• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military supremacy. However, the USA failed to use this supremacy effectively to defeat a smaller less advanced enemy Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military supremacy. However, the USA failed to use this supremacy effectively to defeat a smaller less advanced enemy Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation I agree and disagree with this quote. America was far advanced than the Vietminh and Vietcong. But the way that the communist recovered from there loses and that they had already drove France and Japan out. So there guerrilla tactics did work against stronger opponents. Even though the Americans out numbered and killed more the communist were willing to accept loses because they were fighting to free there country and make it one country, whereas the American public didn't want more and more men to die for a useless cause. Maybe if the public had of stayed on there side America would of won the war. There were around 2.8 million Americans which served in Vietnam. Two million of these men were drafted. So only a small part of the army was professionals and the rest of soldiers were men which may have been against the war and have not experience. 48% of them died in the first 3 months. In total 58,000 American soldiers were killed thought out the war in Vietnam. ...read more.

Middle

But it doesn't say when it was made so we don't know if its a primary or secondary source. However the graph has it its limits of usefulness as it doesn't show how many of the men were drafted into the army and how many were professionals. This source backs up the quote because America had a lot of men in Vietnam had should of won the war. Source B is an account of a napalm attack by the Americans. I think that this source is reliable because it is a primary source an eye witness account and the correspondent is writing for a well respected British newspaper, and Britain aren't fighting in the war so it won't be one sided or biased. Although Britain was friends with America his purpose is to tell the truth about Vietnam to alert Britain. But it is limited there isn't enough information to tell if there was a battle or if the bombing is successful. This also backs up the quote because it shows the technological advantages over the communist in Vietnam. Source C is an extract from a GCSE textbook; it is to inform students doing GCSE history that guerrilla warfare was effective. As the Vietcong fought a guerrilla war in there own country. ...read more.

Conclusion

But Williams view doesn't mean the whole of America thought like that maybe that's just his view on the war. This source proves and disproves the quote because yes they both agree that America are more powerful but the Vietnamese had "history" on there side as they had previously beaten France and Japan in a guerrilla war. And that they were fighting to become one country, whereas America was fighting "nothing". Yes the USA should have been successful in Vietnam because they out numbered, had more firepower and were better trained. But they under estimated the Vietnamese and resourcefulness of them and how they could hit and run and make up for there loses. But the USA didn't use there fire power to there full advantage. If they had continuously bombed the Vietcong maybe they would have surrendered. But they didn't know where the Vietcong bases were and some of the tunnels were really well built and was nearly impossible to destroy. The guerrilla tactics also proved very effective against the American soldiers because they weren't used to fighting in the jungle, and were clumsy and 11% of the men were killed by booby traps. So I agree and disagree with the quote because America should have won the war. But the Vietnamese were suited to the jungle tactics and had already forced out France and Japan previously. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. History Controlled Assesment- Success' of USA military

    Some people believed, the bombing had a hidden reason.... As time passed further, the weaknesses of the US tactic of using large-scale bombing to achieve its objectives became clearer, the US had to be careful not to use too much force as this might tip the USSR or the Peoples Republic of China, into war to support the North Vietnamese.

  2. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    troops were being conscripted and being poorly trained, and the Vietnamese were volunteering and were trained better, and knew their country well enough to take part in guerrilla warfare, I would also like to mention that the US conscripts normally fell below the US army's average and has little understanding

  1. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    that no one else does because being Prime Minister gives privileged access to information. This source is an extract from his war memoirs and he is questioning his own responsibility for the 'slaughter' in the war. He is a politician and he might want to present himself in a good

  2. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    scored so low on the intelligence tests that they would never have been let into the normal peacetime army." This quotation says a 'rising number' but it doesn't mean a majority so there will be some that are well educated.

  1. Why did the USA become involvedin Vietnam in the 1950s and 1960s?

    France was not happy, and asked America for financial aid to help them regain control of Vietnam. America gave France $3billion as part of the Truman Doctrine to help them beat the Vietminh and the threat of communism. The leader of China, Mao Tse Tung, was helping Ho Chi Minh,

  2. Full Metal Jacket: Vietnam

    when sniper who was a girl shot Americans and Americans couldn't kill her but in the training they were told to think Vietnamese as animals and dehumanize them so it was easy to kill them and all the soldiers cared about their partners who got shot by enemies.

  1. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    347 unarmed civilians were killed at My Lai. The angry, agitated men of Charlie Company, 11th brigade, American division entered the village of My Lai on March the 16th 1968. The killing began a short time after. Approximately 347 people including children, women and the elderly were killed.

  2. Full Metal Jacket

    the extensive, and extremely dehumanizing process of training of these youngsters who one day wished to become Marine Corps. Through this process we see that Sgt. Hartman, the drill sergeant, or training instructor for the new recruits, demoralizes his students.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work