• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There was no general war (i.e. one involving all the great powers at the same time) in Europe between 1815 and 1914. Why?

Extracts from this document...


There was no general war (i.e. one involving all the great powers at the same time) in Europe between 1815 and 1914. Why? For the hundred years from 1815 to 1914, Europe was, for the most part, peaceful. This is in marked contrast to the years immediately preceding, and after this period, when all the major states in Europe were embroiled in long, widespread conflict against each other. There are many possible reasons for this protracted period of peace, and indeed how the stability broke and World War One began. The Vienna Settlement, that followed the end of the Napoleonic Wars is generally regarded as one of the most important factors in maintaining peace, but there were quite a few other factors, maybe less significant on there own, but when pieced together all helped to ensure a century of relative peace throughout Europe. These factors included the continuity of leadership throughout the century, the overseas and imperial aims of the European countries and the balance of power that was sustained throughout. The Congress of Vienna was an attempt to ensure that one country, in this case France, could never again wage war on Europe as she has done until her defeat in 1815. After having waged war on a massive scale against Britain, Spain, Russia, Austria, and the Prussians, France was defeated by the victorious powers. ...read more.


The domestic focus of Germany was squarely on unification, and this ensured that Prussia did not look too far beyond her own borders, with the notable exception of the conquest of Alsace and Lorraine from the French in 1871-2. This dispute was a localized affair, and never seriously threatened the international order. The same can be said of the small military entanglements between a number of the states from 1854-70. These wars were short and decisive, ending in defeats for Austria and France.7 Again, the defeated countries maintained their great power status, ensuring a continuing status quo. The stability of France, whose monarchy was restored in 1815, was also significant8 The rulers and leaders of the great powers were also in close contact at this time, and many were indeed related. There were family ties between the monarchies of Russia, Britain and the unified Germany. These rulers regarded the treaties that were signed in this period, as personal, and binding, and it was a matter of personal honour to ensure they were upheld. This "autocratic alliance" served to ensure stability amongst the powers.9 The Nineteenth Century saw many of the European powers look overseas to expand their empires. Africa, the Near and Far East, and parts of Asia were colonised by explorers and missionaries from Britain, France, Germany, and even the smaller nations like Holland and Belgium. ...read more.


It did not unduly punish France, leaving it to seek constant revision, like Germany post Versailles. The success of the Congress of Vienna and the diplomatic situation it provided was surely the most influential factor in giving Europe one hundred years of relative peace. That it not to say however that the other factor did not play apart. Their piece in the jigsaw of the causes of WW1 serve to show us just how important they were in previously maintaining the peace. We have seen that when the other factors started to cause tension, such as overseas expansion, trade, and the failure of one of the major power, the Ottoman Empire, the Vienna settlement was not sufficient on its own to prevent the outbreak of another general European War. I would suggest the other factors served to support the results of the Congress of Vienna, and unfortunately, as we have seen with Versailles, without support, failure is virtually guaranteed. Footnotes 1. Bullen, Roger The Great Powers and the European States System 1815-1914 (Longman, London and New York, 1980), p.2 2. Sked, Alan Europe's Balance of Power 1815-1848 (Macmillan, Basingstoke 1978), p.27 3. Ibid, p.30 4. Ibid, p.32 5. Bullen, Great Powers p.2 6. Sked, Balance of Power p.30 7. Bullen, Great Powers p.8 8. Sked, Balance of Power p.30 9. Bullen, Great Powers p.12 10. Gilbert, Martin History of the Twentieth Century (Harper Collins, London, 2001), p.71 11. Bullen, Great Powers p. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. What where the causes of WW1

    The First Balkan War broke out on 8 October 1912 when Bulgaria, Greece, Montenegro and Serbia having large parts of their ethnic populations under Ottoman sovereignty, attacked the Ottoman Empire, terminating its five-century rule in the Balkans in a seven-month campaign resulting in the Treaty of London.

  2. The Rise of Nation States in Europe

    Belgians needed to help Holland to pay their debts. * As a result, in 1830s, Belgians had a revolution in Brussels and succeeded to separate from Holland. * Belgium overthrew the king, William I of Orange and got independent. They set up their own government and had Louis Philippe to be the leader.

  1. The Long Fuse by Laurence Lafore - Chapter Three: The Europe of the Armed ...

    The agreement was that if one of the three empires went to war, the other two would remain neutral. In addition, Balkan issues could be changed only after consultation.

  2. Cause Behind WW1

    Statements at their trials suggest the killing to have been a symbolic act of protest which, obviously they did not expect to cause a war between Serbia and Austria which helped towards a world war. If the assassins had gone ahead and killed the General instead, might there have not been a war?

  1. Summary of the Situation of Europe in the 1900s

    They had many different people and there was racial tension between the Slavic people. Their empire was soon to be declining and will cause great conflict between the other powers of Europe. They all want the assets of Turkey. From here, Germany has the strongest economy.

  2. The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan Crisis in ...

    This situation was mismanaged by Germany because until then Russia was a not a physical threat. However because she began rebuilding her military she did, by 1914, pose a threat to Germany which was one of the reasons why Germany was eager for war.

  1. This was the general formula of Bismarck's foreign policies meaning "When there are five ...

    In addition Russia like Germany was a conservative monarchy. * Austria-Hungary likewise is a conservative monarchy and would, as an ally, avoid the position of a two-front war besides it's social structure was perhaps the strongest of all and the rule of the dynasty a made it the most favourable of all Alleys.

  2. History Revision notes - International Relations: Why did WW2 break out? 1929-1939

    and also weaken a potential threat. Hitler ordered the leaders of the Czech n**i party to begin making demands for a role in the Czech government. At first the Czech leader made concessions however the Czech Nazis kept increasing their demands, therefore president Benes of Czechoslovakia refused to make further concessions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work