There are two sides of the coin in relation to death penalty. In this essay I will analyse both the arguments for and against its use in modern society.

Firstly we must consider points that are for death penalty. The main advantage of this punishment is that it is deterrent. This means that when someone kill other person and would be put to death penalty, other murders would be afraid about theirs lives and might not kill anyone again.

        Another good point of the death penalty is that it is cheaper. It is cheaper to put someone to death penalty than keep him in prison because the costs of living in prison are dearer as the prisoner has to eat something, he uses electricity etc. The resources say that one year spent in prison for one guy cost over $10.000 while death penalty not more than $500.

Join now!

        Thirdly it is justice. Some people say that death penalty is the best punishment if someone kills another person. As Lex Talionis says eye for eye, tooth for tooth. An example of this could be the last president of Iraq Saddam Hussein who was  by  after being convicted of  by the  following  for the murder of 148 Iraqi  in the town of  in 1982 in retaliation for an assassination attempt against him. Among the public the death penalty was the best option of punishment for Saddam Hussein.

        The last advantage of death penalty is that it is no reoffending. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay