Ireland coursework-Part AIreland has had a lot of trouble over the years for many reasons causing major publicity internationally

Authors Avatar

Vicky Shreeve

Ireland coursework-

Part A

Ireland has had a lot of trouble over the years for many reasons causing major publicity internationally. The problems have led to the current situation in Northern Ireland. In this coursework I will be examining what has led to these troubles and what is going on in the present day.

Today Ireland is split in half; the South, Eire, is an independent country with its own government, the North, Ulster, is part of the United Kingdom and is ruled by the British government in London. Northern Ireland has suffered much political violence since 1968. The problems are between the Protestants or Unionists who want N.Ireland to remain part of the UK, and the Catholics or Nationalists who want an independent united Ireland. The Catholics are outnumbered in N.Ireland so were discriminated against and so had a general dislike for protestants, to get their views heard they set up the IRA. This is a terrorist organisation that uses violence to protest for what they want; they have killed hundreds of soldiers, police and civilians. Protestants have also set up terror gangs and carried out many killings. In 1994 a ceasefire was agreed on both sides but in 1996 there were IRA bombings in London and Manchester. Despite this in 1998 more talks were held and agreements were made to stop using terrorism to express their views and start using politics by setting up a devolved government to do so.

The first article I am looking at was printed around the time of the 2005 election. It is about a speech Gerry Adams, the leader of Sinn Fein a nationalist political group, made. He was urging the IRA, a nationalist terrorist group said to be linked with Sinn Fein, to end its “armed struggle” and embrace politics. He said that “in the past I have defended the right of the IRA to engage in armed struggle”, this is why he is said to be linked to them. He is still claiming that what they did was not terrorism and was acceptable; he even praised the IRA’s “determination, selflessness and courage”. He also said they had “faced down a huge military foe, the British crown forces”, who were sent in to control the IRA’s violence. He congratulated them on showing Ulster couldn’t be ruled on Westminster’s terms. However, he made an “address to the IRA” praising their past actions but now claiming that their struggle should “be taken forwards by other means”; he wanted them to “fully embrace and accept this alternative”. However he made a point that it wouldn’t be easy and that splinter groups may be formed, “Those who oppose change are not going to simply roll over”. But he tried to appeal to those people saying that “Our struggle has reached a defining moment”. For the political process to end with “re-unification secured”, republicans “have to set the agenda”.

        Westminster said the speech was “significant and welcome”, but the shadow Northern Ireland spokesman said “trust can only be built on actions not just words”. Ian Paisley, leader of the DUP a unionist political group, was more cynical. He claimed that the speech was just a political stunt and that no real promises had been made about arms decommissioning, police reforms, guaranteeing people’s safety or the IRA’s disbandment. He said that he would not negotiate with Sinn Fein until there was complete IRA disbandment, “And that’s not going to happen,” he said.

        This article suggests that the 1998 peace agreement is in trouble because it is so hard to trust each other after the lack of trust that has built up. Sinn Fein seem to be trying to change things by appealing to the IRA but no real promises have been made. The IRA has agreed to a ceasefire but this was broken in 1996 with the bombings of London and Manchester. Although their terrorist activities have almost stopped the IRA haven’t completely decommissioned their weapons. This is what the unionists want before they will negotiate with Sinn Fein. The unionists say that all terrorism has to stop for politics in a democracy to work. If Sinn Fein has ‘their’ terrorist group the IRA behind them then politics wouldn’t be fair because there would always be a threat if you were to disagree. So the peace agreement is at a standstill until one side gives in, the IRA must fully decommission their weapons or the unionists must agree to trust Sinn Fein and negotiate with them. Both seem very unlikely especially the latter because of the lack of trust that unionists have in Sinn Fein because of the links they have with the IRA. So the more likely solution will be that the IRA decommission their weapons and agree to move forwards politically rather than through terrorism, this is what Gerry Adams is supposedly asking for, so he can start the political process rolling.

These troubles today started a long time ago and I will be looking at the history behind them. A mixture of religious, political and economic events has made the rift between Catholics and Protestants. These have all built up to a lack of trust on both sides. Although various peace agreements have been made, including the most recent in 1998 they can’t work until the trust is reformed. The disagreements between the two sides go back so far it will be very hard for people to reform this trust. Both sides are still very sour about events which they blame on each other for, it is not just the politicians who cannot trust each other, the general public still hold grudges against each other and these will always be there. This recent article just shows how this lack of trust which has built up over the years is affecting the peace agreement today.

A religious incident which has severely added to this lack of trust was Bloody Sunday. It happened on Sunday 30th January 1972 when a civil rights march was taking place in Derry. They were marching against internment, which was the right for British soldiers to raid Catholics homes for firearms and arrest men sending them to internment camps where they were ill treated. As well as introducing internment the unionist government had also banned all marches, making this one illegal. The marches were intending to go to the guildhall through the Catholic Bogside area. However the army wanted to deal with the march in a low key way so put up 26 barriers to contain the marches within the Bogside area. The soldiers that were sent to control the “scoop-up operation to arrest as many hooligans and rioters as possible” were the first battalion of the parachute regiment specialists in fierce attacks, not crowd control.

        The march went peacefully until crowds gathered at the army barriers to protest against the re-routing, stones were thrown and insults shouted at the soldiers. No one is sure of who fired first but the army said; “we came under fire from the bottom of the flats…..we were also petrol bombed, and some acid, in fact, was poured on us from the top of the flats. When we’re fired at, we must protect ourselves.” However the Catholics claimed, “It was a massacre. I saw no one shooting at troops. If anybody had been, I would have seen it.”

Join now!

        It has never been proved which side shot first, but both blame each other. The Protestants felt that they had to control the march and protect themselves. The Catholics were enraged by this incident, seeing it as murder. 13 people were killed, shot at indiscriminately in a crowd so anyone could have been hit. They said they didn’t shoot first and that if they had it was the IRA, so that didn’t give reason for firing into crowds of people, joining in an illegal march didn’t justify the army’s action. After the incident the British took full control of the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay