• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Non-violence is an effective answer to prejudice. Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


"Non-violence is an effective answer to prejudice." Do you agree? It is possible that non-violence is an effective answer to prejudice because many people such as Gandhi and Martin Luther King have achieved great things through non-violent methods. An example of a non-violent protest by Ghandi is when he continued to throw the ID papers for blacks in South Africa into a fire despite being hit repeatedly by a white policeman. He did this because he believed in Ahimsa (non-violence) and Satyagraha (the truth). The other person who we have learnt about is Martin Luther King. He protested in a non-violent way many times, but one of the most famous was the Montgomery Bus Boycott. This was where black people refused to ride the buses in Montgomery because they were only allowed to ever sit at the back. The boycott lasted about 11 months before the bus companies had lost so much money that they gave in. Some people have a different opinion to the above statement. An example of somebody who has used violence as an effective way to achieve their aims is Tony Blair. ...read more.


In this circumstance I agree as Adolph Hitler was such a dangerous person that the only way to stop him would have been to go to war. He did achieve this which shows that violence can too be an effective way of achieving your aims. Nonetheless, this might not always be the best way of dealing with problems, as Tony Blair's policies in Iraq may have stopped Saddam Hussein but terrorism in both Iraq and this country has increased dramatically causing many deaths. This shows that violence will sometimes make things worse. Even though non-violent protests try to avoid deaths and injuries they can sometimes lead to violent fights which result in many fatalities. An example of a non-violent protest which then became very violent was the Soweto uprising in South Africa on the 16th June 1976. This was when thousands of black children protested about a new law which said they could only be taught in the language Afrikaans. The children protested against the new law by singing songs and waving signs. At first police used gas to try and calm things down, but they then started firing guns. ...read more.


I didn't fight back as I had heard that you should ignore bullies and they would bet bored. I refused to fight back and soon told the teacher what was happening. She then talked to the boys that were bullying me and things got better dramatically. They never tried to hurt me again and although they would still sometimes call me names I didn't care and so just ignored them. Eventually they got bored and left me alone, just like I had been told. I now know that it is a good thing that I didn't retaliate as this would have encouraged them as all they wanted was for me to react. This is an example of an experience of my own where non-violence has proved effective. In conclusion, I believe that wherever possible you should try to use non-violent methods to fight for what is right. Nonetheless there are people who believed that they could only achieve their aims by using violence and did this successfully. They achieved a fairer society and stopped a lot prejudice views. If they hadn't had the courage to fight for they're beliefs people may still today be the victims of serious discrimination and prejudice. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Analyse and explain the non-violence in the life ofM K Gandhi Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi ...

    When the Indians began fighting with each other, Gandhi fasted and risked death to make the point that violence leads to more violence and that the only way forward is through non-violence. Although Gandhi succeeded in removing British rule from India, he was horrified to see the separation of Hindus

  2. Christian Views on Protest and Violence. Many people believe that non-violent protests are very ...

    In Islam, there is a strong emphasis on justice and refusal of oppression; hence, there are times where self-defensive warfare is necessary. What the verses in the Qur'an about warfare do is to provide limitations on how warfare should be carried out.

  1. Christian views on a just war.

    Christians carried out their various beliefs in this war by doing what they thought was right, in both cases many Christians campaigned for the war do stop, others worked as conscientious objectors in Iraq or part of a voluntary medics in Northern Ireland other Christians also fought for what they believed in.

  2. Free essay

    The Role of the Accident Compensation Corporation in the Prevention of Family Violence in ...

    Section 263 of the IPRC recognizes that in fulfilling its primary function to reduce personal injury, the Corporation should seek to: * Create supportive environments that reduce the incidence and severity of personal injury; and * Strengthen community action to prevent personal injury; and * Encourage the development of personal skills that prevent personal injury.

  1. Explore the idea that organisations fail when it comes to supporting domestic abuse survivors ...

    When visiting a local department, the writer found that there was no evidence of support, but leaflets on various other issues i.e. contraception were available, so therefore there is much room for improvement.

  2. Violence : Best Reaction to Violence ?

    Moreover, Bond's philosophy is often transcribed through Lear's speeches: "It is perverted to want your pleasure where it makes others suffer" (I.i.21). Here his daughters, marrying his enemies, have betrayed him. He is the victim of their ambitions. However, here he is once again contradictory because he is doing exactly the opposite of what he is saying.

  1. Biological terrorism.

    One dollar for one bomb doesn't sound very much until you have to replace 10 million people and the property that they own. It isn't the one dollar to make the bomb that is a financial concern, but rather the research that goes in to making these bombs that costs money ("Biological Warfare...").

  2. Analysis of speech extract: Tony Blair

    "People", is 'us'. We are the "people", we are the country, and unless Tony Blair has asked every one of us what exactly it is that we "crave", like much of his speech, his statement, "So people crave stability and order", is opinion, not fact.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work