Has science made the Bible a useless document?

Authors Avatar

“The Bible has been disproved by scientific theories and is therefore a useless document”. Discuss (5)

Most Christians’ agreement or disagreement with this statement would depend on whether they were literalist Christians or non-literalist Christians, but what both these groups would agree on is that although the Bible may or may not have been disproved in part by scientific theory, this most certainly does not make it a useless document. Literal Christians would say that the Bible has not been disproved by science, and the events which are written about are completely true and are taken from real life. Although these may seem impossible to our limited human knowledge, as God is omnipotent he can make the seemingly impossible happen. Non-literal Christians would say that as the Bible is the direct Word of God I contains truths not comprehensible to our human minds, and therefore some events are depicted through myths and metaphors, meaning the events depicted in some places in the Bible could be disproved by science, as the events did not truly exist. However, they would still not argue that the bible is a useless document, as it is the Word of God and often provides much-needed comfort to those in distress.

Join now!

However, other people might argue that as scientific theories which are now widely accepted to be fact, such as evolution, contradict the Bible in many places, the rest of it cannot be trusted to be accurate and therefore as it has no historical or scientific accuracy it is a useless document. Taking my previously mentioned example of evolution, as science has proved through the discovery of fossils and Darwin’s theory of evolution, the world as we know it would have taken millions of years to be formed, not be created in 6 days as the Bible states in Genesis, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay