• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Synthesis of Iron (II) Sulphate FeSO4

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Anglo-Chinese School (Independent) Year 3IP Chemistry Coursework Tong Viet Anh (29) 3.18 Nathan 2008 YEAR 3 IP CHEMISTRY PROJECT Synthesis of Iron (II) Sulphate FeSO4 Friday, 18th July 2008 Tong Viet Anh 3.18 Nathan A. Aim To produce a pure and dry sample of Iron (II) Sulphate FeSO4 crystal B. Apparatus & Materials Apparatus: Chemical: 100ml Beaker (1) Distilled water Glass rod (1) Sulphuric acid 1 mol/dm3 (H2SO4) Spatula (1) Iron filings (Fe) Filter paper (3) Filter funnel (1) Evaporating dish (1) Bunsen burner (1) Tripods stand (1) Wire gauze (1) Lighter (1) Cloth (1) IR light (1) Plastic bag (1) Goggles C. Method (Reactions of acid and metals) 1. Wash up the beaker, evaporating dish, funnel and glass rod so as to remove as much unwanted particles as possible and get the purest crystals. 2. Measure 40 cm3 of dilute Sulphuric acid (H2SO4) and pour it into the beaker. 3. Warm the acid to speed up reaction. 4. Add Iron fillings (Fe) one spatula at a time, stirring until no more or little Iron fillings dissolves. ...read more.

Middle

Sulphate (FeSO4) - Therefore, the expected amount of Iron (II) Sulphate (FeSO4) formed when using 0.040 mol of Sulphuric acid (H2SO4) is 0.040 mol which means the expected amount if crystal is also 0.040 mol - The weight of the expected amount of Iron (II) Sulphate crystal (FeSO4) is: 0.040mol x (56 + 32 + 16x4)g/mol = 6.08g - Percentage yield is: E. Evaluation and Conclusion Evaluation of the experiment: - The synthesis was done with care taken when cleaning all the apparatus and carrying out all the transferring. This is to minimize the impure particles in the solution before let it evaporate and get the highest purity of the crystals. - Using the evaporating dish ensures that the crystals will be formed in a short amount of time compared to the plastic bottle. - The yield is calculated to be less than 100% due to various reasons. First, it is the loss of a certain amount of solution in every transferring (i.e. from the beaker to the funnel, from the funnel to the dish). Second, some crystals are overheated until anhydrate, resulting in turning into powder, which was not to be weighted. ...read more.

Conclusion

of this modification: * It shortens time taken to evaporate the solution since the solution after cooled down is put under IR light, with the heat from the light the evaporation occurs faster. * Avoid over heat when heating the solution. * Another way to store the solution when waiting for it to evaporate the water Instead of using evaporating dish, we can also use a plastic bottle to store the solution Advantage: using the plastic bottle gives out large size and well-formed crystal; while the evaporating dish, due to its large surface area, the solution spreads over on a large area and therefore the crystals obtained at last is most likely in a form of tiny rods. Limitation: this will obviously takes a longer time to get the desired product. F. Acknowledgements First and foremost, to my subject teacher, Ms. Angeline Chua, for her detailed and carefully prepared instruction. I cannot fully express my gratitude to the lab assistances for their generous assistance whenever I had any problems with my project For his tireless support in doing the project, I would like to acknowledge Le Viet Anh of class 4.17 Solomon. G. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

  1. How much Iron (II) in 100 grams of Spinach Oleracea?

    is known as the oxidation reaction and the reaction that involves a gain in electrons is known as a reduction reaction. In order to produce a titration involving Iron (II) Ammonium Sulphate (aq) it will be necessary to dissolve hydrated Iron (II)

  2. Osmosis Project

    If they do not meet these requirements the test will be unfair and the results may vary. - Stopwatch - A stopwatch is very important in this experiment because you need to know exactly when to weigh each carrot.

  1. The basic aim of this experiment is to determine the percentage concentration of Iron ...

    - Transfer the lawnsand into a mortar and grind the lawnsand until it is fine (if it is already fine, skip this stage) - Transfer the fine lawnsand into a 250-cm3 beaker; add distilled water until, approximately 100 cm3. - Wash both the weighing cup and the mortar and pestle

  2. A2 Chemistry -Assessed Practical In theory the remaining mass after the heating will be ...

    1.103125 x 10 = 0.01103125 mol Using this and the original mass we can calculate the Mr of the compound and deduce the number of H2O.

  1. the synthesis of azo dyes, aspirin and soap

    atoms, 8 H (hydrogen) atoms, and 4O (oxygen) atoms. Acetylsalicylic acid has two functional groups, the carboxylic acid group COOH and the MeCOOR ester group-(R is used as an abbreviation for an unspecified aliphatic or aromatic chain). The Reaction Mechanism The following diagram shows the reaction mechanism of the aspirin reaction.

  2. Determining the purity of Iron Wool.

    METHOD: 1.40g of iron wool sample weighted out on a digital balance using a weighting boat after balance reading had been put to zero. Using a measuring cylinder and collected 2.0M Sulphuric Acid (H2SO4) 75cm3 was measured out accurately and placed in a 250cm3 conical flask along with the weighted out sample of iron wool.

  1. The Estimation of Iron (II) and Iron (III) in a Mixture Containing Both.

    Equipment, apparatus and chemicals:- 1. 100cm3 of Fe2+ and Fe3+ solution 2. 50 cm3 of Potassium permanganate at 0.02M 3. 1.0 moldm-3 Sulphuric Acid 4. Zinc granules 5. Clamp and Boss 6. Burette 7. Burette funnel - white markings so that it is clearly viewable through the purple KMnO4 8.

  2. Venus Project.

    This is necessary so that we can find out which metal reacted most with the Sulphuric acid. The metal with the lowest percentage difference will be the best because it means it is the least reactive. Fair Test: In order to make this a fair test I will make sure

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work