The reactions are negative because reactions are exothermic and in exothermic reactions, ΔH is always negative. I have decided on my prediction it would be “the higher the number of carbon atoms the higher the energy released” so this means there is a link between the number of carbon atoms in a fuel and the energy released. Consequently, since the alcohols of my choice ranges from methanol to octan-1-ol I also predict that “octan-1-ol would release energy the most among all the alcohols because it has the highest number of carbons and methanol would release energy the least because it has the least number of carbon atoms”.
Because I am burning alcohols, I will need to take some safety precautions, such as wearing safety goggles, tying any long hair back and possibly wearing protective gloves.
VARIABLES
There are certain variables that I need to control to make sure that the experiment is carried out in a fair way:
- Mass of water
- Length of wick on burner
- Type of alcohol
- Height of can above flame
- Type of can
In addition, the amount of water and how much the alcohol raises the water temperature must be controlled.
FAIRTEST
A fair test can only occur when I keep all the variables the same to ensure that the following must be kept in consideration. First the calorimeter the water is contained in must be the same shape because if it is not the flame may have more surface area of where to heat the water. The calorimeter must also be weighed before and after water has been placed in it so the actual mass of the water could easily be gotten. The alcohol must be weighed accurately with scales that weigh up to, at least, two decimal points. During weighing the spirit lamp must be covered to avoid an evaporation of the alcohol. The alcohol has to be weighed accurately before and after the experiment. The alcohol has to be blown out immediately when the water temperature has risen by 4 degrees. The thermometer must be swirled around the water before a reading can be taken; this insures that you are measuring the temperature of the whole water not just the bottom of the calorimeter, also, the final temperature before the temperature drops must be recorded. The shape of the spirit lamp must stay the same and so must the wick length. I will also ensure that the soot beneath the calorimeter be wiped out so it wouldn’t add to the loss of heat of the new experiment. But having kept all these variables into consideration I must emphasize that these doesn’t necessarily mean I would have accurate readings to get accurate readings I must write down exactly what I see without rounding them up until very necessary. Repeat experiments for about two to three times, so you can tell when there is something wrong with your experiment and to also avoid anomalous results.
APARRATUS:
- Spirit burner
-
Copper calorimeter
- Thermometer
- Stand, boss, clamp
- Lid the size of the calorimeter
- Stirring rod
- Electronic scale
- Tissue paper
- Protective hand gloves
- Safety goggles
MOLECULES EVOLVED
- METHANOL
- ETHANOL
- PROPAN-1-OL
- BUTAN-1-OL
- PENTAN-1-OL
- HEPTAN-1-OL
- HEXAN-1-OL
- OCTAN-1-OL
- CARBON DIOXIDE
- WATER
PROCEDURE:
- Weigh the spirit burner and the first alcohol together record measurement.
- Weigh the calorimeter alone and record measurement.
- Weigh the calorimeter and water together record measurement.
- Insert the thermometer in the calorimeter containing water and record initial temperature of the water.
- Mount the calorimeter with water on the clamp stand.
- Put the spirit burner containing alcohol directly under the calorimeter held by the clamp stand.
- Cover the calorimeter containing water.
- Insert the stirring rod and the thermometer in the holes for this purpose.
- Remove the cap of the spirit burner and then ignite immediately.
- Watch the thermometer while stirring the water.
-
Extinguish the fire once the thermometer has risen by 4°C.
- Then still watching the thermometer record the highest temperature.
- Then re-weigh the spirit burner with the remaining alcohol and record the measurement.
- Empty the calorimeter and wipe the soot on the surface.
- Repeat this procedure for the alcohols.
CHOOSEN ALCOHOLS AND CHEMICAL EQUATIONS
-
Methanol + Oxygen ⇒ Carbon dioxide + Water
-
2CH3OH + 3O2=> 2CO2 + 4H2O
-
Ethanol + Oxygen⇒ Carbon dioxide + Water
-
2C2H5OH + 6O2 => 4CO2 + 6H2O
-
Propan-1-ol + Oxygen ⇒ Carbon dioxide + Water
-
2C3H7OH + 9O2 => 6CO2 + 8H2O
-
Butan-1-ol + Oxygen ⇒ Carbon dioxide + Water
-
2C4H9OH + 12O2 => 8CO2 + 10H2O
-
Pentan-1-ol + Oxygen ⇒ Carbon dioxide + Water
-
2C5H11OH + 15O2 => 10CO2 + 12H2O
-
Hexan-1-ol + Oxygen ⇒ Carbon dioxide + Water
-
2C6H13OH + 18O2 => 12CO2 + 14H2O
-
Heptan-1-ol + Oxygen ⇒ Carbon dioxide + Water
-
2C7H15OH +21O2 => 14CO2 + 16H2O
-
Octan-1-ol+ Oxygen ⇒ Carbon dioxide + Water
-
2C8H17OH + 24O2 => 16CO2 + 18H2O
THE DIAGRAM OF MY EXPERIMENT
OBTAINING EVIDENCE
STRUCTURE OF FUELS AVAILABLE
METHANOL CH3OH
ETHANOL CH3CH2OH
PROPAN-1-OL CH3CH2CH2OH
BUTAN-1-OL CH3CH2CH2CH2OH
PENTAN-1-OL CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2OH
ANALISING AND CONSIDERING EVIDENCE
CALCULATIONS
HEAT EVOLVED IN EACH ALCOHOL
The formula to find the heat evolved is: (Rise in temperature × mass of water × 4.2) + (Rise in temperature × mass of calorimeter × specific heat of calorimeter)
The specific heat of copper calorimeter is = 0.385
1st attempt = (4.2×75.22×4.2) + (4.2×77.21×0.385)
1326.8808+124.84857
1451.72937joules.
