Sophie Johnson 10A6 Maths Coursework
Number Grids
The diagram shows a 10*10 grid, a rectangle has been shaded on the 10*10 grid. I will find the diagonal difference between the products of the numbers in the opposite corners of the rectangle.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
Opposite numbers in the rectangle are:- 54 and 66
56 and 64
56*64=3584
54*66=3564
.·. The Diagonal Difference = 3584 - 3564
= 20
Study
I have studied some more 3*2 rectangles and I have found this:-
2
3
4
22
23
24
74
75
76
84
85
86
27
28
29
37
38
39
So from this I conclude that all 3*2 rectangles have a diagonal difference of 20.
After doing this I wondered if this theory would work if I used a 2*3 rectangle.
27
28
37
38
47
48
34
35
44
45
54
55
So I then from this I wondered if larger rectangles had the same diagonal difference from this I found: -
Rectangle
Rows * columns
Diagonal difference
2*3
20
3*4
60
4*5
20
5*6
200
6*7
300
7*8
420
From this I will try to find a formula: -
Rectangle
Rows * columns
Diagonal difference
2*3
20
2*4
Number Grids
The diagram shows a 10*10 grid, a rectangle has been shaded on the 10*10 grid. I will find the diagonal difference between the products of the numbers in the opposite corners of the rectangle.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
Opposite numbers in the rectangle are:- 54 and 66
56 and 64
56*64=3584
54*66=3564
.·. The Diagonal Difference = 3584 - 3564
= 20
Study
I have studied some more 3*2 rectangles and I have found this:-
2
3
4
22
23
24
74
75
76
84
85
86
27
28
29
37
38
39
So from this I conclude that all 3*2 rectangles have a diagonal difference of 20.
After doing this I wondered if this theory would work if I used a 2*3 rectangle.
27
28
37
38
47
48
34
35
44
45
54
55
So I then from this I wondered if larger rectangles had the same diagonal difference from this I found: -
Rectangle
Rows * columns
Diagonal difference
2*3
20
3*4
60
4*5
20
5*6
200
6*7
300
7*8
420
From this I will try to find a formula: -
Rectangle
Rows * columns
Diagonal difference
2*3
20
2*4