• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does the community have an interest in whether a marriage should be preserved or dissolved and, if so, why?

Extracts from this document...


Family Law 1LAW600 " Dissolution of marriage ought always to require a real exercise of judgement by the court, acting on the community's behalf". [Putting Asunder: The report of a group appointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury in January 1964, paragraph 48] Does the community have an interest in whether a marriage should be preserved or dissolved and, if so, why? Should the dissolution of a marriage be a private matter for the parties concerned? Why should the court be required to exercise judgement in such matters? In regards to the communities interest the above statement was made in 1964, the perception and interest of marriage the communities had then, is rather different to today's day and ages. It has been accepted in the English law that marriage is a union between man and women. This view is very much an ancient yet significant view although it may well be said, in accordance with recent case law that is been tipped away. Lord Penzance in Hyde v Hyde (1866) stated " I conceive that marriage, as understood in Christendom...be defined as the voluntary union for life of man and one woman to the exclusion of all others1" This statement can be can be criticised on the basis that It only defines marriage in relation to Christianity and that its use in contemporary society may well be discriminatory as it lacks the capacity to provide for the great increase in religion and cultural diversity. In today's day and age in society, marriage is a concept that has evolved and further need for clarity is needed, and when we discuss community, it needs to be established what and which communities interest is to be preserved. Section 11(C) of the MCA 19732 provides that both parties to a marriage must be respectively male and female, without which the marriage would be void. In the recent case of Goodwin (2002)3, the P had obtained a sex change from male to female due to her lack of recognition. ...read more.


There has been considerable public debate on this matter, with opinion divided upon whether the proposals would make divorce too easy and undermine marriage. Most commentators felt, however, that reform was long overdue and hoped that the provisions of the Family Law Act 1996 were going to address the problem of the past. Further criticism of the present system concerns the enormous financial cost of protracted litigation for the public purse, and there are those that have suggested that legal aid should be withdrawn in contested divorce cases and ancillary relief applications. Others suggest that it should only be available if the parties agree to conciliation. Conciliation is a process whereby an impartial and trained individual meets with the parties and encourages them to reach an agreement on areas of dispute such as a financial provision and arrangements for the children. This reduces bitterness, saves costs and has an important role in making divorce less traumatic and adversarial. Conciliation may take place in court, and in 1971 a Practice Direction allowed courts to refer cases to the court's welfare office if it was thought he could help with a conciliation process. Initially, pilot schemes were established, but have spread throughout the country and allow emotional and possibly confrontational issues to be handled in a constructive manner. Conciliation is now compulsory in cases involving arrangements for children and s8 orders when the parties must meet with the welfare officer together with their legal advisers and any children over nine to try to reach an agreement. Criticism have been made, in that the parties often feel under pressure to reach an agreement in a short time, and it is very important that the parties are legally represented and kept fully informed. The law commission and the Green Paper did not suggest making conciliation compulsory in all divorces, as it is its voluntary nature that ensures c0-opertation and a willingness to reach an agreement. ...read more.


Cohabitants should have some form of protection but that merely cannot be compared to the protection married couples have. Marriage is a lifetime contract and commitment; implanting cohabitation rights into legislation could in turn affect society's morals and values. Although times are changing, we should not forget tradition as that itself does play a big role in our lively hood. Taking a chauvinist approach it would appear then men would be in a better position if they have a cohabitation relationship then a marriage. As for a married man continuing to live with a partner, marriage is not a distinguishable condition, as there are no benefits over cohabitation; for a married women continuing to live with a partner, there are marginal benefits over cohabitation, but only obtained on the death of a man such as the widow's benefits, available for those women aged 45+. Again for a married man whose marriage ends in divorce, there is usually more serious damage to his life then if he had cohabited. For those married fathers with children, the damage may be very serious, however for a married women whose marriage ends in divorce, there are considerable benefits compared with cohabitants. Women now almost automatically obtain custody of children no matter what their behaviour, and also profit financially from divorce. This can be interpreted by Judicial Static's Annual Report 199312, in which the divorce cases that year was 162,579, and the divorces granted by gender to women was 112,000 (71%) and men 45.000 (29%). It could be stated that the 'dissolution of marriage ought always to require a real exercise of judgement by the court, acting on the Community's behalf' is not well maintained. Those who drafted the ECHR including Article 12, granting the right of "men and women to... marry" must have done so on the understanding that the step " to marry" would * Result in the individual being in a distinguishable condition from cohabitation; * And that it would provide the individual with substantive benefits and protection not available in cohabitation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Family, Marriage and Divorce section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Family, Marriage and Divorce essays

  1. In your opinion, what are the advantages and disadvantages of polygamous marriages? Do ...

    A husband with many wives would not have to worry about this. I think that it is very possible that polygamy would lower divorce rate in our society today. This is because, if a man is not finding that his marriage is going how he wants it to and he

  2. What impact does divorce and separation have on children and what effect has this ...

    Then finally, after conducting a pilot study for my "structured interview" I will note any changes I am making. To conduct my investigation, I am going to use three methods. My primary sources will be built upon two case studies (using an in- depth interview and convert observation), and oral

  1. Does Marriage Have a Place in Today's Society?

    The effect of a divorce on a child/children can be very severe. In severe cases the child/children have turned to crime, drugs, alcohol and/or smoking to ease their pain, although this hasn't happened to any victims of divorce that I know.

  2. Why are marriage rates declining?

    " I think that the main reason for increasing divorce rates is that couples aren't willing to give it another chance. Because it is easy to get a divorce people see it as a an easy way out." My fourth interview was 28-year-old Hema > Why do you think that women are choosing their careers instead of getting married?

  1. Marriages are an outdated institution.

    The amount of things you need to do for a wedding are endless for example church, flowers, reception, food and that isn't the half of it. Everything costs money and takes too much time to organize. You don't have anyone else telling you what to do.

  2. Religion and Relationships

    or a woman occupying (for example, nurse, and primary school teacher). Also another reason for people agreeing with the statement is that in all religions all Prophets and most people of importance are depicted as men; this importance of men in religions may make people think that men are more superior to women.

  1. Outline and discuss the view that the rise in divorce rates since the 1970's ...

    family as the women has effectively taken over both roles, leaving him to feel useless. The fact that women's roles have changed has also meant that they are less dependant on male support, thus if caught up in an empty shell marriage it would be easier to leave as they

  2. Religion and human relationships Religion and medical ethics - views of Christians and Moslems.

    Christian principles of compassion might be expressed, or Roman Catholic views about the permanence of the marriage sacrament. Religion and Equality Islam teaches that Allah created everyone equal. The Koran says that ?all men and women are created from a single soul, Surah 4:1?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work