• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

My experiment will be conducted to find out at what concentration does sodium thiosulphate with hydrochloric acid have the most reaction and how the concentration generally affects the rate of reaction.

Extracts from this document...


How does concentration affect rate of reaction? I am going to conduct an experiment on rate of reaction and how the concentration of sodium thiosulphate affects the rate of reaction. Several things such as temperature, ph and concentration can affect the rate of reaction. My experiment will be conducted to find out at what concentration does sodium thiosulphate with hydrochloric acid have the most reaction and how the concentration generally affects the rate of reaction. Particle size has a big impact on the speed of a reaction, if the particles are big then the reaction would be slow but if the particles are small the reaction will be fast. A catalyst often changes a reaction rate and they increase the speed of reaction always. The rate of reaction for this experiment will be measured by timing how long it takes for the sulphur from the sodium thiosulphate to cover an 'x' under a beaker. To test the rate of reaction and what affects it, we could have tested the effect of ph on rate of reaction, but that was not complicated enough. We used: * Sodium thiosulphate * Water * Hydrochloric acid Dilute sodium thiosulphate with water according to these measurements: Concentration HCL THIO H2O 100% 20ml 60ml 0ml 75% 20ml 45ml 15ml 50% 20ml 30ml 30ml 40% 20ml 24ml 36ml 25% 20ml 45ml 15ml How we carried out the investigation 1) Prepare equipment 2) Wear safety goggles, have cleaning equipment to clean acid if it spills and remember to take extra precautions not to break glass. ...read more.


Every time we washed the beaker there was water left in it. This could have diluted the THIO changing the accuracy of the results therefore we set up a system where we dried the beakers before using them for the final investigation. From the initial method results we can tell the more concentrated the THIO the faster the rate of reaction. This matches our prediction therefore seems to be accurate. The changes we made from the initial experience: * Keeping an eye on the temperature * introducing a new concentration * Decreasing the number of tries from 10 to 8. ( or else we would have time to replace outliers if we had any) * dedicated roles to each member then dried the beakers The Apparatus We used measuring cylinder to measure water, we used a 50ml one because we needed a maximum amount of water, of 36ml. It's easier to measure it with a smaller measuring cylinder because the scale is more detailed giving us precision in the amount we use. We used two 100ml capacity beakers to carry out our experiment because we would have mad 80ml maximum of solution in a beaker. Also the smaller the beaker the easier it is to see the 'X' sign if the beaker was bigger the 'X' becomes harder to see resulting in the member pressing the 'Stop' button on the stop watch later which would impact our result's precision. A Pasteur pipette was kept to measure the smaller amounts of water and THIO where 25ml and 36ml are necessary to be accurate. ...read more.


There are more collisions in a period of time which means there are more successful collisions. Increasing the concentration increases the number of particles in a given volume of solution, and so makes successful collisions more likely. If you keep increasing the concentration eventually it stops, because if there are enough HCl particles to collide with every THIO one; adding more will have a small or no change will occur. This explains what occurs at 100%, therefore there isn't a 100% difference between the 75% and 100% concentration. The trend shown is that as the input variable is decreased, concentration of sodium thiosulphate, the outcome variable increases; time taken for a reaction. Evaluating the data that you have collected In total, including the outliers, we collected 40 results which were sufficient to come to a conclusion. Most of the results were accurate however 3 of them were outliers and were excluded from the average. The results match my prediction and it has a negative correlation without any odd parts. There was no difficulty in drawing the line of best fit. This shows that my results are accurate. I think the three outliers should be repeated although this isn't particularly necessary because I had enough results to come to an average. My results have small error bars which show most of my results are accurate, but the 25% and 50% concentration are much bigger showing that these results could be replaced with more accurate ones. There were only minor issues with the results therefore I think it is sufficient to come to a conclusion. ?? ?? ?? ?? Amira Haque ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Patterns of Behaviour section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

The candidate has carried out a thorough investigation into the effects of concentration on reaction rates. They have used the results of their well planned experiment to come to a justified conclusion. Within their report they have included a justified ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The candidate has carried out a thorough investigation into the effects of concentration on reaction rates. They have used the results of their well planned experiment to come to a justified conclusion. Within their report they have included a justified hypothesis, analysis of results, and a conclusion and evaluation.

