• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Morality, therefore, is more properly felt than judg'd of'. How does Hume reach this conclusion? Do you accept his argument?

Extracts from this document...


Tutorial Essay Question One Write an essay of not more than 1,000 words in answer to one of the following questions. The essay is to be handed in at the next tutorial. 1. 'Morality, therefore, is more properly felt than judg'd of'. How does Hume reach this conclusion? Do you accept his argument? 2. How does the is-ought gap relate to Hume's attack on those who think reason is the basis of moral distinctions? Reading: Hume, D. A Treatise of Human Nature, Book III, Part 1, Sections 1 and 2. 'Morality, therefore, is more properly felt than judg'd of'. How does Hume reach this conclusion? Do you accept his argument? In his Treatise of Human Nature, David Hume outlines his theory of human morality. Hume's argument is that human morality is not based on rational thought and reason, but rather is a consequence of our passions. Due to the fact that passions themselves can never present themselves as the product of any sort of reasoning, it would be illogical to ever judge a moral action as rational or irrational. ...read more.


Hume maintains that if moral distinctions were based on relations discovered by reason, then non-reasoning and even inanimate objects would be capable of vice and virtue. For instance, it is morally wrong for a son to murder his father. However, "let us chuse any inanimate object, such as an oak or elm; and let us suppose, that by the dropping of its seed, it produces a sapling below it, which springing up by degrees, at last overtops and destroys the parent tree". The relations involved in the sapling killing the parent tree, and the son killing his father are the same. If relations alone were what constituted right and wrong, then the sapling would be guilty of murder - even if it was claimed that the sapling had no choice, as the relations would be the same. Another way in which reason could distinguish between right and wrong is by discovering a fact in an agent's character that makes their act virtuous or vicious. However, this is also not possible, according to Hume, as facts in the mind of a person are only vicious if the thoughts are actually implemented. ...read more.


Reason can never motivate, by itself, whereas morality is, Hume seems to say, intrinsically motivating, at least to some degree. His argument is as follows: 1. The judgment that some act is wrong, or that some passion is vicious, is intrinsically motivating in the sense that a person so judges only if she is motivated (or would be under certain conditions) against the action or passion to some degree. 2. Reason can only lead us to beliefs that such-and-such is the case, and no such belief is intrinsically motivating in this sense. 3. Therefore, no moral judgment can derive from reason. To say then, that morality is "more properly felt than judg'd of" is not the same as endorsing emotivism or non-cognitivism. It is simply to recognize the crucial role of sentiment in practical moral discovery. More generally, claiming that reason is unable to accomplish practical moral discovery is not the same as to claim that it has no role in the discovery of morals, that morals are invented rather than discovered, or that so-called moral judgments are not really judgments at all. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Explain the differences between relative morality and absolute morality.

    there is an underlying common denominator beneath all moral codes existing in different cultures. In almost every society there is a hatred of crimes such as unecessary killing [murder], theft and abuse. However the interpretation of these is different in different cultures.

  2. TOK Essay: Reason and Emotion

    However this claim is not reasonable at all, it might seem reasonable but it is not. It is not reasonable because any claim such as this arises from some type of emotions.

  1. Gap between reason and emotion

    Moreover, emotions are also showed in this video by showing the little babies and children that are affected by the flood in the different places in the world.

  2. Aristotle - Virtue Ethics Essay

    It is favourable in some ways to solving moral dilemmas because it is rational, consistent and utterly impartial because Kant does not look favourably upon the role of emotion in the making of moral decisions.

  1. Explain and discuss one critique of the link between religion and morality

    These people are therefore shaping their religion around their own morality rather than shaping their morality around their religion, and therefore the link is weakened. Another part of the attack on the link between religion and morality is that the actual moral systems that religions have and the effect this has on the world which is not always morally right.

  2. I have raised myself to a state of affluence and some degree of reputation ...

    Nevertheless, as time elapses in the following pages of his autobiography, we find that though Franklin should be applauded for his accomplishments, he should also be condemned for attaining them through manipulation and dishonesty. In fact, the actions he makes directly conflicts with his noble belief that "...Truth, Sincerity, and

  1. The philosophy of morality.

    Both these theories have their problems. With individual relativism moral debate becomes impossible, because if you accept that the individual may be wrong, you cannot agree with individual relativism as according to this theory the individual cannot be wrong, also individuals could not improve or reform if they were to change their minds. Bertrand Russell (1935)

  2. What is the relationship between religion and morality?

    Some people favour autonomy because they believe that people obey religious rules out of fear of punishment. Therefore, they are not free to make a moral choice, and are motivated by fear. In addition, autonomy would seem a plausible theory because of the diverse religions in society, which all hold different moral rules.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work