• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11
12. 12
12
13. 13
13
14. 14
14
15. 15
15
16. 16
16
17. 17
17
18. 18
18
19. 19
19
20. 20
20
21. 21
21
22. 22
22
23. 23
23
24. 24
24
25. 25
25
26. 26
26
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 8213

# Maths Statistics Coursework - relationship between the weight and height

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Matthew Eden

Planning

Introduction:

In this investigation, I am aiming to find out information on the relationship between the weight and height and the relationship between the age and height.

Hypotheses:

• As the height increases, the weight increases
• As the age increases, the height increases
• Boys have a higher average height than girls

Justification:

I think that as someone’s height increases, their weight increases. I predict this because of basic knowledge of the human body. As someone’s body grows, it the muscles, bones and fat on the body increases and gets larger. And as these increase, they make the body weigh more. I will present this data in scatter graphs for boys, girls and both. I will use Microsoft Excel to create this graph because I think that it will prevent human error and it will enable me to change the scales or any other amendments at any time with ease. This will help me compare and contrast the different genders’ heights and weights. To give me knowledge of the correct correlation, I will use product-moment correlation coefficient which is a calculation that shows the correlation value of the data. For all the scatter graphs, I will construct them by using Microsoft Excel which will allow me to group the data to present them into scatter graphs.

I predict that as the student gets older, their height also increases for all boys and girls. This is probably because as you get older, you grow which also increases your height. I will simply plot this data in a scatter graph showing the ages and heights, hopefully providing me some correlation which I can interpret.

Also, I think that all boys will be taller than all the girls in all the year groups in the school.

Middle

0.5202

1.60

49

-0.01

-0.8

0.000081

0.64

0.0072

1.55

45

-0.06

-4.8

0.003481

23.04

0.2832

1.53

52

-0.08

2.2

0.006241

4.84

-0.1738

1.49

52

-0.12

2.2

0.014161

4.84

-0.2618

1.66

45

0.05

-4.8

0.002601

23.04

-0.2448

1.71

35

0.10

-14.8

0.010201

219.04

-1.4948

1.59

52

-0.02

2.2

0.000361

4.84

-0.0418

1.40

41

-0.21

-8.8

0.043681

77.44

1.8392

1.65

45

0.04

-4.8

0.001681

23.04

-0.1968

1.80

48

0.19

-1.8

0.036481

3.24

-0.3438

1.60

40

-0.01

-9.8

0.000081

96.04

0.0882

1.80

42

0.19

-7.8

0.036481

60.84

-1.4898

1.67

48

0.06

-1.8

0.003721

3.24

-0.1098

1.65

54

0.04

4.2

0.001681

17.64

0.1722

1.58

45

-0.03

-4.8

0.000841

23.04

0.1392

1.65

45

0.04

-4.8

0.001681

23.04

-0.1968

1.52

47

-0.09

-2.8

0.007921

7.84

0.2492

1.60

9

-0.01

-40.8

0.000081

1664.64

0.3672

1.85

62

0.24

12.2

0.058081

148.84

2.9402

1.65

55

0.04

5.2

0.001681

27.04

0.2132

1.50

50

-0.11

0.2

0.011881

0.04

-0.0218

1.65

54

0.04

4.2

0.001681

17.64

0.1722

1.69

42

0.08

-7.8

0.006561

60.84

-0.6318

1.70

54

0.09

4.2

0.008281

17.64

0.3822

1.67

48

0.06

-1.8

0.003721

3.24

-0.1098

1.91

82

0.30

32.2

0.090601

1036.84

9.6922

1.62

63

0.01

13.2

0.000121

174.24

0.1452

2.06

84

0.45

34.2

0.203401

1169.64

15.4242

1.63

59

0.02

9.2

0.000441

84.64

0.1932

Average = 1.61

Average = 49.8

0.962850

9550.00

46.8

Result for Correlation = 0.488050598

With this result for the correlation for all the boys and girls in the sample, I have gathered that there is a relatively positive correlation because it is about the middle between 0 and 1 which is neither a no correlation nor a very strong correlation. I have to consider that there are a couple anomalies which could have possibly distorted the means which could in turn alter the PMCC for the whole of the high school.

This graph and calculations have aided me to conclude on my hypothesis including ‘as the height increases, the weight increases.’ This is a basic hypothesis which can be proved by using this scatter graph which clearly illustrates the relationship between the two variables.

This is a scatter graph displaying the heights and weights for all the boys.

There is a definite correlation for these variables; however, there are a few anomalies which are probably mistakes which happened when entering the data. Since product-moment correlation coefficient allows me to view how much this set of data is positive or negative, I will use this to see how positive the relationship is between the variables.

 All Boys Height (m) (x) Weight (kg) (y) x- y- (x-)^2 (y-)^2 (x-)(y- 1.47 50 -0.16 0.8 0.026244 0.64 -0.1296 1.52 32 -0.11 -17.2 0.012544 295.84 1.9264 1.65 52 0.02 2.8 0.000324 7.84 0.0504 1.53 40 -0.10 -9.2 0.010404 84.64 0.9384 1.57 48 -0.06 -1.2 0.003844 1.44 0.0744 1.55 38 -0.08 -11.2 0.006724 125.44 0.9184 1.72 51 0.09 1.8 0.007744 3.24 0.1584 1.66 43 0.03 -6.2 0.000784 38.44 -0.1736 1.32 47 -0.31 -2.2 0.097344 4.84 0.6864 1.32 48 -0.31 -1.2 0.097344 1.44 0.3744 1.60 49 -0.03 -0.2 0.001024 0.04 0.0064 1.55 45 -0.08 -4.2 0.006724 17.64 0.3444 1.65 45 0.02 -4.2 0.000324 17.64 -0.0756 1.80 48 0.17 -1.2 0.028224 1.44 -0.2016 1.60 40 -0.03 -9.2 0.001024 84.64 0.2944 1.80 42 0.17 -7.2 0.028224 51.84 -1.2096 1.67 48 0.04 -1.2 0.001444 1.44 -0.0456 1.60 9 -0.03 -40.2 0.001024 1616.04 1.2864 1.85 62 0.22 12.8 0.047524 163.84 2.7904 1.65 55 0.02 5.8 0.000324 33.64 0.1044 1.50 50 -0.13 0.8 0.017424 0.64 -0.1056 1.91 82 0.28 32.8 0.077284 1075.84 9.1184 1.62 63 -0.01 13.8 0.000144 190.44 -0.1656 2.06 84 0.43 34.8 0.183184 1211.04 14.8944 1.63 59 0.00 9.8 0.000004 96.04 -0.0196 Average = 1.63 Average = 49.2 0.657200 5126 31.84 Result for Correlation = 0.548573697

There is a relatively strong positive correlation for all the boys.

Conclusion

Problems and Limitations

One problem involving the statistical calculations was that I calculated the upper, lower, median and inter-quartile range because I simply forgot that I have to work out 25th, 50th and 75th percentile of the values, so therefore, I went back to those calculations and fixed them. This led to me constructing another box and whisker plot for these averages because they were wrong.

One main limitation is that I could have sampled from a large population. Instead of sampling from 50 students, I think that if I had more time to do this investigation, I would suggest to myself to sample from the entire school or collect a census report to fully reflect a large population. This would allow me to justify the data more accurately and produce better relationships to prove my hypotheses.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

1. ## Statistics GCSE Coursework. Height and weight of pupils. The sampling method I am ...

1.51 85 38 93.5 -8.5 72.25 1.51 85 45 74.5 10.5 110.25 1.51 85 59 20 65 4225 1.51 85 48 63 22 484 1.51 85 40 88.5 -3.5 12.25 1.50 89.5 52 44 45.5 2070.25 1.50 89.5 49 57.5 32 1024 1.50 89.5 39 92 -2.5 6.25 1.50 89.5

2. ## I am going to find out the year 10 male average student at Weavers ...

P.T.O Hypothesis 3 My hypothesis: I think most students in 2009 will be 60kg as I am 50kg and most students are heavier than me. I think students in 1996 will weigh less than 60 kg as they are less tall therefore weigh less 2009 Mean (before finding outliers)

1. ## Edexcel GCSE Statistics Coursework

The first point on the male scatter graph shows us someone who is 1.24M tall weighing in at 43KG. It can be assumed that both these students are in KS3, (years 7-9), due to them being lighter and shorter than most others on the graph.

2. ## For my Statistics coursework I have decided that I will compare weight and height. ...

Systematic sampling This is done by choosing data to sample with in a certain interval. Although it is similar to random sampling it is known to be more efficient. It is more useful for large amounts of data for example if you wanted to get a sample of 40 students out of 200.

1. ## Height and Weight corralarion in boys and girls

Height Distribution between boys and girls The Box plots show that the overall boy's height distribution is more spread out than the girl's height distribution. From the box plot we can see that the boys range is 0.49 m whereas the girl's height range is 0.37 m which means that the girls is more consistent.

2. ## mayfield course work -boys are generally heavier than girl. This has to do with ...

This must have affected the mean. The evidence from the sample suggests that in year group 7-9, 12 boys out of 41 pupils, have a height between 1.6m and 1.69m whilst 7 girls out of the same 41 pupils have a height of 1.6m and 1.69m.

1. ## Maths Data Handling

This suggests that the boys' heights were more spread out than the girls'. The interquartile range for the boys' was 1 cm more than the interquartile range for the mixed population. This implies that the boys' heights are more spread out than the mixed population.

2. ## Testing 3 Hypotheses on Pupils Height and Weight.

I will need to construct a box and whisker diagram. I will then be able to compare the median and interquartile ranges of the different ages. Box and whisker diagrams are good for looking at two different sets of data.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to