• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using sources, who or what was most responsible for the ending of Apartheid?

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐An effect of the law was to exclude non-Whites from living in the most developed areas, which were restricted to Whites. It caused many non-Whites to have to commute large distances from their homes in order to be able to work. The law led to non-Whites being forcibly removed for living in the "wrong" areas. This can be seen in particular, in Source 2 ? a sign disallowing non-whites to a picnic site. The sign is written in both English and Afrikaners and not the native African languages, which could be indicative of the Afrikaans attitude towards the natives. Also the sign states ?non-whites 3 miles lower down?, forcing them to not share a public area with others. The sign is established by the Department of Forestry, therefore likely a government initiative of the ?Petty Apartheid? policy. The purpose of these was to provide whites with access to the most privileged suburbs, and disenfranchise non-whites politically. This included everyday facilities, such as this sign: ?picnic site[s]?. The area of non-whites ?3 miles lower down? was likely poorly looked after, and degraded. These petty apartheid laws were highly enforced by the police whom were white, and if the blacks opposed, they would be severely attacked. The source is indefinitely reliable because it is raw evidence, presented as a photograph; the sign is from 1950. Thus, it is a first-hand piece of evidence, and cannot have been manipulated. It is also useful on many levels: firstly, it provides us with an insight into how white people thought of non-whites, because it shows how they did not want to affiliate with other races. Furthermore, this area is a nature reserve, and you would expect in such a harmonious place to say, everyone would be able to access this area; therefore this source shows the extent to which white people enforced the apartheid legislation. However, the source does not specifically show the extent to which black people were inhumanely treated, as it only presents that white and non-white people were separated, which after all, was the overarching purpose of the apartheid. ...read more.


Source B6 is an article found in the Times Magazines, with former SA president F.W. de Klerk ? once Nelson Mandela?s enemy - endorsing Mandela as one of the twentieth century?s major figures, in 2005. F.W de Klerk denounces that Mandela was a fundamental cog playing a ?decisive role? to bringing about harmony between all races in South Africa, in spite of the fact that F.W de Klerk was in favour of Apartheid. The content inferences Mandela as achieving the impossible, as initially the text begins saying it was ?unlikely? that races would unite, and Mandela achieved it, despite being sentenced for life in prison. One particular questionable aspect of the text, is that though F.W. de Klerk presents his deepest gratification to Mandela, it could be questioned that this is only being said to reflect positively on himself, otherwise he may be ridiculed for not showing respect. As a past enemy, his outward views would have to change in order to reflect well on himself, and avoid having a bad legacy or name for himself. However, important figure heads have gained Mandela?s attention, showing that Mandela has obviously done major achievements in order to get such accreditations. Furthermore, the article being printed in the ?Times Magazine? a very populous and well established magazine portrays how important and well respected he is in comparison to other people who helped stop the Apartheid. Many feel that F.W. De Klerk was a major instigator towards the ending of the Apartheid. Source B9 states the main actions to get rid of the ?main props of the racist Apartheid?, including removing the ban on the ANC movement, and freeing Mandela from his life sentence in prison. Therefore many people believe the ending of Apartheid was a combination of F.W. De Klerk and Mandela, otherwise Mandela would not have been able to carry out his actions without being released from prison. ...read more.


Therefore, it provides me an opportunity to configure my own opinion and interpretation. Finally, it was written in hindsight, allowing for the historian to acquire and collate a myriad of resources to accurately configure a reliable source. The source is useful, as it insinuates that white people wanted to warrant their actions by blaming black people ? therefore justify their irrational prejudice. A7 is also accurate and reliable, because there is no plausible reason for the government to interfere with the statistics, as the statistics aren?t meant to be propaganda, or otherwise convincing. The statistics would be rendered useless if altered, and therefore are almost definitely factual. The statistics are useful to visualise and quantify the extent of the social gap between black and white peoples, and therefore conclude that black people were unjustly discriminated. CONCLUSION SOURCES B Sources B all provide varying perspectives of whom was most responsible for the deconstruction of the Apartheid, and I feel they all show pragmatic and insightful reasoning. However, to be the most useful and reliable, the sources must not be influenced by external factors. For example, the autobiography would have been influenced by the fact Nelson Mandela was standing for candidacy, and would want to appease his audience. Likewise, Source B5 is an interview, presented on the day of Mandela?s 90th birthday, and therefore it would only be respectful to provide compliments. The most plausible source in my opinion for convincing me of the main instigator to end apartheid would be Sources B2 and B9. B2 demonstrates the extent of Nelson Mandela?s support, and how extensive his trust lies in the desperation of South Africa. The photograph is also indisputable, as it is provided as photographic evidence. B9 is also very reliable because it is found in a history book and therefore would be surely factual, as the author would be well researched and knowledgeable in the subject. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was The Ending of White Minority Rule Achieved Only by Nelson Mandela?

    4 star(s)

    This scared the officials because Mandela is a black man who was not afraid to speak out, therefore banned him leaving Johannesburg. In secret, Mandela worked for the ANC and participated in the Freedom Charter of 1955 which wanted basic rights for non-whites.

  2. Nelson Mandela essay

    Nelson was the lowest class of prisoner which meant he had the poorest living conditions possible at the prison. During his time in prison Mandela became widely known as the most significant black leader in South Africa. In March 1982 Mandela was transferred to Pollsmoor prison.

  1. The end of Apartheid

    MK also managed to help increase the number of people joining the ANC as they were forced to change their policy as well. Eventually the MK Failed to stick to its policy of no loss of life in the process of gaining rights and men were killed, they had to

  2. The End of White Majority Rule in South Africa Coursework

    system, I think the external pressures faced brought about the end more than the internal ones. . De Klerk also had a part to play in the ending of Apartheid. Although it could be argued that he only did it for himself and his party, he still did end it when he wasn't expected too.

  1. Charles the first was completely responsible for the civil war- to what extent is ...

    be the leader, this gives Charles full power, this disturbs the parliament because they are also greedy for power. This is a political, religious and personal cause. Between 1628 and 1629 Parliament only allow Charles money for 1 year, parliament do this so that Charles the first could call parliament yearly.

  2. Was The Leadership Of Nelson Mandela The Main Reason For The Ending ...

    This essay will examine eight sources with contrasting interpretations on the issue to form a full and balanced judgement, on the role and importance of Nelson Mandela in ending apartheid. Source B1 supports the view that Nelson Mandela was the main reason why apartheid ended in South Africa.

  1. St.David's effect on Christianity in Wales

    He became renowned as a teacher and preacher, founding monastic settlements and churches in Wales, Dumnonia, and Brittany. St David's Cathedral stands on the site of the monastery he founded in the Glyn Rhosyn valley of Pembrokeshire. He rose to a bishopric and presided over two synods against Pelagianism: the

  2. Amelia Earhart Autobiography.

    On May 20, 1932, I took off from Harbour Grace, Newfoundland and due to technical difficulties landed in Londonderry, Northern Ireland making me the first woman to fly solo across the Atlantic. Between 1930 and 1935, I set seven women's speed and distance aviation records in a variety of aircraft.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work