• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Word count: 2787

Maths - statistical driving test

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Maths Coursework

Driving Test

For this piece of coursework I have been given details from a local driving school.  The details fall under four headings, these are gender, number of 1hour lessons, number of minor mistakes and instructor.  My aim is to use this data to further investigate by creating hypothesis, using the data to prove or disprove my theories.  Before deciding on what to investigate I need to look at the breakdown of the collected data, I will then use this information to decide on my investigation topics.

Total data = 240 students.

Instructor                 A                B                C                D        Total

Male                        29                49                18                20        116

Female                31                51                22                20        124

No of students        60                100                40                40        240

Overall in this table there is no gender basis as the male/female split is roughly 50/50.  The instructor with the most students is B with 100 students, and the instructor with the least students is C/D with forty students each.  Also each instructor has roughly 50/50 male and female split in students.

From the breakdown of the data in the table I am able to identify three investigations.  T help me in these investigations I will use a spreadsheet to do all calculations and graphs.


My first graphs show the breakdown of data


image02.png

image03.png

Graph 1

The pie chart clearly shows the breakdown of instructors and students.  B has the most students, followed by A, with C and D having the same amount of students.

Graph 2

...read more.

Middle

19

B

F

23

3

B

F

13

19

B

F

26

26

B

M

31

1

B

M

40

15

B

M

19

16

B

M

10

30

B

F

24

28

B

F

30

15

B

F

18

19

B

F

17

5

B

F

30

24

B

M

15

24

B

M

34

6

B

M

20

15

B

M

20

15

B

F

39

23

B

F

23

10

B

M

16

21

B

F

28

15

C

F

39

1

C

F

23

21

C

M

16

24

C

F

20

25

C

M

10

27

C

M

14

32

C

F

19

26

C

M

40

2

C

M

14

28

C

M

32

13

D

M

22

9

D

F

40

19

D

F

30

25

D

F

11

36

D

M

40

4

D

M

29

25

D

M

38

10

D

F

31

24

D

F

24

28

D


Graph 3 - everyone


Graph 4

image04.png

Conclusion for graph 3

Graph 3 shows a scatter graph of lessons against mistakes for the whole population.  If taking more lessons means that you make less mistakes this should be shown on the graph as negative correlation.  On my graph there is no correlation, providing me with no information.

Conclusion for graph 4

Graph 4 is the scatter graph for the stratified sample group of students         and

once again there was no form of correlation, suggesting that my hypothesis may be incorrect because the sample that I picked may not

have been representative of the population, or that they hypothesis itself needs to be refined.  


Hypothesis two

The more lessons a student takes the less mistakes they will make depending on their instructor.  This means that some instructors are better than others.

Techniques to be used

To investigate this hypothesis I will be using two techniques:-

  1. Stratified sampling
  2. Scatter graphs and correlation
  3. Comparison of each individual instructors whole population and stratified sample population.  

Expected outcomes

Hypothesis two is a refinement of hypothesis one; in this next stage of the investigation I have suggested that some instructors are better than others. To investigate this hypothesis I decided to use scatter graphs.

...read more.

Conclusion


Graph 18 & 19 Conclusion

In graph 18 I have plotted the cumulative frequency for both the male and female students.  From my graph I can see that more males make between 5 and 23 mistakes, but more females make between 23 and 40 mistakes.  This again supports my hypothesis that females make more mistakes than males, proving my hypothesis to be correct.  I used my cumulative frequency graph to produce box plots which are displayed on graph 19.  After examining graph 19 I have distinguished that the female students have a bigger range than the males, however the male’s boxplots shows that the males have a bigger inter-quartile range than the females.  Lastly it can be clearly seen on the box plots that the females have a higher median than the males.  These findings once again suggest that the females make more mistakes in comparison to the male students, supporting my hypothesis, indicating that it was correct.  

After distinguishing that my hypothesis was correct I feel that a further investigation could explore the possibility of variables that would have affected the actual validity of my findings.  As my investigation only considered a comparison of mistakes I feel that if I was given the opportunity to repeat this piece of coursework I would take into account the factors which may have contributed towards the students mistakes, these would include the weather, the time of lesson, the day of the lesson, the type of manoeuvre, and many other factors which may have affected the accuracy of my overall outcome.

                

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Gary's (and other) Car Sales section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Gary's (and other) Car Sales essays

  1. Used Cards - find which factors will influence the price of a second hand ...

    Spearman's rank formula will now allow me to produce successful scatter graphs, that will turn out to become a more reliable and accurate outcome. Ford - Spearman's Rank Car Age Mileage Year Ranking Mileage Ranking d d squared 35 8 10000 16.5 10.5 6 36 187 7 10000 13 10.5

  2. T-Total Maths

    5 6 7 25 16 6 7 8 26 17 7 8 9 5 X 20 = 100 - 37 = 63 FORMUAL 5N - 63 GRID-10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

  1. Used second hand cars

    Age depreciation per year= Price when new- Second hand price Age of the car Car No: Make Price when new Second hand price Difference Age Depreciation per year Percentage depreciation 2 Mercedes 14425 10999 3426 1 3426 23.75043328 4 Vauxhall 14325 6595 7730 4 1932.5 53.96160558 6 Renault 13610 4999

  2. Factors affecting price of Used Car

    4 17.4% Club 4531 1 23.2% Metro 5750 7 12.4% 114 Sli 6100 6 11.8% Car Model Price Difference Age Depreciation rate per year Bravo 6856 5 13.24702927 Cinquecento 4014 6 11.13330005 Tipo 6772 7 11.69521967 Bravo 5815 2 26.89639223 Uno 5369 8 9.777462121 Bravo 4159 1 37.96786562 Tempra 9128

  1. Maths coursework - car prices

    by rearranging the equation to make X the subject in the equation The following calculations have been done to work out the age of differently priced second hand cars: 1. Y = 6000 6000 = 776.66x +10327 6000-10327 =-0.0054x X = 6000-10327 776.66 X=5.571292457 X=6(to the nearest age in years)

  2. Data Handling Coursework

    Vauxhall 8900 4995 2 43.88 Volkswagen 9960 7550 1 24.2 Ford 8748 1995 7 77.19 Volkswagen 14950 13500 1 9.7 Ford 1600 7999 1 50 Honda 12895 7995 1 38 Mercedes 14425 10999 1 23.75 Mercedes 17915 11750 2 34.41 Peugeot 17490 7500 1 57.12 Peugeot 9125 7500 1 17.81

  1. CAR SALES MATHS COURSEWORK

    6 52000 2 28 Vauxhall 16300 5300 6 70000 2 29 Fiat 8700 6500 3 24000 1.2 30 Rover 7300 4600 2 17000 1.1 31 Rover 7300 5400 1 11000 1.1 32 Rover 7300 4800 1 26000 1.1 33 Fiat 13000 2700 5 51000 2 34 Peugeot 13800 11000 1

  2. Mathematics course work

    To find the interquartile range I must find the lower and upper quartile. In this case they are: Lower quartile 2 4 7 10 11 Upper quartile 2 4 7 10 11 The lower quartile is 4 and the upper quartile is 10.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work