Why did Tzar Nicholas II abdicate in 1917 and not in 1905?

Authors Avatar

Why did Tzar Nicholas II abdicate in 1917 and not in 1905

October 29, 2008

Why did Tzar Nicholas II abdicate in 1917 and not in 1905?

The Tzar abdicated following the revolution of 1917 but he did not abdicate after the 1905 revolution. There were a number of key factors which made this happen, in this essay I will be looking into the similarities and the differences. During both revolutions the people went on strike over poor working conditions and poor pay, but there were differences and these were the factors that determined the survival and the fall of the Tzar. Russia had many difficulties for a ruler. The size of Russia is incredible, 17,075,400 square kilometers of land, however there was only one railway across the country so much of the country was unreachable and passing a message on was very difficult. In addition Tsar Nicholas was a weak and unpopular ruler, having been passed down his status as absolute monarch and not having to work for it. His popularity was worsened by the fact that his family lived in great wealth and yet there was terrible poverty across most of the population.

February 1904, a war broke out between Russia and Japan which became known as the Russo-Japanese war. This war was over a town called Manchuria situated in Northern China. Manchuria was home to the only dock on the eastern coast which did not freeze during the winter months. This made it tactically important to Russia’s navy. Russia badly lost this war even though they were seen as the more powerful country and the Tzar was advised to pull out of Manchuria. At first he did not listen to this advice because he did not want to be seen as a weak ruler and admitting defeat would prove this but as the situation got worse on the other side of the continent he realized that he needed the army to help him control the winter Palace  protests, and therefore he was forced to admit defeat in China. Ultimately he was able to control the revolution in 1905 and his position wasn’t threatened.

Join now!

 But in 19 17 Russia was losing the First World War. This was much worse than any war they had previously been in, Russia’s land and was being threatened and the Russian population was forced to move. As most of Russia’s population was in the west of the country this war affected most of the population so people knew what was happening unlike the previous Russo-Japanese war. Secondly the Tzar’s reputation as ruler was worsened because of the strength of their opposition. Austria Hungary and Germany had many fixed machine gun posts and a very strong leader in Field Marshal ...

This is a preview of the whole essay