Was Oystermouth Castle typical of the castles built in Wales during the middle Ages?

Authors Avatar

                       Coursework: Oystermouth Castle

 Was Oystermouth Castle typical of the castles built in Wales during the middle Ages?                            

                           The middle Ages?

Introduction:

  I am currently studying Oystermouth Castle. I am going to establish whether Oystermouth Castle was typical of castles built in Wales during the middle Ages. William de Londres a Normal lord built Oystermouth Castle in the town of Mumbles. Therefore, Oystermouth was a Norman castle, built as part of a chain of castles that controlled the Gower land and surrounding villages. In the year 1100 a Norman lord, Henry Beaumont took over Gower and is responsible for most of the building of castles in Gower. Swansea Castle being one of his castles built in 1300. It was a very large castle but there is little of it left, except for round towers and a well. Henry Beaumont gave different parts of land to each of his followers; this was called the feudal system. It was then when William de Londres, a Norman lord, built Oystermouth. The de Londres family owned Oystermouth Castle until about 1200, and then it was given back to the Lord of Gower. The Lord of Gower owned Oystermouth Castle after 1200 until about 1330 and the family was called the de Braose family. Alionara de Mowbray was the last of the de Broase family; she married into the de Mowbray family.

  The locations of castles were vital, as castles needed to be on high land, or on the edge of an impregnable cliff to give a commanding view of the surrounding area. It was important that every castle was half a day’s march from each other (approximately 3-6 miles) this was because if there was an invasion, then they could help defend the surrounding castles. Whereas, if the castles were miles away from each other, then they wouldn’t be able to have a defense system, resulting in the castles over time quickly being taken over.

       William the Conqueror built castles to control his land, he realized that people would not accept foreign rule without a struggle. The Welsh were able to resist for more than a hundred years. William the Conqueror also built castles, as they provided a strong point and Norman soldiers were able to control a large number of Anglo Saxon peasants by having a castle as a base. William needed to keep control of his kingdom, which he’d just recently conquered and so ordered castles to be built to protect and defend the land from constant rebellion. At that time Gower was on the border of Norman control, at this period the Welsh controlled parts of Wales, which made it very unsettled with rebellion and attacks. For this reason, the Normans had to built castles to protect themselves, their fertile farmland and the coast.

        The process of building Oystermouth was a very long one. We know this because from the 11th –13th century, Oystermouth was merely a wooden motte and bailey castle. This along with further developments over a long period of time, to make it the stone castle it is today. From the source from “The Chronicles of the Princes” the earliest source from the C13th, we are able to see why the process of building Oystermouth castle was slow. This source is more reliable than the other sources, as this is a primary source from the time of the event, whereas the others are secondary sources wrote at a later period of time.

        1093- “The French devastated Gower, Kidwelly and the Vale of Tawe; and the countries remained a desert.”

 

        1116-“There was a castle in Gower which Gruffudd, son of Rhys, burned entirely.”

        1215- “Lord Rhys, collecting a vast army, advanced on Gower. He made for the castle of Oystermouth and he camped around it that night. The following day he captured the castle, which with the town, he burned.”

      This evidence suggests that it remained a motte and bailey as in two accounts; it says that, the castle had been “burned.” And motte and bailey castles were mainly built out of wood, which was its weakness, as it could easily be destroyed by fire. Also it had been under attack three times, twice burned, which explains why the castles building process was a slow one. There were also several other reasons as to why the castle was built. As the castles were not only great defense systems, but also withheld large communities. Oystermouth’s prime location consists of several factors proving to be advantageous and disadvantageous.

 Oystermouths location

         Firstly, we know it was built on high ground overlooking Swansea bay. We know this from pictures showing it was located on a hill. This enabled defense from attackers coming inland form the sea. Also, this proving to be challenging to attack, as it was built on high ground. It was also built on steep slopes, which provided a good view to the sea and the east. It is located on the western of two ridges overlooking the southern end of Swansea bay and the town of Mumbles. The eastern ridge would have provided a better view of the sea, yet wouldn’t have provided a suitable water supply. This would have been essential if the castle was to withstand siege. The western ridge provided a stronger foundation for their heavy stone building. Then, we are able to see Oystermouth was built on a hill. The second hill had stronger foundations (limestone) and is wider than the first hill, leaving room for expansion. However, the hill in front would have been an obvious blind spot, making it visually easier for attackers. In addition, it could have been possibly been built further from the coast, making their defense system much harder. This would have made it harder to protect the coast, if built a great distance away. Moreover, the fact it was built on a large site for expansions would have been typical for further developments and it had good foundations built out of limestone. Also, it was easy to control the surrounding area, because it was near other castles and it had a good water supply. These factors would out rule the disadvantages.

         We are able to see this from the “drawing of Oystermouth castle” as it may have appeared in 1400” in Source B. This is a secondary source, and even though it’s secondary and may be incorrect, it gives us an idea of Oystermouth Castles appearance, as appeared to just text. This picture shows it built on a hill, with strong foundations on the western ridge.

           Other Castles? 

         Yet, Oystermouth Castle was not the only castle in Wales built at this time. There are infact many other castles with many great similarities as there are differences. We begin with Penard Castle.  Similar to Oystermouth, as it was built on high ground to defend the Gower coastline. However, this time on a cliff, which gave it steeper slopes, making it harder to attack than Oystermouth. Swansea Castle was also built on a hill, yet it differs from Oystermouth as it was designed and built to guard the seaport. Llanstephan Castle was also situated with steep slopes, yet built on a rocky outcrop. Harlech Castle in North Wales was built on high ground on rocky cliffs to protect the coast, once again similar to that of Oystermouth. This is evidence to suggest its location was actually typical of many castles built in Wales during the middle Ages. Yet, there are also castles with locations, which differ greatly from Oystermouth. We begin with Kidwelly Castle, in South Wales. This was built by the side of a river with a moat. This is a very good example to show some differences in location, as it was built on low ground, and by a river with a moat. We know this because Oystermouth was natural and didn’t include a man made artificial moat, unlike Kidwelly. Yet, Beaumaris Castle was built on flat ground with a moat, however built with the same concept as Oystermouth as it was built to protect the coastline. Yet, even more dramatically different to Oystermouth Castle was Conway Castle, as it was built on solid rock between two river estuaries. Therefore, completely different to Oystermouth, as it wasn’t even built on grass, let alone on high ground. Whereas Oystermouth overlooked the coastline, it would have had a good water supply. Throughout all these castles, they are all located by water, as Oystermouth was. This is another example, to show that some of its features were infact typical of castles in Wales during the middle Ages. This would have made essential if to withstand a siege. However most castles were located by rivers, whereas Oystermouth was located by the coast, which doesn’t make it typical of some castles in Wales.

         

Why was it built?

   Finally, we conclude why Oystermouth was built where it was. Other castles Oystermouth was built alongside in the Gower were:

  •  Loughour
  •  Landile
  •  Tal y Bont
  •  Swansea
  •  Penard
  •  Penmaen
  •  Oxwich
  •  Penrice
  •  Mounty Bank
  •  Weobly
  •  Landimore

Clearly, these castles are evidence to show the Gower was greatly protected. This shows that Gower was hard to conquer and was under control. That control being under Norman control. The Normans needed to build so many castles, as Gower was unsettled at that time and castles were needed to protect themselves from Welsh rebellion and attacks. We know that Gower was hard to conquer because there were attacks in 1136, 1189, 1215 and 1215. The Normans had successfully controlled and conquered Gower, as castle building was rare in the Gower by the C13th because Gower had settled down under Norman control, this comes back to the question. Why was Oystermouth Castle built? It was built along with various other castles in Gower under Norman rules to protect and control rebellious attacks from the Welsh.

