• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How can you or your society decide ethically which knowledge should or should not be pursued?

Extracts from this document...


THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE ESSAY: Name: Matthew Jackson School: Wesley College Glen Waverly Campus Candidate number: D0612-011 Topic: How can you or your society decide ethically which knowledge should or should not be pursued? Word count: 1599 HOW CAN YOU OR YOUR SOCIETY DECIDE ETHICALLY WHICH KNOWLEDGE SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT BE PURSUED? In modern society there is a constant pursuit of knowledge. With the relentless momentum that our quest for knowledge has in modern times it is necessary to distinguish exactly what knowledge can be ethically sought. Given the many conflicting schools of philosophy that dictate to us what is and is not ethical, it is difficult to determine what is the best way for us to decide, but while all methods are flawed, there is doubtless one technique that is the least so, this we shall determine. This problem has been pertinent to science of late, given recent advances into the field of stem-cell research, though its is relevant to many areas of knowledge: sensitive research in history or the ethicality of a psychology experiment. However deciding whether the pursuit of knowledge is ethical does not have to be nearly so broad-reaching, it relates to the emotive ways of knowing as much as the perceptive: I was talking with Tom1, a friend of mine. ...read more.


It was a German philosopher Immanuel Kant, who created an entirely new school of ethics in "Kantian" ethics. Under Kantian ethics, rational moral individuals have a certain intrinsic value, and so cannot be weighed on a scale as Utilitarian ethics suggest. Kantianism holds that individuals should not be sacrificed for the common good. Finally, it argues that motive is of the utmost importance, i.e. an action is unethical regardless of its outcome, if its initial intent was malicious. Closely linked to Kantian ethics is the 'natural rights theory' that is, that rational beings have intrinsic rights, the right to live, the right to freedom, property. Few ethicists can agree on exactly what these 'rights' are. Under these the ethicality of stem cell research depends on both whether you regard a foetus as a moral being, thereby privy to rights and liberties and whether you regard the research as violating those rights. My relationship problem is less controversial, in undertaking a relationship with Sal she has trusted me with her feelings, and has the right to have that trust honoured, and it would violate her right to hurt her. Ethical theories that imply a set of natural rights are indeed well merited, but as with utilitarianism it is a flawed ideology. ...read more.


Obviously this system has its faults: first some of the criteria are not pertinent to every decision. Also it is sometimes difficult for all parties concerned to participate: for example if one were to decide on the ethicality of aborting a foetus, then the decision concerns the potential person in question, but they are unable to submit their opinion. Likewise if we were to consider my initial example of my girlfriend, then the decision concerns both her and Warwick certainly, but if I were to ask them to offer their opinion on the ethicality of the matter, then the decision would be made already. These faults are simply something inherent to the method, and must be tolerated, they are not ideal, but neither are they so gross as to invalidate the system totally. The system has many merits and despite its faults is likely the best proposal here, basing the system around principals rather than theories makes the system simpler for the layman, less controversial for the philosophers, and flexible in its application. I feel that the best way to make an decision on the pursuit of knowledge, or for that matter any ethical dilemma is to weigh it against the principals which are set out above, but all techniques are flawed in some way and it is the prerogative of any rational being to make her own choice. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Religion and Medical Ethics

    from the husband and wife, ie using In-Vitro Fertilisation or Artificial Insemination by Husband, as using a donor (AID or Surrogacy) means that the couple are not bonded by the fact that they created a child together and so, may not be as loving a relationship.

  2. Euthanasia can never be justified

    The Christian belief that you should treat others as you wish to be treated yourself and the principle of agape (Christian love for one another) may over rule the sanctity of life and euthanasia may be considered the most loving action.

  1. which are the best ways to achieve knowledge?

    For example, we all know that if we throw a ball into the air we can expect it to fall back down, and that is because we have received this information through our senses, we have seen it happen many times so we expect it to do the same.

  2. RE crousework topic 9

    (Quran 2:271) Donating without others knowing is in some situations better for the charitable person, because it may shield their affection to give, and in some cases it may also benefit the receiver of the charity because it let's them hold onto their dignity and honour.

  1. Different religious and philosophical views on controversial topics.

    compelled to give on one day of the year, if your society needs an event such as comic relief to get any charity whatsoever then it will be nigh on impossible for them to escape to nirvana. Utilitarian A utilitarian would say that comic relief in itself is right because

  2. "Medical research in the U.K. is being suffocated by excessive governance and ethical review".

    users and committee members needed to be achieved.19 The main conclusion reached by the group, which were published in June 2005 was that NHS research needed to be more efficient and punctual. It was stated that in order to achieve these vital factors the committees must be focused on ethical

  1. Should our moral beliefs be based on the utilitarian principle of securing the greatest ...

    Looking back to the downloading illegal contents example, although the action can provide convenience and reduced cost to people, which is a good consequence overall. However, the intention of the action is wrong, therefore according to Kant's theory, the action is wrong.

  2. "The greatest happiness for the greatest number" Using ToK thinking and terms, how far ...

    Once they are done they put her back where they left her, so that she never finds out what happened. These photos that are taken are then distributed over the Internet so other paedophiles can gain pleasure from them. According to a utilitarian their actions would be justified because it

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work