• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11

# An Investigation into the terminal velocity of steel ball bearings in Glycerol.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Nicholas Metzgen

## Physics A2 Coursework –

An Investigation into the terminal velocity of steel ball bearings in Glycerol

Hypothesis

In this experiment, I plan to investigate the relationship between velocity and viscosity, as this is something that has always interested me. I am going to carry out an experiment to find the terminal velocity of steel ball bearings in glycerol.

According to Stoke’s Law, spheres falling through a fluid exhibit the following relationship:

4/3 Π r² (ρ-σ) g  =  6 Π η r vt

Therefore:

vt  =  2 r² (ρ-σ) g

9 η

Where η is viscosity, σ is fluid density, ρ is sphere density, r is radius of the sphere and vt is the terminal velocity.

From this we can conclude that terminal velocity is proportional to radius².

Investigation

In this investigation there are several variables that will affect the final results. All the following variables have been considered and so, various precautions have been taken to minimise their influences.

Temperature – If the temperature increases, the viscosity of the liquid will decrease. As the volume of glycerol being used is sufficient enough that fluctuations in temperature will be minimal. However, as the experiment is being carried out over two weeks, I shall monitor the temperature closely.

Viscosity – The internal friction in the liquid (viscosity) will have to be constant throughout the experiment.

Middle

The micrometer was used to accurately measure the diameter of the steel ball bearings. The ball bearing was held above the glycerol and released. Once the ball bearing had fallen to the bottom they were retrieved by using a magnet on a length of thread.

The results were as follows:

 Size (mm dia) 9.4 t1 0.59 t2 0.56 t3 0.59 t4 0.54
 Size (MM dia) 6.34 t1 1.12 t2 1.09 t3 1.03 t4 1.12
 Size (MM dia) 3.18 t1 5.06 t2 4.9 t3 4.78 t4 4.81

The tables show the time taken in seconds for the ball to fall ten centimetres, over four different attempts. I had some other ball bearing, but they were much bigger and so fell much faster.

From these results I concluded that the ball bearings of radius 3.18 mm were to be used for the experiment. They travelled sufficiently slowly to be timed accurately and should also reach terminal velocity over a small distance.

The readings that were taken were used to calculate average time taken and average speeds for this experiment.

 Size (mm diameter) Average Time (s) Average Speed (m/s) 3.18 4.89 0.020460358 6.34 1.09 0.091743119 9.4 0.57 0.175438596

Other measurements were recorded to be used throughout the investigation. The density of the glycerol and ball bearings were determined. Weighing an empty glass beaker, and then measuring it again with 100ml of glycerol measured the density of the glycerol.

Problems

Conclusion

I carried out a few more experiments with different sized balls (similar diameter to 3.18 mm, as we have already stated that much bigger balls fall too fast to time accurately), so that we can draw a chart to show the relationship between terminal velocities and radius.

 Distance (m) 0-0.1 0.1-0.2 0.2-0.3 0.3-0.4 t(5.26 mm dia) (s) 1.26 1.32 1.38 1.61

 Distance (m) 0-0.1 0.1-0.2 0.2-0.3 0.3-0.4 t(2.19 mm dia) (s) 6.79 7.27 7.70 9.35

Conclusion

All the graphs show a linear trend line. So, if we count the average speed as the terminal velocity, we can show the following relationship.

 Radius (mm) 2.63 1.59 1.095 Terminal velocity (m/s) 0.74 0.27 0.13

If we look at the relationship between radius and terminal velocity, we can see that there is a definite correlation, as radius increases, terminal velocity increases.

My first prediction was that terminal velocity was proportional to radius squared.

This graph clearly shows a straight trend line that passes through the origin. This proves that the terminal velocity is directly proportional to the radius squared.

This theory was proven with a line of best fits, but it is clear from the graphs that the points lie above and below the line, which means that there are inaccuracies. The inaccuracies lie in the timing of the balls. If I were to do this experiment again, I would look at trying to make the readings more accurate.

Talk about experiments with varying temperature

Risk Assessment

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

1. ## Bouncing Ball Experiment

The more KE that the ball possessed as it hit the floor, the more that was transferred into elastic potential energy and back into KE. The more KE the ball leaves the floor with the longer it takes to stop due to the force of gravity and return back to the floor again.

2. ## The effect of the temperature on the viscosity of the syrup.

By doing this I was able to produce the following table: Distance (cm) Time (s) Velocity (ms-1) Acceleration (ms-2) 10 5.01 0.0199 10 9.10 0.0110 0.239 10 9.24 0.0108 0.233 10 10.0 0.01 0.199 10 10.1 9.90�10-3 0.195 10 10.2 9.80�10-3 0.191 10 11 9.10�10-3 0.164 10 11.1 9.01�10-3 0.162

1. ## Measuring the Viscosity of Honey

Explanation : each stop clock would be used to measure 4cm distance, the first would measure from the 1st point to the 2nd , once I stop the clock at the 2nd point, I start the other clock, and stop it at the 3rd point, and start the other, and so on.

2. ## Bouncing balls experiment.

= 39.24 ==> 39.24= 6.264 m/s Ping-pong: 0.2m 0.0045126 0.5 x 0.0023 = 3.924==> 3.924= 1.981 m/s 2.0m 0.045126 0.5 x 0.0023 =39.24==> 39.24= 6.264 m/s Air flow: 0.2 0.0251136 0.5 x 0.0128 =3.924 ==> 3.924= 1.981m/s 2.0 0.251136 0.5 x 0.0128 =39.24==> 39.24= 6.264 m/s Hockey: 0.2 0.253098 0.5

1. ## Practical investigation into Viscosity in liquids (Stokes Law).

taken for five various sized ball bearings to descend through engine oil. This allows me to investigate the affect of viscosity on the surface area of a ball bearing. The results are as follows. Ball bearing Time taken (s) to descend 1 metre through engine oil 1 2 3 Average

2. ## In this experiment I aim to find out how the force and mass affect ...

Air resistance acts on everything that moves through the air and is a force that opposes motion, i.e. it makes a moving body slow down. Some shapes result in less air resistance than others - a feather experiences much, and a coin very little.

1. ## Investigation into the effect of temperature on viscosity

Thermal energy loss may occur as when heated the honey immediately begins losing heat to its surroundings (and gaining heat, when cold, to return to room temperature) Effects like this must be taken into account, so that as the temperature at which the recording is made, is as near as possible to the temperature stated.

2. ## Approximate Stopping Distances

Gravel, grit and oil spills on the road disrupt the braking distance. The weight of the car is a large factor for the amount of distance covered until the vehicle comes to a stand still. The heavier the car the longer it will take to stop, but this is not

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to