Fein simply because they believed this falsity and were outwitted in this part of the Treaty. In conclusion, it is clear that some Irish leaders were more effective than others in advancing their causes. In relation to the conceptual criteria it would appear O'Connell undertook the most effective advancement of Irish Catholic through Catholic Emancipation. O'Connell had no significant factors outside of his control working in his favour and had to tackle a hostile political situation to force Britain to yield to his demands. The fact that the Emancipation Act held great importance for the future of Catholics only further demonstrates his emphatic effectiveness. However, O'Connell's overall effectiveness is let by the disappointing Whig alliance and Repeal campaign. Parnell was effective in the manner he promoted Home Rule to the British government but his effectiveness clearly suffered as the Home Rule Cause was weakened as a result of his role in destroying the IPP's powerful unity coupled with the detrimental response of pro-Unionist Ulster. Sinn Fein's rise to prominence was undoubtedly aided by external factors such as the Easter Rising myth and British mistakes and so its effectiveness is automatically downgraded. Furthermore, the 1921 Treaty appears to have stemmed from the IRA's instigation of war as opposed to Sinn Fein's political efforts. Nevertheless Sinn Fein were effective in negotiating the Treaty that remarkably changed Ireland's constitutional status. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Development of Irish Nationalism 1798-1921

    Irishmen who were treated as terrorists became terrorists. 1918 Conscription crisis There was a brief period of compromise between the nationalists and Sinn Fein when furious nationalists retired from Westminster to go home and lead Irishmen in the fight against conscription should it come.

  2. the Irish question

    In the end only 15 of the ringleaders were actually executed, they became republican martyrs and their example is admired and remembered by extreme Nationalists today. The executions had helped to further the Nationalists cause and glorified their leaders.

  1. "How important was Catholic Emancipation in religion and politics in Englandand Ireland between c1820 ...

    This evidence delineates that "social equality" without the context of religion was what Catholic Emancipation Act wanted to aim towards. People wanted to be accepted and represented without being discriminated just because they were of a different religion. However, in light of protest and support, the Catholic Emancipation Act was duly granted in 1829.

  2. Irish History

    Bernadette Devlin, in source D, pointed out the separate education systems in Ireland at the time; the Catholic teachings of the history of Ireland, and the Protestant teachings of the history of Ireland. Each community had a separate history, every child given a nationalist or unionist viewpoint.

  1. Why was Ireland partioned in 1922?

    This is where the Unionists would live and still be part of the United Kingdom. Then there was the Irish Freestate, where the Nationalists would be able to live with their own government and police force, completely separated from the UK.

  2. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    Nevertheless, he had failed to cause any fundamental changes: the Church of Ireland still collected rents from Catholics and he was unable to achieve Repeal, showing failures with regard the nationalist cause. However, Hoppen argues that this was due to the strong resistance of Peel and because "middle class Catholics were less enthusiastic about Repeal than they were about Emancipation".

  1. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    A particularly large meeting was arranged in 1843 near Dublin at Clontarf which alarmed Peel's government. O' Connell decided to call it off and came under great criticism from Young Ireland for his conservatism. O'Connell therefore advanced his cause more effectively in the 1820's with moderate successes adopting a conservative method which kick-started the whole movement.

  2. The 1913 lockout, 1916 rising, the treaty of 1921 and the causes of the ...

    A letter was forged on Dublin castle paper called "The castle Document". This said that Mc Neill and Irish Volunteers officers would be arrested and that the Archbishop of Dublin would be too. Mc Neill believed it and gave the orders to rebel.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work