World War 1 - Breaking of the Stalemate

Authors Avatar

The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western Front was broken:

  • New technology like the tank.
  • The American entry into the war.
  • The blockading of German ports.
  • The German offensive of March 1918.

Explain how far you agree with this Statement

The Stalemate of WW1 marked the need for new ways to wage war. It involved the Allies and the Germans, who were stuck in a deadlock along a 400 mile stretch of fortified trenches. In chess, when a stalemate is reached, it signals the end of the game and the result of a draw. In a war, this is not the case, and a stalemate can later be broken. I will be looking at how the stalemate on the Western front was ended. The stalemate was broken in March 1918, when the Germans launched an all out offensive for the first time in just under 4 years. They began again a war of movement, which then, in turn, ended with an armistice in November that year. As asked in the question, I will look at the 4 reasons given as the causes of the stalemate ending. I will make a judgement on whether I think they were all equal causes that ended the stalemate. I will also think about other causes of the breaking of the stalemate.

First, I will look at the new technology being created at the time; Gas, Tanks, Machine Guns to name but a few. These had a severe impact on the time of war it became, and accounted for the vast number of deaths and casualties during the war, which numbers were previously unprecedented. The technology was created desperately, searching for an end to the war that was having huge negative impacts on every country involved. To begin with, I will look at machine guns.

Machine Guns were designed to fire multiple bullets quickly, without the need for reloading. At the start of the war, machine guns took 4-6 men to operate, and fired 400-600 rounds a minute. By the end of the war, the required men had been halved, and the firepower doubled. In 1914, Germany had approximately 14,000 machine guns, which increased to over 100,000 over the next few years. The British and French had access to many fewer, mainly due to the British disapproval of them. This gave Germany a large advantage near the beginning of the war. However, while the stalemate was in place, Britain and France produced many more. The guns of both sides were similar in power and efficiency, causing neither side to have an advantage over the other with machine guns.

Join now!

A weapon new to war was gas. The French first employed it in WW1 by filling some grenades with tear gas in 1914. Later that year, the Germans fired shells, containing a chemical irritant, but they used such little amounts it was barely noticed. The Germans were the first to use gas on a large scale, firing 18,000 artillery shells with tear gas at the Russians in 1915. However, the chemical froze, before becoming a gas, and so failed to work. Over the war, gasses became much more destructive, with some gasses that killed the victims. Deployment of gasses became ...

This is a preview of the whole essay