'The Nazi totalitarian state was established at the expense of the German people.' Assess the validity of this statement.

Authors Avatar

'The Nazi totalitarian state was established at the expense of the German people.'  Assess the validity of this statement.

In the 1950/60's historians, such as Allan Bullock, took the view that it was obviously established at the expense of the people.  The Nazi's brutally eradicated anybody who did not conform to their ideas from the Jews to the Trade Unions.  However since this period historians have found that there was a wide compliance with the Nazi state and if it was established at the expense of the people then why was there so much support and even enthusiasm?    

Firstly, the word totalitarian has to be considered.  The process of Gleichshaltung or forcible co-ordination involved the dissolution of the Trade Unions, abolition of the Federal States and on July 14th 1933 the dissolution of the political parties ('Law against the New Construction of Parties'.)  This meant that Germany was a one party state and people lost the freedom to vote.  The Nazi's controlled all aspects of German life through various organisations and force (Gestapo and SS,) however there was still opposition.  It can be argued that Nazi Germany was totalitarian, but not as much as Stalin's Russia.

 Hindenburg's death marked the end of democracy and this was replaced with chaos of conflicting agencies and ministries.  Hitler openly admitted that he had no detailed policies.  There are two conflicting views of Hitler as a dictator both weak and strong.  As a strong leader, a more traditional interpretation, Hitler was seen as making all major decisions 'Hitler was master in the Third Reich,' Rich (Hitler as an intentionalist.)  The opposing view is that Hitler had little involvement in most government directives, allowing others to make decisions and unwilling to do so himself (he was weak, a structuralist.)  Kershaw presents the current view of Hitler arguing that although Hitler was often not involved in decisions, this demonstrates his power.  Hitler was well known for setting the same task to several individuals 'working towards the Fuhrer.'  Hitler's role as Fuhrer is important when looking at the Nazi state and whether it was totalitarian.  

Hitler's basic Economic Policy in 1933 was to reduce the numbers of unemployed, create Autarky, to prepare for war and to create Wehrwirtschaft.  The economic policy was mostly successful; it led to the creation of jobs and a fall in the numbers of unemployed.  By 1934 there was a balance of trade deficit and Schacht devised the New Plan in 1934 to tackle it.  In 1936 Goering became head of the four year plan to rearm.  Tension developed between those who preferred 'butter' (Schacht and industrialists) favouring an economy with more stress on consumer goods and 'guns' (Goering) favouring more stress on rearmament.  The people would be affected by these decisions, both create jobs but in different sectors so not everybody would gain.  The less emphasis on consumer goods, the less comfortable people's lives would be.  Hitler was successful in creating economic stability.

Join now!

Reducing the numbers of unemployed was Hitler's main priority.  When Hitler came to power there were 6 million unemployed in Germany.  June 1st 1933 'The Law to Reduce Unemployment' increased the number of Arbeitdienst (public work schemes,) that by March 1934 gave employment to 630,000 labourers.  1 billion Reichmarks were made available for housing, public building projects, land improvement schemes and autobahns.  The Government increased public expenditure and tried to stimulate consumer demand, the unemployed benefited from the Nazi state.  However there are other reasons why unemployment figures decreased: women, Jews and those in concentration camps were not counted in the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay