Was the collapse of the Weimar Republic inevitable?

Authors Avatar

Was the collapse of the Weimar Republic inevitable?

When the Kaiser abdicated to Holland on the 9th November 1918, it was announced from the balcony of the Reichstag that Germany was now a republic. For the first time since its unification in 1871, Germany’s destiny was now in the hands of a democratic body called the Weimar Republic. It was hoped that this would be a new beginning for Germany, and that democracy would be successful.  Many historians have commented that the Weimar Republic was “doomed from the start”. However, if this were the case, it seems strange that such a supposedly shaky establishment managed to last for 14 years, and overcame many tests during this period, particularly between 1919 and 1923. Therefore, it is not completely clear that the collapse of the Weimar Republic was inevitable

        Problems started for the Weimar Republic as soon as it got into power. Two days after the republic was declared in Germany, Weimar politicians signed an armistice with the allies to end the war. However, to many Germans, these politicians became known as the “November Criminals” as part of the “stab in the back” theory, used extensively by the extreme right.

  Clauses in the Treaty of Versailles such as the loss of land to Poland, and the reduction in the size of Germany’s armed forces left the German public with the sense betrayal by the politicians, and a bitter resentment towards the Republic itself. Therefore the legacy that had been left behind by the Tsar had caused some Germans to dislike the Weimar Republic from the start.   This obviously wasn’t helpful to the Weimar Republic, as it did not have the support of a proportion of the population that it was supposed to represent. The constitution drawn up by the Weimar politicians in 1919 was also very weak. It contained within it the seeds of its own destruction. Article 48 of the new constitution allowed the chancellor to rule by presidential decree intended only to be used in the case of an emergency, to defend the regime against political enemies. However, it was easily abused initially be Hindenburg, but it was later used by Hitler to destroy the Weimar Republic. The weakness in the way that the constitution was drawn up also meant that there were frequent elections. A single party had to get 51% of the seats in the Reichstag in order to be able to pass laws successfully. If a party did not get the majority, they would have to join up with another party in order to achieve one. Such coalitions tended not to last very long, as the two parties could not co-operate, so fresh elections had to be held. This clearly was not good for the stability of the new democratic body, and would make the German people unsure of the new system of democracy, and give them lack of confidence in the system. The constitution also made it easy for anti-democratic parties such as the KPD and the NSDAP to gain seats in the Reichstag. According to Kolb

Join now!

In the form it took in 1919, parliamentary democracy was truly accepted and zealously defended by only a minority of the population.”

        The French occupation of the Ruhr in January 1923 was a crucial economic point for the Weimar Republic. The workers in the Ruhr were instructed no to co-operate with the occupiers and in effect, strike. A massive increase in public spending was met by a reduction in taxation due to the Ruhr being paralysed. This led to the collapse of Germany’s currency, and also hyperinflation in Germany. Hyper inflation hit the middle class the hardest. They ...

This is a preview of the whole essay