Test three vinegars against the manufacturers’ to see who is diluting or ‘cheating’ on the vinegar.

Authors Avatar

Results

All results are measured in millilitres, ml.

Results of the method using pipettes, amount of alkali used to make solution neutral.

Results of the method using titration, amount of alkali used to make solution neutral.

Analysis

        The results differ greatly. The results from using the pipette method are all less than the results from using the burette method, except the ones from the manufacturers’ vinegar. I am going to plot the results onto a graph but I think that this experiment hasn’t succeeded its objective, as the results are so different.

Conclusion

        None of the shops contained the same amount of vinegar as the manufacturers’. All three shops had less vinegar in their samples, when tested by the pipette method. They had all been watered down. Adding water weakened the concentration of vinegar so that the samples contained less vinegar than expected, and therefore took less alkali, or sodium hydroxide to be neutralised. However, in the burette method, Chip shop B appeared to contain more vinegar than the manufacturers’. This leads me to believe that the experiment was unsuccessful, and that it wasn’t carried out correctly.

Join now!

        If my results are correct, then shops A and C are cheating on the vinegar, by watering it down, but shop B appears to have a stronger concentration of vinegar than the manufacturer, which is unlikely. In reality it is more likely that shop B was actually serving the correct concentration of vinegar, and that the experiment was incorrect. Overall shop A had the least amount of vinegar in. I think the burette method was a more accurate measurement than the pipette method, despite the anomalous results. This is because it is much easier to read off the measurement on ...

This is a preview of the whole essay