Section C: Evaluation of sources:
Source A
Source A (see appendix 9) is a picture taken on a trip I took to Bernburg, it shows one of the gas chambers. The picture is part of the room which shows the showers in Bernburg. This was a particularly useful Primary source, because I have family members who were running less illicit projects which were indirectly connected to the T4 project. The reason behind the thought to why the Nazi’s killed so many people in the most inhuman and dirty manner was beyond anything. Reasons for the usefulness of this source is it shows the setup that Nazi’s did to make it look like a harmless shower room more than a merciless compartment of death. On the top right it is noticed that there is a shower head, meaning all those who travelled in here should not have had any reason to think they were about to die, which remained fairly true but if there was a leakage of news to others some people would know they were going to their deaths. At first glance it looks normal; it would not seem likely that the showers would emit pure Carbon monoxide gas. Another use of this source is the portrayal of the Nazi’s tactics to lure people into these institutions. Another key usefulness for this sources shows that the idea of showers releasing gas did not begin in the concentration camps but in the various Euthanasia institutions. the limitations of this source is that is shows only part of the chamber and thus cannot get a clear image of how convincing these “shower rooms” actually were and also it does not clearly show how many people could fit in such room to be killed. Also although this is a previous gas chamber the picture was taken recently and there may have been alterations done to the chambers to slide the thoughts of many people into thinking one way.
Source B:
The video source (refer to appendix 8) is Firsthand account of Robert Wagemanns near to death experience at the euthanasia camps. It is highly useful in respect to it being a primary source which is a significant bonus for a historian. In the video there are several useful events. A very useful one is that of the facial expression of Robert Wagemann. His eyes were full of fear and this made it hard for him which it must have done for him to relive his confrontation with death at his very young. He gives much great firsthand information about how euthanasia was worked and what sought of methods they used to kill the people.
This source has great use for historians in trying to capture the emotion and thought process of the man. During the video Wagemann states that they were “summoned” and that the doctors 1st examined him and after decided to euthanize him because he had some sought of Physical retardation. The limitations of this source are the Language gap that Wagemann had to contend with. He could not fully express himself as well in English as he could in his native tongue German. This video source is also made 52 years after the incident happened and specific details may have been lost. Later on in the video he states that “from then on we really went into hiding because now we knew what they were really after us,” The use of the word ‘us’ could be interpreted as many things but it still quite useful in establishing what happened from 1939-1941.
Section D
Euthanasia was an idea that came about in the 1850’s. Although the German government had previously had the plan of eliminating mentally and physically ill, but they failed to ever initiate it.In 1920 two professors, Alfred Hoch M.D. at the university of Freiburg and Karl Binding a Professor of law in the university of Leipzig wrote a book titled “Die Freigabe der Vernichtung lebenunwerten Lebens.” Unlike most people they didn’t have the common harsh Nazi idea of exterminating the mentally and physically ill, but instead they said that the parent and patients should have the choice to choose whether or not they want to live or not. The professors also suggested that if the mentally or physically challenged people indeed were killed that the money that was taken from the individuals be issued to those people that were both physically and socially able. Again in 1920 a poll was created to test the opinions of different people. It was showed that 73% of parents, guardians and so forth of all the harshly disabled people, approved of the idea of euthanasia and would also allow that the lives of their children be ended too. However it was clear that both definitions for Euthanasia were in fact different. Their definition of euthanasia stated that it was the inducement of a painless death for a chronically or terminally ill individual.On the other side the Nazi definition stated that it was a systematic killing of the institutionalised mentally and physically handicapped, without the knowledge of their family members. In about July of 1939 the planning of euthanasia was said to have commenced. However they did not kill the physically and mentally disabled, instead they had criteria and whoever had a similarity to that criteria were sterilized which amounted to 400 hundred thousand by 1943. “Baby Krauer”was the first actual case of euthanasia within Germany. Herr Krauer actually personally wrote a letter to Hitler asking him to kill her child. Hitler then turned the case over to his physician. Later in 1938 her request was granted and so did the beginning of the Nazi Euthanasia program. As a result in 1939 Hitler ordered that the mentally and physically challenged be killed. This lead to hospitals Starving or overdosing their patients and in the following year six gassing camps were established around Germany. Later in August 1941 Hitler halted the euthanasia program due to the general public complaints and protests about the killings. However this did not mean the end of euthanasia in 1942 but the killing resumed but this was not done with regular gassing techniques but with newly started idea of lethal injections or overdose, although some still carried on starving their victims. Euthanasia went on all through the 2nd world war and ended along side with it, however this time they included a greater range of fatalities such as Bombing victims and foreign labourer. In Karl Brandt’s, head of the T4 opinion, Hitler individually permitted gas as being the most “humane” process of mass extermination.
