Previous attempts to bring peace to Northern Ireland have failed. What problems will need to be over come if the current peace talks are to succeed?

Authors Avatar

Jessica McDonald 01/05/2007

Previous attempts to bring peace to Northern Ireland have failed. What problems will need to be over come if the current peace talks are to succeed?

The troubles in Northern Ireland are fuelled by many problems. Terrorism is a key issue that brings violence and death to the Irish people, this helps keep the fear, anger, distrust and sectarianism stay in the hearts and minds of the Irish people.

Political disputes between the two sides politics doesn’t help solve the problem either. Arguments between the two sides only drag on the current situation and progress is not made. The same consequences appear because of the Republican/ Nationalist Unionist/ Loyalist spilt.

Previous peace attempts have failed like the early Sunningdale Agreement 1973-4 and the more recent Drowning Street Declaration 1993. Problems like decommissioning still exist and the problem won’t be fully achieved until more trust is gained on both sides. Others problems like splinter groups are also a big challenge. As even if main paramilitary are fully decommissioned then splinter groups still exist like the ‘Real’ IRA formed in 1997 a splinter group from the IRA and the Loyalist Volunteer Force formed in 1996 a splinter group from the Ulster Volunteer Force. These splinter groups are thought to be more dangerous and with more of them forming all the time it is an ongoing task to decommission them.

The Downing Street Declaration was an agreement between Prime Minister John Major and Taoiseach Albert Reynolds. The aim was to form a new government for Northern Ireland. They decided that parties could only partake if they rejected terrorism/violence. The Irish government then promised to set up a forum for Peace and Reconciliation to encourage trust and understanding between the two communities. Nationalists welcomed the agreement and thought it was progress towards peace. Though some were still unhappy, as the agreement did not remove the partition. Unionists were reluctant and some wary about the new agreement but accepted it. A few saw it as a step towards the removal of the partition as Republicans were now allowed into government. The agreement didn’t solve everything but it was a step towards the right direction as opposite sides gained more trust of each other. It also showed that politics was the better way forward. Terrorism did get worse in 1994 but a ceasefire was then agreed. Problems didn’t disappear there was still arguments about the partition. Decommissioning was also a problem even though some groups wanted to decommission both sides wanted the other side to do it first. This showed there was still some issues of trust that needed working on. Splinter groups were also a big problem because as some groups started to decommission more splinter groups appeared and were often more violent and dedicated than the original groups they had broken from. Marches now regular events with the Orange Order and AOH caused trouble too. The marches often stirred feelings among the opposite side and provoked more paramilitary attacks.

Join now!

The next attempt towards peace in my lifetime was/is The Good Friday Agreement 1998. The aim was to establish a Northern Ireland Assembly with 108 members. It was decided that all decisions were to require consent of both communities in the province. Then a North-south Council of Ministers was set up. This was made of

Ministers from the Assembly and ministers from the republic. There were a few conditions also made in the agreement. One condition was that the Irish government had to remove Articles 2 and 3 of its constitution. Another requirement ...

This is a preview of the whole essay