Level of analysis

The candidate has shown very good analysis skills, as they have collected data from a wide range of concentrations, investigated one interval (50%-25%) in greater depth after noticing an unexpected drop in reaction rate, and discussed in depth why they came to their original hypothesis, and therefore why concentration affects the reaction rate. They have suggested that they used mathematical techniques to analyse their data -for example claiming three of their results were outliers, however to prove this they should have included their calculations in the report. However, they have clearly used maths to find the average rate of reaction within the intervals tested, and claim to have put error bars on their graph in order to investigate the accuracy of their results (unfortunately the graph has not been included). These advanced techniques for analysing data would have gained them top marks. One area where they could have marginally improved their analysis is by explaining in more detail why concentration, or the other variables mentioned, affect the reaction rate by referring to collision theory - a higher concentration of reacting particles means that there would be a higher frequency of collisions; a catalyst would provide an alternative route for the reaction with a lower activation enthalpy, so more colliding particles would have greater that the activation enthalpy, leading to a higher frequency of successful collisions; a higher temperature would increase the frequency of collisions as the particles are moving around faster, and increase the energy of colliding particles, so these collisions are more likely to be successful. A more thorough analysis of these variables may be important to gain marks.
Occasionally they gave excuses as to why they chose not to investigate a different variable, which is unnecessary as the examiner should be aware that you have limited equipment, time, and skills. Excuses such as '[pH] was not complicated enough' are definitely not going to gain you any extra marks! If you feel you have to justify not doing an alternative experiment, reference to classroom equipment would be more suitable.
Despite these small issues, their analysis of the data is very good and should have gained them high marks.

Quality of writing

Their spelling, punctuation, and grammar are generally good throughout, with only minor errors. However, there is much room for improvement in the presentation of their report. Their method section should have contained a detailed, labelled diagram of the equipment, and several comments within it would have been better placed in a separate section on 'safety' or 'reducing uncertainties'. There are also odd, un-titled paragraphs discussing their hypothesis, changes made to the experiment after a preliminary experiment was carried out, and how they tried to reduce uncertainties in their measurements - all jumbled together. These should have been separated out and put under headings such as 'changes to the original experiment', 'reducing uncertainties' and 'hypothesis'. They have also neglected to include all their data - there is no data for (or real discussion of) their preliminary experiment, nor the raw data for their main experiment - only the averages are given. This information is vital in a real scientific report as it allows other scientists to analyse the data themselves to check the conclusions reached by the author, and so missing them out should have lost the candidate several marks.
However, they have tried to make their report easier to read by using bullet points and clear headings in bold font, which helps the reader (and the examiner) follow the experiment and find important sections quickly and easily.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by dragonkeeper13 17/07/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Patterns of Behaviour essays

  1. Investigating the rate of reaction between sodium thiosulphate and hydrochloric acid

    the higher the concentration, the quicker the reaction takes place. This is because, as previously illustrated with an annotated diagram, the higher the concentration the more particles there are which are available to react. As previously explained, not all particles have enough energy to be able to react, i.e.

  2. Rate of Reaction between Hydrochloric Acid and Sodium Thiosulphate.

    Another reason could have been contaminated equipment; although I washed out the beaker thoroughly after each experiment there may still have been a trace of acid, which could have affected the results.

  1. The effect of aspirin on the action of bovine liver catalase

    by the time taken. Table 4. The rate of reactions for different aspirin concentrations. Aspirin concentration (gdm� �) Rate of reaction (in terms of oxygen produced) (mm3 s-1) 0 2.62 2.42 2.51 2.42 2.51 2.62 5 2.09 2.17 2.09 2.24 2.24 2.09 10 1.90 1.96 1.80 1.96 1.80 1.85 15 1.70 1.70 1.75 1.65

  2. How does the concentration of sodium thiosulphate solution affect the rate of its reaction ...

    prevent accidents * Sodium and hydrochloric acid are irritant to the eyes but they are also slightly irritant to skin, so if I get any on me I will wash it off straight away. * During the reaction sulphur dioxide is given off, which is poisonous and can also cause

  1. Investigation to find out whether the concentration of sodium thiosulphate affects rate of reaction ...

    The calculations I used to reach my conclusion are working out the new molarity and taking the average out of two tests. Evaluation In my experiment there were a couple of parts that weren't exactly fair and accurate. Each time I shook the beaker, it may have not been the same vigorousness each time.

  2. How does temperature affect the rate of reaction between sodium thiosulphate and hydrochloric acid?

    This is why the decrease of reaction rate slows - it got increasingly difficult for the solution to get hotter. My results and evidence support my prediction very well. They prove the fact that temperature does affect the rate of reaction.

  1. Investigating the rate of reaction between hydrochloric acid and chalk.

    I think that I will be able to see this clearly in my results. I think that each time the over all amount of gas given off would be the same due to there being the same amount of Chalk each time.

  2. Investigating the Effect of Different Concentration Of Acid Rain On The Rate Of Reaction ...

    One of the other major causes of inaccuracy and unreliability in the experiment would have been human error. This affected my results in many ways. One of the most important difficulties was when I the readings of H2 released were taken, the time could have been wrong by 0.5 seconds and this would have caused a measurable inaccuracy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work