Year seven Males
13 282 142, 156, 173, 182, 191, 207, 211, 219, 238, 245, 261, 274, 279
Year eight Females
11 284-400 297, 301, 308, 324, 348, 351, 355, 373, 378, 389, 391
Year eight males
12 409-531 417, 421, 438, 441, 467, 482, 487, 493, 508, 511, 533, 551
Year nine Females
12 534-700 567, 571, 592, 604, 623, 627, 648, 659, 671, 627, 687, 694
Year nine Males
10 700-820 705, 712, 714, 731, 752, 759, 776, 788, 801, 807
Year ten Females
8 815-925 821, 829, 837, 841, 866, 895, 904, 901
Year ten Males
9 920-1025 923, 937, 954, 968, 971, 992, 997, 1008, 1011
Year 11 Females
7 1015-1100 1017, 1033, 1051, 1062, 1074, 1092, 1098
Year 11 Males
7 1100-1184 1102, 1123, 1128, 1147, 1152, 1174, 1181
Table C
Year 7, 8, 9
Table D
Year 10, 11
This graph has a positive correlation. This graph supports my original hypothesis.
This graph has a positive correlation. This graph supports my original hypothesis
Female year 7-9
Male year 7-9
Female year 10-11
Male year 10-11
Conclusion
- As I predicted the average height and weight for males was greater than for females. However, this turned out to be much lower than I expected.
F M
Height (1.58-1.62)
Weight (47.25-47.51)
If you compare the results for year 7, 8, 9 and year 10, 11 we found that there was very little difference in year 7, 8, 9. This is probably due to the fact that year 7 girls develop earlier than year 7 boys and then year 7 boys catch up by year 9.
- From my graphs I can see that when looking at the whole schools height and weight I can see there is a positive correlation. I then broke the school up into upper school and lower school. In these graphs you can notice that there is also a positive correlation.
