• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Capital Punishment

Extracts from this document...


Capital Punishment Punishment is defined as a deliberate infliction of harm as a moral sanction against offenders. Punishment may be understood, designed, and applied according to any of the three major varieties of normative theory: retribution and reparation focus on satisfaction of duties, deterrence and prevention on securing desirable outcomes, and reform and rehabilitation on improving moral character. There are different types of punishment, one of these include Capital Punishment, which will be examined at in more detail. Capital Punishment or "state sanctioned killing" said by Wilcockson is the taking of a person's life by the state as the legal penalty for criminal offence. Over the years, capital punishment has become an extremely controversial issue. Many important questions have arisen regarding this issue and some of these include, "how should a criminal be punished?" Also, "do criminals really deserve to be punished harshly using the death penalty?" People disagree about whether capital punishment is moral or if it is effective in discouraging crime. Many oppose the death penalty because they consider it cruel. Critics also believe that there is a risk of executing mistakenly convicted people. Supporters of the death penalty believe that in some instances, people who take another human life deserve to forfeit their own lives. Many supporters also argue that the threat of death discourages crime. In the UK, capital punishment is illegal unless a person has committed high treason, however other countries such as the United States allow for the death penalty to be carried out as a form of punishment. On average 75 executions occur each year throughout the United States. As you may be aware by now, there are many philosophical and ethical problems regarding this issue. In order for us to understand the concept of the dilemma, we need to examine it by using two ethical theories, which will enable us to deliver an evaluation of the dilemma. ...read more.


Mill maintained that the well being of the individual was of great importance and that happiness is most effectively gained when individuals are free to pursue their own ends, subject to rules that protect the common good of all. While Mill accepted the utility principle of the greatest good for the greatest number, he was concerned about the difficulty raised in the example of the s******c guards, "s******c guards torture a wrongly imprisoned innocent man." If the greatest good for the greatest number were purely quantitative, based on the quantities of pleasure and pain caused, what would stop one person's pleasure from being completely extinguished if the majority gained pleasure from that act? To address this difficulty, Mill focused on qualitative pleasures. He developed a system of higher and lower pleasures, preferring the higher pleasures to the lower ones: "it is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied." (Mill, 1863, chapter 2). Mill maintained that the pleasures of the mind were higher than those of the body. There's a link between the two, as to be able to enjoy poetry or art, we need to eat and drink in order to survive. Nevertheless, Mill clearly believed that to pursue purely bodily pleasures- food, drink, drugs and s*x- were not as high an objective as those that are intellectually demanding. When confronted with a choice between a pleasure of the body and a pleasure of the mind, that of the mind is to be preferred. For the utilitarian all suffering is intrinsically evil. So if punishment involves suffering then punishment involves an evil. This is a strike against punishment for utilitarianism, and punishment would have to be outlawed if other reasons cannot be adduced in its favor. For utilitarianism, societies should punish criminals only if punishment is a cost-effective method of social control - of reducing or eliminating crime. ...read more.


Some pain is good for us- its there for a reason, but can we say the same about capital punishment? Can we really say that a criminal deserves to go through all that pain and suffering especially if he truly repents for what he had done? John Coffee did not deserve to go through all that pain and suffering. A third difficulty concerns the issue of justice. While utilitarianism ensures a maximum-pleasure result, it doesn't set out how that pleasure is distributed. It ensures that the most people receive pleasure, but it guarantees nothing for minorities for example the family of the person being executed. There's nothing in utilitarianism that prevents the total sacrifice of one pleasure for the benefit of the whole. Maclyntyre notes that utilitarianism could justify horrendous acts as being for the pleasure of the many. I.e: Capital punishment. A fourth difficulty is utilitarianisms failure to consider different views on what happiness is. It asserts that there's common agreement about what brings pleasure and what brings pain. This can be challenged on many levels. There are people who are different and find pleasure in experiencing pain, referring back to the Green Mile when the guard asked Coffee if he wanted to escape, he replied that he would not do a foolish thing and he wanted to get the execution over and done with because he was sick of life and sick of the amount of pain he saw in the world. Therefore to conclude, the usefulness of the death penalty to society from a utilitarian perspective cannot be determined apart from a great deal of empirical data which we do not now have. Does it really act as a deterrent? Is it less costly than life in prison? Does it result in more happiness than unhappiness? . It might make society as a whole happier to know that a murderer can never again kill, and it may infact make the murderer himself less unhappy than life without parole. Capital Punishment essay Sukaina Ibrahim ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Death Penalty Opinion.

    Should our country's justice system continue to let violent criminals back on the streets where they are likely to commit murder again? Of course not. The death penalty ultimately saves precious lives and serves a definite purpose. However in order to serve its purpose it must be adjusted and made more effecive and efficient.

  2. Critically evaluate arguments for and against the death penalty.

    of being charged and sentenced to the death penalty was influenced by the race of the victim. It was found that "those who murdered whites were more likely to be sentenced to death than those who murdered black victims"15. These statistics show that there seems to be quite severe discrimination

  1. Free essay

    "Death is nothing to us." How good are the Epicurean arguments for this ...

    will not feel threatened by time and death as it would not give you anything you don't have already. They believe that pleasure is equal with time and view happiness as absolute and that it could not be measured as more or less if it is the true kind of happiness.

  2. Dead man walking - Film analysis

    They manage to avoid the fact that Matthew would be executed that day. This was possible because they all found it too awkward to talk about in front of him, or because they simply want their last moments together as a family to be happy.

  1. Capital Punishment

    them but without the law changing it wont make a difference to anyone. Heffer refers to Huntley by writing in his article: "After his sick, vicious act of cruelty, that he does not deserve to live. There is quite simply no reason to keep Huntley alive."

  2. Capital Punishment; Good or Bad?

    The final criteria used was authority, or who runs the site. This is the only part of the criteria that did not satisfy me. It is not clearly stated at any place on the site, who runs the site. However, they do offer an email address to respond to the site.

  1. Should capital punishment be brought back in the U.K.

    successful career which I think is a just punishment for what he has done, if capital punishment was not used and if he did stay in prison for the whole of his life which would be unlikely, then he would be still alive and may commit crimes in prison, the

  2. "Reformation is the best punishment" How far do you agree ?

    Some Christians believe we should use another punishment like the death penalty because it might be necessary evil and if reformation doesn?t always work then it could be a slippery slope effect, another punishment like the death penalty would be better because it offers protection to society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work