Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

Authors Avatar

Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

Choose any one reason from the list and explain how it contributed to Lenin’s rise to power?

There are many factors to why Lenin came to power in 1917. Such as the mistakes that Kerensky’s Provisional Government had made after the Tsar’s abdication and the social and economic effects to Russia after World War 1. But I feel that one of the most significant is Tsar Nicholas II’s personality and Style of Government. IN this question I will be talking about Tsar Nicholas II and his government.

Tsar Nicholas II was born in 1868. He married to ‘Alexandra of Hesse’ (granddaughter of Queen of Victoria), of whom was German. Nicholas came to power after his father’s death in 1896 but at first he did not want the role of leader of Russia and never did. As seen when he wrote to his son-in-law “ What am I going to do? What is going to happen to me? I am not prepared to be Tsar. I never want to become one…’ (this is) the worst thing that could happened to me, the thing I have been dreading all my life.”   But like his father and grandfather he could image any other form of government for Russia than Autocracy. Which meant that an individual with unrestricted authority rules the government. Nicholas had already failed to realize that the passing of time would mean some change would be necessary in the way that Russia was governed. Excellent as such qualities are in an ordinary person, they were not enough for the ruler of an autocracy. Nicholas found day-to-day work of governing Russia extremely boring and he could not stand reading reports or attending long meetings with his ministers. Many of his ministers would complain that Nicholas would seem to agree with suggestions at the time but if anyone got to him after he would change his mind. Count Witte was an important government minister that that Nicholas was “A ruler who cannot be trusted, who approves today what he will reject tomorrow, is incapable of steering the ship of state into quiet harbour.” Because of this his ministers lost confidence in Nicholas, which lead them in the future to go on other sides e.g. Communist Party or Bolsheviks Party. Nicholas appointed many of his ministers to carry out an old corrupt of Autocracy ways; for example taking bribes and persecuting ill-treated Jews. This led to many people blaming Nicholas personally for their hardship and to form groups opposing him. Count Witte later went on to say that “The emperor was surrounded by Jew-haters such as Trevpov, Plehve…As for his personal attitude toward the Jews I recall that whenever I drew his attention to the fact that the antiJewish riots could not be tolerated, he either was silent or remarked ‘But it is they themselves, the zhidy* that are to blame” This quote shows that Nicholas was antiJewish because his rather being influenced by Jew-haters or he cannot be bothered to sort it out himself. This led many Jewish people on Lenin’s side because Lenin promised them better life, than what Nicholas could proved being antiJewish.  

Bloody Sunday was when the working people of St. Petersburg went to the Tsar asking for him to reduce their working days to eight hours, the fixing of wage rates in consultation with them. A Socialist priest how was head of the workers union asked the Tsar to come out and speak to the nation at his winter place “Do not believe the ministers, they are cheating thee in regard to real state of affairs. The people believe thee. They have made up their minds to meet at the Winter Palace tomorrow at 2pm.” This shows that the protestors wanted a peaceful protest but the next day at Tsar Nicholas Winter Palace. But the next day at two instead of the Tsar coming out he sent his Cossacks out and as they drew out their swords and killed many of the working class. The official report says that “In some places bloody clashes took place between workers and troops because of the stubborn refusal of the crowd to obey the command to go home, and even sometimes even because off attacks upon the troops…” This propaganda is to show that Tsar Nicholas is still head of Russia. But infact the Tsar was losing support of his working class, which where joining other Parties such Socialist Revolutionaries of whom were trying to upraise violence between the peasants and the Tsar.

Join now!

The 1905 revolution was infact the first of two revolutions were other parties tried to take Russia from under Tsar Nicholas rule. But it failed because Tsar Nicholas still had the support of his army, which helped protect him. But now Tsar Nicholas released that for him to survive as Russia’s leader he would have to make changes to the way he ran Russia. The result was The October Manifesto. This meant that Nicholas would become a figurehead, leaving the important decisions to elected politicians (rather like the monarch in Britain) called Duma. The peasants, Landowners and townspeople that ...

This is a preview of the whole essay