• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11
12. 12
12
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 2148

# An Investigation into the Relationship Between Weight and IQ at Mayfield High School.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

## Hypothesis

I will investigate the following statements:

• Heavier people have a lower IQ than lighter people.
• Boys are heavier than girls.
• Therefore, Girls are more intelligent than Boys.

I will need to collect the following information:

• Year Group:
• So I can make sure I collect a fair sample using every year in the school.
• Gender:
• So I can investigate the statement boys are heavier than girls and girls are more intelligent than boys.
• IQ:
• So I can investigate the statements girls are more intelligent than boys and heavier people have lower IQs.
• Weight:
• So I can investigate the statements boys are heavier than girls and heavier people have lower IQs.

I know that this data is reliable because it came from the recognized EDEXCEL GCSE exam bored website, but there may still be some manual errors in the data from when it was being typed up.

Middle

Male

106

70

9

Fenton

Aaron

Male

104

55

9

Haugh

Jason

Male

112

48

9

Anthony

Male

105

46

9

Samas

Sam

Male

102

43

9

Wood

Male

89

6

9

Brown

Caroline

Female

108

48

9

Burns

Emma

Female

109

38

9

Green

Nichola

Female

108

38

9

Johnson

Emma

Female

103

50

9

Knight

Victoria

Female

120

40

9

McNaughton

Bonnie

Female

116

48

9

O'Donald

Louise

Female

102

36

9

Smith

Sasha

Female

103

48

9

Taylor

Elizabeth

Female

117

41

9

Peacock

Ruth

Female

107

57

10

Banks

Semour

Male

116

9

10

Black

Joe

Male

90

50

10

Cook

Shaun

Male

116

40

10

Jones

Nathan

Male

92

76

10

Leach

Peter

Male

106

59

10

Scrannage

Ben

Male

106

64

10

Taylor

Lewis

Male

113

80

10

Ali

Aisha

Female

103

45

10

Chayse

Erica

Female

113

52

10

Fox

Serena

Female

108

40

10

Kevill

Jaide

Female

101

48

10

Sampras

Paula

Female

103

48

10

Yo

Rhonda

Female

94

47

11

Chinny

Anthony

Male

112

56

11

Friend

Aaron Carl

Male

102

60

11

Hope

Steven

Male

98

93

11

McGuire

Frederick

Male

89

70

11

Parker

Peter

Male

100

60

11

Vincent

Nigel

Male

86

62

11

Barlow

Louise

Female

102

44

11

Butt

Paveen

Female

103

54

11

Jonson

Kirten

Female

100

39

11

Neeley

Debroah

Female

103

47

11

Tazmer

Leigh

Female

106

56

11

Zarrent

Donna

Female

103

48

### Collect Process and Represent

The table on the previous page is not a very useful way of representing data. Because both my sets of data are continuous I am going to use stem and leaf digrams to work out the frequency for my sets of data.

After I have worked out the frequency of my data I can use it plot histograms of the weight and IQ. I will then plot a frequency polygon to compare the sets of data ffor genders. This will help me prove my statement that boys are heavier than girls and that girls are more intelligent than boys.

Stem and Leaf Tables

IQ – Mixed

 Stem Leaf Frequency 70 1 2 6 3 80 1 6 6 9 9 5 90 0 1 2 2 4 8 9 9 9 9 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 48 110 0 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 5 6 6 6 6 6 14 120 0 1 80

IQ - Boys

 Stem Leaf Frequency 70 1 2 2 80 1 6 6 9 9 5 90 0 1 2 8 9 5 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 5 5 6 6 6 8 9 20 110 2 2 3 3 3 5 6 6 8 40

Conclusion

I am now going to continue my investigation by ploting a cumulative frequency graph, a much more powerful tool for comparing different data sets because I feel my result are not conclusive enough in proving my statement that boys are heavier than girls, but I feel that the statement that girls are more intelligent than boys has been proved pretty conclusively.

 Weights (KG) Cumulative Frequency Boys Girls Mixed <30 3 0 3 <40 9 5 13 <50 19 28 47 <60 27 39 66 <70 32 39 71 <80 36 39 75 <90 37 39 76 <100 39 39 78 <110 39 39 78 <120 40 39 79 <130 40 39 79 <140 40 39 79 <150 40 40 80

The Cumulative frequency graph proves that the weight of 140kg is an anomaly; it is probably caused by manual error when the spreadsheet was being typed up. Without that anomaly I have proved that boys weigh more than girls.

I am now going to compare the weight to the IQ. I think the most sensible way to do this is using a scatter diagram.

Weight and IQ Comparison for boys

 Weight 48 37 38 53 29 38 40 51.5 26 56 IQ 99 108 72 100 115 102 109 81 91 100
 Weight 37 29 72 46 48 61 50 110 45 38 IQ 71 100 113 102 86 102 105 113 100 102
 Weight 44 70 55 48 46 43 96 90 50 40 IQ 100 106 104 112 105 102 89 108 109 108
 Weight 76 59 64 80 56 60 93 70 60 62 IQ 92 106 106 113 112 102 98 89 100 86

The scatter diagram show very little correlation between weight and IQ.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

1. ## Mayfield. HYPOTHESIS 1: Boys at Mayfield School are Taller and Weigh more on ...

In addition to this will be the major form of representation in my and I believe this shows the trend clearly and efficiently.

2. ## Mayfield igh Investigation

immediate thing I notice about the year 11 boys' data is that the outcomes from are much higher than any other set of data within this. The modal class is 175.5?h>195 whereas with year 7 boys and girls and year 11 girls were between 155.5? h>170.5 between all the data.

1. ## Statistics Mayfield High

A value -1 will show that the graph has a strong negative correlation and a value of 0 shows it has no correlation. As it is easy to create on the computer. I am doing each year separately, so I will therefore not be sampling data for this hypothesis.

2. ## Handling Data - Mayfield High School

43 44 98 4 4 4 4 44 79 108 5 4 4 4 45 45 118 5 5 5 5 46 20 110 4 4 5 4 Year 11 girls 47 37 100 4 4 4 4 48 2 108 5 5 5 5 49 39 97 3 3

1. ## maths coursework-Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations

My evidence also suggests that the boys' weight is more spread out than the girls' weight but my comments would me more accurate if the sample was extended. Height bar charts Now I will do the same for height. This is a bar chart for boys' height.

2. ## Mayfield High School

You continue down each row until you find five valid numbers. Method 3: Scientific calculators have a random number button. This can be used in a similar way to the random number table, to select the five members. In convenience sampling the interviewer or questionnaire asks a specific sample size to ask questions.

1. ## Mayfield high school

KS2 Year Gender IQ English Maths Science Average Average of year group 7 Male 94 4 3 3 3.3333333 7 Male 94 3 3 4 3.3333333 7 Male 98 4 3 4 3.6666667 7 Male 97 4 3 4 3.6666667 7 Male 105 2 3 2 2.3333333 7 Male 108

2. ## Mayfield High School investigations

Year 11 boys are heavier than Year 7 boys Mid-point Year 7 boys c.f. Year 11 boys c.f. 36<x?40 38 1 1 0 0 41<x?45 43 1 2 0 0 46<x?50 48 0 2 0 0 51<x?55 53 0 2 1 1 56<x?60 58 0 2 2 3 Here

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to
improve your own work