• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition. Source A is from an American history book it was published in 1973. Source B is from a book about American history and it was published in 1979. Both sources clearly agree on prohibitions consequences,they clearly agree that after the law

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework a) Source A is from an American history book it was published in 1973. Source B is from a book about American history and it was published in 1979. Both sources clearly agree on prohibition's consequences, they clearly agree that after the law of prohibition organised crime was increased. Source A gives many reasons why prohibition was introduced for example "Bad influences of saloons, preserving grain for food, although I believe the most important reason was "Anti saloon leagues." Both sources A and B both agree that the law of prohibition rapidly increased organised crime. It shows that the more people wanted to drink and people were happy to supply. By 1928 there were more than 30,000 speakeasies in New York. Both sources agree that prohibition led to gangsters and Bootleggers. The only differences between the two sources are source A gives many reasons why prohibition was introduced. Such as "Bad influences of salons." Source B on the other hand only states one reason to why prohibition was introduced. It was because of the Women's Temperance Union. They had joined a crusade to fight alcoholism. Overall sources A and B are both quite similar they both agree that prohibition was a failure. ...read more.


Source G clearly shows that in 1921 there were 9,746 illegal stilts seized and this shows that the actual number could be more because not everyone would have been caught. There was also 414,000 spirits seized. By 1929 there were 15,794 illegal stilts seized, and there were 11,860,000 gallons of spirits seized. This figure is not 100% accurate because of the reason discussed earlier. This is due to some gangsters such as Alphonse Capone they would bootleg alcohol and bribe police so they could bring in illegal alcohol into the country and sell it in speakeasies. Speakeasies were illegal saloons. Source H is from the city of Philadelphia police department, and it shows that the number of arrests for drinking related offences between the years 1920 and 1935 it clearly shows that the statistics prove that there was more crime and illegal alcohol on the streets. These statistics could also be much higher this is because some of the police may have been corrupt and not everyone may have been caught. Another factor is that the statistics about the arrests were only from the state of Philadelphia, In conclusion from these two sources we can clearly see that prohibition was a failure. ...read more.


Source H also proves that prohibition was a great failure instead of less people getting drunk and being arrested for being drunk and committing crime, so this shows that the law was completely ignored and even the superiors were corrupt. Source I also shows that prohibition was a failure, this is because many superior officers were corrupt and had taken bribes, this meant gangsters such as Al Capone, source J supports this it explains how the police were bribed and could not do anything about prohibition. Source J also supports that prohibition was inevitable as it shows a large group of police men, prohibition agents and politicians receiving bribes to allow prohibition to take place. Therefore this strongly supports the fact that prohibition was inevitable as the police officers and prohibition officers were being paid to keep a blind eye towards prohibition. In conclusion some of the sources clearly show that prohibition was inevitable and others support that it was not inevitable. Source I clearly suggests that prohibition was inevitable because a lot of prohibition seniors who should be enforcing the law were taking backhanders. Although source B shows that the numbers of speakeasies were just outnumbering the amount of prohibition agents. ?? ?? ?? ?? Mohammed Moneeb Mr Carrol ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Source D shows a report from the Jarrow Public Health Committee, published in 1933. ...

    This is useful to us because it shows that because of the depression they cannot buy essentials like clothes. Despite what the source tells us about living conditions the source is limited because it is not the whole report, source D only shows part of a report, so you do

  2. Source A and Source B struggle to agree on the causes of prohibition. I ...

    The saloon was never going to give it back and they were to remain poor. Both artists are saying that Prohibition was good. The message is that the families of the men who were addicted to the saloon were the ones who suffered.

  1. USA and the Prohibiton law - 1920

    Also, and following the first point, because of the criminal boom that it created from gangsters who sold and made alcohol illegally. All these arguments raise a debate to whether the failure of prohibition was inevitable or not, many of the sources seem to support this view, however some of

  2. American History Coursework

    This helped them benefit until they could manage to locate further employment. In addition to this, the Federal Emergency Relief Administration was initiated which pioneered the cause of the indigent. A sum of $500 million dollars was exhausted in order to construct edifices such as soup kitchens, employment schemes & nurseries.

  1. Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This ...

    He has no reason to be biased.. As he says "I hoped that it would be widely supported by public opinion and the day would soon come when the evil effects of "alcohol would be recognized. I have slowly and reluctantly come to believe that this has not been the result" This shows how he wanted the

  2. Study sources C and D Were the artists of these two posters for ...

    In 1925, 2,023 still were seized but again it can be a small amount compared to how many exist within the area. The gallons of spirits were the same, however the amount seized was increasing but there was no record about how many gallons there actually were in the area.

  1. GCSE History Coursework

    Source D has a clearer message this is probably due to the fact that by 1915 support for prohibition had grown and more people had become aware of the dangers of alcohol. Both posters show a hatred of alcohol and both artists are for prohibition.

  2. Jarrow source based coursework

    in source D not one does it even mention the great depression and we also do not know why this report is written. Source e is data on death rates and infant mortality rates in Jarrow and nationally published by the Jarrow public health committee.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work