Was the League of Nations doomed to failure from the start?

Authors Avatar

Was the League of Nations doomed to failure from the start?

The league, initially set up to ensure and protect world peace, did not have an easy task. The league had many faults from the beginning and even if we bear in mind the successes, we can still see that the failures out weighed the successes tremendously.

The league succeeded in setting up commissions and committees.

  • International Labour Organization was developed and worked to improve working conditions all over the world. They persuaded governments to set maximum working day and week, specify adequate minimum wages and introduce old age pensions, unemployment and sickness benefits.
  • Refugee Organization - solved the problem of the thousands of prisoners of war marooned in Russia at the end of the war; about half a million were returned home. After 1933 valuable help was given to thousands fleeing from Nazi persecution in Germany.
  • Health Organization - did good work in investigating the causes of epidemics and was particularly successful in combating typhus in Russia which endangered the rest of Europe.
  • Mandates - supervised the government of the territories taken from Germany and Turkey according to the terms of the Treaty of Versailles.
Join now!

Things also looked helpful because the league was a new approach trying to make something different work. The aims were also excellent and 42 countries joined voluntarily and 16 joined later on. All countries were equal and the league did have sanctions.

However there were many problems in the league from the start.

The French and British self interest ruled the league. They wouldn't abandon these to support the league. They both were permanent members who had the right to veto and so that meant if something did not suit their interests it would not happen.
There were absent ...

This is a preview of the whole essay