Why is the Good Friday Agreement proving so difficult to implement?

Authors Avatar

Why is the Good Friday Agreement proving so difficult to implement?

The Good Friday Agreement was voted on by a relatively large turnout of 68.8% in 1998 and was rejected by a significant 29% of people in Northern Ireland.  For the past six years it has proved to be difficult to implement and there are a number of reasons for this.  The emphasis on issues raised in the agreement has changed over the years and some are proving to be more difficult to implement than others.

        A major area within the Good Friday Agreement is the setting up of an Assembly.  Hard line Unionists such as the DUP refuse to accept the Assembly.  They refuse to sit at a table with Sinn Féin in cross party talks while they argue that Sinn Féin still have links with the IRA.  The DUP’s mindset has been created by fifty two years of unionist rule.  They do not wish to accept principles contained within the agreement which they feel they have already rejected in the 1974 power sharing executive.  The DUP are now offering a full re-negotiation of the agreement and their slogan for the last elections was, ‘It’s time for a new deal.’

        There are deep divisions within the official unionist party. There is continual disagreement over how many concessions can be made to nationalists.  David Trimble the party leader has remained committed to the agreement despite bitter criticism from fellow unionists and himself also feeling uneasy over some elements of it.  He has faced leadership challenges and recent defections to the DUP by Geoffrey Donaldson, Arlene Foster and Norah Beare have reduced the number of seats held by the UUP.  David Trimble must have the support of his own party and of grass roots unionists before he can make a major move.  Unionism could be said to be in crisis.

Join now!

        Another contentious issue has been the formation of a North/South council.  Some unionists view this as a step towards a United Ireland.  They reject the south having any say in how the north is run.  They view it as a step back towards other agreements that had a southern element to them, like the Sunningdale and Anglo Irish Agreements as well as the Downing Street Declaration of 1993.  Their attitude is that if it didn’t work then, why should it work now?

        As part of the agreement the Irish Republic had to remove articles 2 and 3 from its ...

This is a preview of the whole essay