Section E
In conclusion to all the evidence provided that the Euthanasia program was a great indicator for the later establishment of the concentration camps for the Jews. In my opinion the Euthanasia was to an extent not a distinctive Nazi policy but merely a quick and easy cover for Hitler’s hatred for Jews. What Hitler did certainly did not follow the definition for euthanasia and can be said that he manipulated it to his own version of euthanasia but the original euthanasia cannot be credited to the Nazi policy. The involuntary euthanasia of children and adolescents who were mentally or physically challenged, although considered murder was still in the constraints of the euthanasia policy. Hitler’s aims for this was not the extermination of mentally disabled but more the cleansing of Jews from the German infrastructure. Hitler intended on establishing an “arichen Herrenvolk” which was known as the Aryan race, the race without impure blood or disabilities. He did so once in the late 1930’s and the same idea carried through to the concentration camps for Jews later on.
Word count: 2190
Section F: Bibliography
Primary:
-
Lecture by, Aaron Sternetzky, Gedenkstätte Bernburg
-
“Euthanasia Program.” United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Washington, D.C.<http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/media_oi.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005200&MediaId=1208>
Secondary:
- "Action T4." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 4 Oct 2007, 06:48 UTC. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 11 Oct 2007 <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Action_T4&oldid=162190473
-
King, PJ. Lessons from History: Euthanasia in Nazi Germany.1996
-
Madden , J. S.. “Euthanasia in Nazi Germany Psychiatric Bulletin” (2000)
-
“Euthanasia Program.” United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Washington, D.C.<>
-
Cook, <http://www.bbc.co.uk/ouch/closeup/holocaust/>
Appendices:
Appendix 1:
(Source: http://www.edjewnet.de/aktion_t4/index.htm)
Gesetzes zur Verhütung erbkranken Nachwuchses, das mit dem 1. Januar 1943 in Kraft trat.
1. Wer erbkrank ist kann durch chirurgischen Eingriff unfruchtbar gemacht
(sterilisiert) werden, wenn nach den Erfahrungen der ärztlichen Wissenschaft mit Grosser
Wahrscheinlichkeit zu erwarten ist, das sein Nachkommen an schweren körplichen oder
geistigen Erbschäden leiden werd.
2. Erbkrank im Sinne dieses Gesetzes ist, wer an einer der folgenden Krankheiten leidet:
1)angeborener Shwachsinn
2) Schizophrenie
3) zirkulärem (manischdepressivem) Irresein
4) erblicher Fallsucht
5) erblichem Veitstanz (Huntingtonshe Chorea)
6) erblicher Blindheit
7) erblicher Taubheit
8) schwerer erblicher körperlicher Missbuildung.
9) Fermer kann unfruchtbar gemacht werden, wer an schwerem Alkoholismus leidet.
Appendix 2
The Krauer baby was suffering from blindness, was mentally handcapped, and was missing
an arm and a leg.
Appendix 3
(Image Obtained from: )
Appendix 4:
(Image Obtained from: http://www.deathcamps.org/euthanasia/pic/bigbernburgtable.jpg)
Appendix 5
(Image Obtained from: My visit to Bernburg)
Appendix 6
(Source Obtained from: http://www.deathcamps.org/euthanasia/pic/bigbernburgtable.jpg)
“I would be very thankful, if I could receive information about what took place with our
poor brother during the final time. If he had perhaps a difficult death? It was certainly
difficult for us siblings that we could not visit him on his deathbed.” Anon
Appendix 7
(Source Obtained from: http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/focus/disabilities_02/disabilities.php)
“I put my husband in your faithful hands. You promised me in the most generous way that I
might come to you for every need…Help me please. Tell me the place I can turn to, so that
my husband can return.” Anon
Appendix 8
(Source Obtained from: http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/media_oi.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005200&MediaId=1208)
“My mom and I were summoned to a, a part of the university clinic in Heidelberg, in
Schlierheim, and there I was examined. And during the examination my mom was sitting
on the outside of the room, and she overheard a conversation that the doctors would do
away with me, uh, would ab… would abspritz me, which means that they would give me a
needle and put me to sleep. My mom overheard the conversation, and, uh, during lunch
Time, while the, uh, doctors were gone, she, uh, grabbed hold of me, we went down to
Neckar river into the high reeds and there she put my clothes on, and from there on we really
went into hiding because now we knew that they were really after us. So, uh, we went to
my father’s father’s house where we also stayed until I started school.”10
Appendix 9
(Image Obtained from: My visit to Bernburg) Gas chambers
"Action T4." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 4 Oct 2007, 06:48 UTC. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 11 Oct 2007 <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Action_T4&oldid=162190473>.
Cook, <http://www.bbc.co.uk/ouch/closeup/holocaust/>
“Euthanasia Program.” United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Washington, D.C.<>
King, PJ. Lessons from History: Euthanasia in Nazi Germany.1996
“Euthanasia Program.” United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Washington, D.C.<>
“Euthanasia Program.” United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Washington, D.C.<>
“Euthanasia Program.” United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Washington, D.C.<>