• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1956 and 1968?

Extracts from this document...


Sam Coleman MAU 12/7/2001 What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1956 and 1968? The U.S.A expected an easy victory in Vietnam. The US president Johnson had access to vast financial resources and the latest in technology, and of course they were fighting a third world country that had no such resources or money. The VC/NVA expected to win because they had already defeated the French and Japanese using guerrilla tactics and therefore expected to defeat the U.S.A. The war was being fought in Vietnam; therefore the VC/NVA had a better knowledge and experience of fighting in the forest area and environment, gained from conflicts against the French, as well as the support from their fellow Vietnamese. Knowledge of the forest was particularly helpful as the US troops were inexperienced at fighting in this environment. As the war developed, both sides had to adapt their tactics due to the way that the opposition was fighting. The VC/NVA used a strategy of guerrilla tactics. This involved winning the support and co-operation the peasants. They did this by promising them land and freedom from imperialism. The guerrilla's would hide in a community of a small village or town. The guerrillas did not wear a uniform and therefore it was very difficult for US soldiers to distinguish a VC soldier from a peasant. This would provide a basis for an ambush that would take place at night. ...read more.


The Americans avoided bombing major cities of Hanoi and Haiphong as they did not want to do any more damage to their relationship with the USSR. They hoped the bombings would show the North Vietnamese people what power the US had at its disposal. But mass bombing didn't destroy the morale of the North Vietnamese. The US also bombed the Ho Chi Minh Trail. In fact the Americans had dropped a total of 7 million tonnes of bombs - twice that dropped in the Second World War. The Americans used 'hearts and minds' to win over the affection of the Vietnamese people. They did this by providing them with schools and hospitals. This worked as some Vietnamese co-operated closely with the Americans. Others made money from the presence in their country. Most Vietnamese, outside the cities, saw the Americans as their enemy. They saw them kill and destroy, therefore not winning their 'hearts and minds.' The Vietcong response to the US tactics was to dig a network of tunnels. Over 150 miles of tunnels were built under South Vietnam. This provided the Vietcong with shelter from Americans. Here they moved and lived undetected. The Americans believed that the Vietcong were forced to build these tunnels due to the devastation that the Americans had caused. This could have been seen as a slight morale booster for the Americans. But this was a sign of the Vietcong's determination rather than a sign of weakness. ...read more.


The final reason for US failure was the rotation of troops. After one year of fighting American troops were sent home and troops were bought into replace them. This was of a disadvantage to the Americans as troops had little time to adapt to fighting in dense forestry and by the time they were leaving had only just started to have sufficient knowledge of the area. Inexperienced troops also fell victim to booby traps as knowledge of them had yet to be gathered and tell tail signs of them was unknown. With news of the massacre of a war that these new troops were to enter, many of them entered with a low morale and low will to fight. Furthermore, the Vietcong proved to be very resistant and determined enemies. The Vietcong were able to win the support of the peasants. This made the Vietcong able to have the basis to launch an ambush and to hide amongst a community, which made them hard to find. This also contributed to American frustration. The Vietcong also had a higher morale than the US troops. They were confident as they were fighting on home soil and had experience in fighting in the forestry environment against previous opponents like the French. The Vietcong were also extremely determined. This can be proven by the creation of tunnels that were used as shelter from the US airforces. These tunnels were very complex and ran for about 250 kilometres, this proved that the Vietcong were hardworking and extremely determined to resist the American bombardment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Why did the Communists win the Vietnam War?

    Even so, the US military strategists were unable to differentiate between 'between guerilla warfare, which depended on control of the population, and conventional war, which depended on control of territory'. The US forces were unused to jungle and guerilla warfare and insisted on using conventional military methods that were ill-suited to the geography of Vietnam.

  2. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    I shall look at and a***s some sources which support this particular viewpoint. Source O states that 'the media elite possess little power in affecting change in political policy or the system for policy making.' This source infers that the media had did influence the course of the war because

  1. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    Lloyd George wrote source E. He and Haig had both been criticised for how the war was run and he would have replaced Haig with someone else if he had been able to when he became Prime Minister. He had a lot of reasons to make Haig look bad this could make himself look blame free.

  2. Why was there opposition to the Vietnam war?

    To write a reliable account of the behaviour of the soldiers in Vietnam, you would need to have a variety of evidence. You would have to talk to as many US service men, Vietcong fighters and Vietnamese peasants as possible, to get every side of the story.

  1. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    This was so that if one of the guerrilla's was captured and then tortured, what he told the Americans could not harm the Vietcong on a large scale. Another way the Vietcong benefited is that they blended in with the villagers and so the Americans were not sure if someone was a civilian or a soldier from the Vietcong.

  2. How much impact did the Tet offensive have on conflict in Vietnam?

    many us troops were caught out as continuous attacks occurred on many cities drawing the americans attention to them, forcing the americans to switch focus. the vc had been trained for these attacks but US forces had regained most of the south, apart from some of the rural areas.

  1. How Effective Were The Tactics Of Search And Destroy And Defoliation During The Vietnam ...

    they would relocate to areas more heavily controlled by the US, to add the operation then went on to source out the Ho Chi Minh trail. Operation Ranch Hand spanned out over a gloomy nine years, the air force had long running campaigns to defoliate jungles and Vietnamese terrain.

  2. I think that the four most significant themes in the Vietnam War were protest ...

    They (The North Vietnamese) took me for dead, thank God. One of them lay down on top of me and started to set up his machine gun. The Cong opened up on our mortar platoon. The platoon returned the fire, killing about half of the Cong, and miraculously not hitting

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work