This is a preview of the whole essay
Peer Reviews
Here's what a star student thought of this essay
Quality of writing
The format of the table should be a proper table as it is quite hard to read the different values and what they mean from the one given. Spaces for headings should be consistent e.g. the conclusion one looks untidy and they should be in bold to separate out each section of text. Grammar, punctuation and spelling are fine, but the format needs work to make it look a lot neater.
Level of analysis
The aim is clearly stated which is good, and the method which is chosen is also explained well. No prediction is made which would have been good to see some research behind other published figures. The method is not explained very well and should be set out in clear steps arranged in bullet points to be able to follow the experiment easily. The candidate does consider certain steps which may confound the results which is good to see as it shows consideration to make sure the experiment is as reliable as possible. The candidate provides a good analysis and how to improve the experiment but should not rely on other groups results to formulate opinions as they were not there to see how the experiment went so the reliability of the information is questionable.
Response to question
A overall quite well done experiment. The candidate shows a lot of consideration for things that may have affected the experiment and accounts for it throughout which is rare to see at this level, they also provide some background knowledge. Calculations are missing which should be included so we can tell the reliability of them.