 

 

Oystermouth Castle’s development (military and domestic)   

Military:   

       Now we look at the military and domestic features of Oystermouth castle. Military features were used to control and protect an area. Domestic features were features for people who lived in the castle. E.g.; family, lords and soldiers. Throughout the timeline of castle development, there are many features, which take place and are further developed. We begin with military features.  During the 11th century (approximately 1066 onwards) motte and bailey were the most convenient and were the start of further developments to come. Oystermouth from the 11th to the 13th century was a motte and bailey castle, and underwent a series of attacks, which lead to its status as a motte and bailey castle to stay for a long time. These were the first castles and were made out of earth and timber. The motte was generally a high mound consisting of earth piled together. The top was flattened and on it, a wooden tower called a keep was built, which a circular wooden palisade surrounded. This process was understandably the first method as it was quick and easy to build (William the Conqueror wanted castles built straight away) a good example of a castle with a moat is Caerphilly Castle, as it had a large wide moat. This feature was not needed at Oystermouth castle, as Oystermouth was not located near a river and only had a steep ditch. Building of stone castles could take many years and alterations and extensions. Wooden motte and bailey castles were temporarily used when conquering an area and then changed to stone when the area was conquered, as there was more time to build. This was one of the features that Oystermouth did not have.

           At around mid 11th – Mid 12th century, shell keeps were popular. This strengthened the motte. Usually, a circular or polygonal stone was placed on top. It had higher slopes in the inner face of the stonewall creating a shell keep. Cardiff Castle is a good example of this. It had a small motte and a stonewall around the top of the keep. Its shell keep would’ve protected the bailey, while the stone would’ve protected vulnerable buildings. During the Mid 12th century onwards, square stone keeps were introduced. These had corners, which were the easiest part to undermine. These also were unfortunately responsible for blind spots. Hedingham Castle in Essex, built in 1140, is a good example of this. It was built earlier than Oystermouth and it had a Norman keep, and was not built on top of a motte. Its shape was a perfect square; it also had watchtowers for added military strength and for a better view. Also its entrance isn’t on the ground floor but actually located on the steps. Similar to that of Oystermouth, as Oystermouth castle also had steps in its keep. Round stone keeps were built later on. These round stone keeps, which replaced the square keeps, were developed in the 13th century. This was because the square keeps corners proved to be disadvantageous. Tretower had a round keep, which was the best type of keep during the 13th century. It was located in Carmarthenshire, though unfortunately couldn’t be kept well preserved. Its shape was perfectly round. Also, similar to Hedingham castle but had no windows on ground floor, with other several features such as a few arrow slits. Though Oystermouth did not have a round or square tower the same time as everyone else, but later on did have a rectangular keep, similar to that of Chepstow.

           The next development, which took place in the later 13th century, and early C14th were curtain walls. A curtain wall replaced the wooden palisades with stone and was given the name “curtain walls.” These walls strengthened the entrance and usually the gatehouse was D shaped. Chepstow castle is a good example of castles with curtain walls. Not only was it equipped with a curtain wall and bailey, which was long, and narrow, it also had many other features. It had good strong foundations, and had a rectangular keep. But, its strong curtain walls had towers, which were round. Oystermouth once again did not fit in with the general development of castle making, as when curtain walls were present, it was still a wooden motte and bailey, having been attacked. Though later on it was built a century later in the late 13th – 14th century. We are able to guess these were present from source B “A drawing of Oystermouth Castle as it may have appeared in 1400” as we are able to see its curtain walls. This source is not entirely reliable, and could help and hinder historians. As it helps us picture what the castle would have looked like, which helps historians make judgments, but is not accurate enough to be reliable. It was drawn for a study on Oystermouth Castle. It is quite reliable as there are still ruins left which the drawing could be based upon and the artist is also an archaeologist survey and informed information on to help to reconstruct it.  This source is based on fact and opinion.

Join now!

         During the late 13th century, barbicans were built as an outer defense to the gatehouse, in the form of a wall or a watchtower and built to give more protection to the gatehouse. Carereg Cennen Castle had a barbican. It also had features such as, a mini gatehouse, a ditch, a moat, and a main gatehouse. Carreg Cennen had evidence that it had a barbican, but one of the arguments faced when dealing with Oystermouth Castle, is that it may have had a barbican, only there is little evidence to suggest this, only that it would’ve have been ...

This is a preview of the whole essay