Northen Ireland Coursework

Authors Avatar

History Coursework Question 2

The events that occurred in Derry on 30th January 1972 known as Bloody Sunday may have produced such different historical interpretations because there were two opposing sides so each side would give a different account bias towards their point of view because they would want people to believe their story.

One of these sides was the people who were on the side of the Soldiers that is they believe they were attacked first. These generally, though not always are either the British or the soldiers themselves. Some of these opinions are shown in source A because it has an interview with a Tory MP and one of the soldiers. The soldier discards the new evidence that was discovered as rubbish. This shows how the soldiers believed that it was not their fault and that they were attacked by the Catholics. They may have different views to everyone else for a variety of reasons, firstly they may not want to admit they were not attacked because they could end up in jail for murder, or because of the atmosphere at the time they may not have been completely focused; they were not trained for dealing with civilians, and so where unsure of what to do. This means that they may have panicked and though that they heard something and thus the firing started. So the soldiers’ accounts may not be very reliable because they were in an different situation to what they normally were and may have been scared. This would mean their account may be affected by emotions. Source A does have some views from the other side but it does not however have any Catholics opinions. This means the source is biased towards the Paras. The Conservative MP that is interviewed in the Source is also on the side of the Soldiers, he says that he has no faith in the inquiry. This shows what most conservative MPs believed, they generally believe that it was a provoked attack. The Conservatives were largely in support for the unionists so it is no surprise they took the side of the soldiers, this means that their views are probably bias and not very reliable. In the aftermath of the troubles the IRA killed two Tory MPs with car bombs, this would have increased there hatred for them making them want to support the soldiers even more. Also a Hotel in Brighton was bombed which killed 2 MPs. Also the MP interviewed in the Paper was based at Aldershot which had the Paras base, so he would not would to lose votes by going against the Paras.  

Join now!

The other side of the story is the side being sympathetic towards the Catholics. This is shown in Source B, another newspaper but this time there is an account from a Catholic and the general feeling of the article is sympathetic towards the Catholics. As this article is from the Guardian which are liberal and socialist who believe in equality and equal right this is not surprising. They would feel that the Soldiers shot victims in cold blood. The language used is very sympathetic to the victims word like “defenceless” are used. So this article is biased towards Catholics ...

This is a preview of the whole essay