Dead man walking - Film analysis

Authors Avatar

Dead man walking - Film analysis coursework

For many years, the death penalty has been a punishment for severe crimes. However, the law has long moved on since then, and more humane ways of death have been devised for the few states where the death penalty is still legal. Lethal injection is now the main way of carrying out the penalty, and Texas is the state that uses it most. It is a very controversial punishment and the moral issues of it have been debated for a very long time. Many protests have been made to try and change this law, and they have been successful in most countries. The film ‘Dead man walking’ is set in the state of Louisiana, near Texas and re-enacts an ethical case where a decision whether to sentence a murder to death or not has to be made.

During the film we can never be certain whether Tim Robbins is in favour, or against the death penalty. He uses very effective methods to represent both sides of this moral argument. For example, his methods include his choice of the character Matthew Poncelet, his choice of Sister Helen Prejean, sound effects and music, flashbacks, characters viewpoints, costumes and many more. One of the most important of these techniques is the way he has decided to present his main character, Sister Helen Prejean.

The first time we see Helen Prejean is when she is driving to the ‘Hope House’ in her car. There is happy music in the background, which is another media technique used by director Tim Robbins to suggest to us that she is a likeable person. Also, there is scene skipping, between her driving, and a video of her confirmation. We can tell it is a video because it has a sepia effect, and has fewer frames per a second. The scene of Helen driving uses mainly a close up camera shot, possibly because the director wants to stress on Helen’s cheerful face. Later on, she reads the first letter from Matthew Poncelet, which is narrated by him. He is asking Helen for some legal help, because his lawyer ‘seems to have disappeared’. Even while Matthew’s letter is being narrated, the cheerful music is still playing, but very quietly in the background. This is done on purpose by the director to show us that there is still some good in Matthew Poncelet. The music stops after the reading of Poncelet’s second letter, when Helen meets Chaplain Farley to talk about the job she is about to face.

When Matthew Poncelet is first introduced to us, he is on death row. From his letter to Sister Helen Prejean, we start to feel early sympathy for him, as he talks about how scared he is, for example when he explains his dream about God as a chef, ready to kill and eat him. Also, he denies responsibility for the murders for which he was placed on death row. This too sways the balance of the death penalty to against, because we feel he in being treated unjustly. Tim Robbins does this with an interesting media technique, as a voiceover, from when Helen is in her car. The first impression we get of him is very important, because it allows us to feel for him throughout the film. However, the director tries not to allow you to come to a conclusion on the death penalty so early on; instead he shows scenes of Matthew Poncelet, which portray him as a cold hearted killer. We see flashbacks of him and Carl Vitello raping and murdering Hope Percy and Walter Delacroix. The flashbacks we see are very disturbing and we are back to a neutral position on the death penalty argument. This is a motif that occurs throughout the film, allowing us to feel sympathy for both Matthew, and the families of those that were killed, with taking one side too strongly. The choice of actor that the director chose to play Matthew is also very important, particularly the way he looks. He looks like a stereotypical criminal, because of his large muscular build and intimidating face. His outer image makes him seem very tough, and when we see him cry, we feel for him even more, as we think it must take a lot to make such a proud and egotistical man cry.

Join now!

Sister Helen Prejean first meets Matthew Poncelet on death row, when he is desperate for someone to talk to about his sentence. However, Helen already knew a bit about Matthew from the letter that he wrote her. During the build up to their first face to face meeting, while Helen is walking into death row, we see some more scene skipping. The director keeps skipping from her walking to the incident where the murders took place. Helen’s face, while walking through the gates, looked very nervous. The camera uses a medium-close shot, and tracking Sister Helen as she walked. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay