• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Determination of Relative atomic mass of lithium

Extracts from this document...


Assessed Practical 3 Determination of Relative atomic mass of lithium Jared Ching Evaluation: In general the accuracy of the experiments was good. However with practice, the accuracy could be improved; accuracy being how close the results are to the real answer. I think I have carried pit the experiment as well as I possibly could at the time with the given conditions and time period allowed. I have gained precise results from the practical. However, looking back at the analysis section, the relative atomic mass values I found were not exactly 6.9 as presented in the periodic timetable. Method (1) gave me 8.28; a difference of 1.38 and method (2) gave me 7.37, a difference of 0.43 to the real/reference value. Therefore method (2) proved to be more accurate. Overall the results were good and came close to the real values. There were no anomalous results. Limitations: The main sources of error that I found to be evident and which were out of my control were as follows: * In method (1), due to the oil that lithium is stored in, not only ...read more.


I also found that the reacted solution sometimes returned to a slight pink colour even after turning completely colourless. Thus this caused inevitable error. Accuracy and reliability: In method (1) the procedure was very accurate; the equipment used is very accurate, however as mentioned before, the gas lost when replacing the bung caused a degree of inaccuracy. As shown by the results, with the relative atomic mass found to be +1.38 over. In method (2) not only were the results accurate but also precise. The final relative atomic mass coming out as only +0.43 over the reference value proves a high degree of accuracy. Looking at the results table, the three accurate titrations fall within 0.1cm3 and 0.3cm3 of each other, which is a very concurrent set of results. Clearly method (1) and method (2) differ in accuracy and precision. Method (1) is clearly less accurate and precise as the gas collected from the reaction of lithium and water was not exact as hydrogen was lost in the process. ...read more.


Due to the fact that the colour change and when to stop the tap is not very obvious, more indicator should be used in order to make the more subtle changes in colour more visible. The burette tap should be opened at full until there is a small change in colour, then the tap should be closed slightly so that only drops of acid are coming through, this will improve accuracy as it will be clearer when the reaction is complete, thus more concurrent results will be produced. Clearly there is also a need for a control, although it was initially thought that it was very obvious when the solution turns colourless, this practical has shown that a control would be useful to compare the colours. However the other problem of the solution returning to a slight pink colour can be eliminated by waiting for this to occur, and when it does, titrate it further opening the burette very slightly, allowing acid to be added more slowly into the solution. Carrying out titrations is a skill that develops with practice, more repetitions will lead to improved results, both in accuracy and precision. Both methods are the most accurate, considering the equipment available. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

  1. to determine the relative atomic mass of lithium. We will be doing this via ...

    Using equipment like syringes may make the procedure easier to use and more accurate depending on the scale divisions. Calculating percentage errors is a vital step in identifying the error margins and gives a very precise account of the accuracy of our results.

  2. Determine the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    If the chemical come in contact with the eye, immediately rinse the eye with water, and seek medical attention straight away. If the chemical is swallowed the drink plenty of water and seek medical attention straight away. If inhaled lithium hydroxide can cause severe irritation and corrosive tissue damage, similar to other strong bases.

  1. Determination of the Relative Atomic mass of Lithium

    on top of the conical flask, and during this time some hydrogen gas may have escaped, the extent of the gas loss depends on how close the bung was held to the flask, and also if there was any human error and for example the bung was dropped.

  2. Investigation to determine the relative atomic mass of lithium

    of lithium, then multiplying this by 100: Method 1 Accuracy = 7.1/6.9 x 100 = 102.8985507% = 2.89% error Method 2 Accuracy = 7.3/6.9 x 100 = 105.7971014 = 5.79% error Evaluation When comparing my resulst to the actual relative atomic mass of lithium I have shown that my reuslts

  1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    Number of moles The mass of lithium used in 100cm3 is 0.05g. So, the relative atomic mass of lithium = 0.05g 7.468 x 10-3 = 6.6952 Conclusion: The relative atomic mass of lithium is 6.70 EVALUATION I feel that overall the results of my experiment were fairly accurate.

  2. Determination of the relative atomic mass of Lithium

    Method Two Results Below I have processed the evidence from the evidence in a table and I have found the titres: Reading No. 1 2 3 Burette readings Initial (cm3) 0 0 0 Of HCl Final (cm3) 38.8 38.6 38.6 Volume used (Titre)/cm3 38.8 38.6 38.6 I found that because

  1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    I can see that the mass (m) is over the number of moles (n). This means I have to calculate the answer by using the mass over the number of moles. Mr = m n = 0.13 =6.96678 0.01866 As you can see I have filled the missing numbers with what they should be.

  2. To determine the relative atomic mass of Lithium

    I took the measurement of the hydrogen produced and it was exactly 190cm3. The remaining substance in the conical flask is Lithium Hydroxide, which I'll be using for the next way to find the relative atomic mass of Lithium. The balanced equation below shows the reaction between Lithium and distilled water.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work