2nd attempt = (5.0×75.30×4.2) + (5.0×77.21×0.385)
1581.3+148.62925
1729.92925joules.
3rd attempt = (5.6×74.93×4.2) + (5.6×77.21×0.385)
1762.3536+166.46476
1928.81836joules.
Heat evolved in ethanol
1st attempt = (4.8×76.33×4.2) + (4.8×77.21×0.385)
1538.8128+142.4808
1681.2936joules
2nd attempt = (5.2×75.15×4.2) + (5.2×77.21×0.385)
1641.276+154.57442
1795.85042joules
3rd attempt = (5.5×73.46×4.2) + (5.5×77.21×0.385)
1696.926+163.492175
1860.418175joules
Heat evolved in propan-1-ol
1st attempt = (4.7×75.15×4.2) + (4.7×77.21×0.385)
1483.461+ 118.9034
1602.3644joules
2nd attempt = (4.7×75.85×4.2) + (4.7×77.21×0.385)
1497.279+139.711495
1636.987495joules
3rd attempt = (5.3×75.99×4.2) + (5.3×77.21×0.385)
1691.5374+ 157.547005
1849.084405joules
Heat evolved in butan-1-ol
1st attempt = (6.1×61.79×4.2) + (6.1×80.08×0.385)
1583.0598+188.06788
1771.12768joules
2nd attempt = (5.8×73.80×4.2) + (5.8×80.08×0.385)
1797.768+178.81864
1976.58664joules
3rd attempt = (6.6×72.88×4.2) + (6.6×80.08×0.385)
2020.2336+203.48328
2223.71688joules
Heat evolved in petan-1-ol
1st attempt = (5.4×74.61×4.2) + (5.4×77.21×0.385)
1692.1548+160.51959
1852.63609joules
2nd attempt = (5.9×73.28×4.2) + (5.9×77.21×0.385)
1815.8784+175.382515
1991.260915joules
3rd attempt = (5.0×74.6×4.2) + (5.0×77.21×0.385)
1566.6+148.62925
1715.22925joules
CONVERTING HEAT EVOLVED IN ALCOHOL TO KILOJOULES PER MOLE
Formula to convert joules to kilojoules per moles = Heat evolved ×relative molecular mass
Mass of alcohol×1000
Methanol:
1st attempt = 1451.72937×32
0.32×1000
= 145.172937kj/mole
2nd attempt = 1729.92925×32
0.26×1000
= 212.91436923077kj/mole
3rd attempt = 1928.81836×32
0.28×1000
= 220.436384kj/mole
Average = 145.17+212.91+220.44
3
≅ 192.84kj/mole
Ethanol:
1st attempt = 1681.2936×46
0.22×1000
=351.5432073kj/mole
2nd attempt = 1795.85042×46
0.18×1000
=458.93955178kj/mole
3rd attempt = 1860.418175×46
0.17×1000
=503.407271kj/mole
Average = 351.54+458.94+503.41
3
≅437.54kj/mole
Propan-1-ol:
1st attempt = 1602.3644×60
0.13×1000
=739.5528kj/mole
2nd attempt = 1636.987495×60
0.20×1000
=491.0962485kj/mole
3rd attempt = 1849.084405×60
0.14×1000
=792.464745kj/mole
Average = 739.55+491.10+792.46
3
≅ 674.37kj/mole
Butan-1-ol:
1st attempt = 1771.12768×74
0.13×1000
=1008.180372kj/mole
2nd attempt = 1976.58664×74
0.21×1000
=696.51148267kj/mole
3rd attempt = 2223.71688×74
0.16×1000
=1028.469057kj/mole
Average = 1008.18+696.51+1028.47
3
≅ 911.05kj/mole
Pentan-1-ol:
1st attempt = 1852.63609×88
0.10×1000
=1630.3534632kj/mole
2nd attempt = 1991.260915×88
0.21×1000
=834.4331453kj/mole
3rd attempt = 1715.22925×88
0.14×1000
=1078.1441kj/mole
Average = 1630.35+834.43+1078.14
3
≅ 1180.97kj/mole
CONCLUSION
I have decided to choose one out of these multiple results I feel best fit to draw my graph. For ethanol, propan-1-ol, butan-1-ol and pentan-1-ol I have decided to use their averages and I have chosen the third attempt for methanol and the second attempt for ethanol. Below is the table for my graph. I have two graphs; one is a linear graph that shows the line of best fit and the other is a bar chart graph that shows the relationship between the carbon atoms and the energy they release.
After plotting the graph of the values above, there is a nice straight line on the graph. From the graph, my line of best fit started from the origin and touched nearly all the point through the graph; the ones that weren’t exactly on the line were very close to it. This also shows that when x= 0, y =0 because there is no carbon atom, there are no reactions if the rate of the chemical reaction is not changed. The graph is a linear graph because the number of carbon atoms is directly proportional to the energy released. Subsequently the bar chart also revealed just as much. I noticed that, when the number of carbon atoms doubled, it was twice as long as when was the carbon atoms halved. This means that a pattern formed in the way they increased. The approximate differences between the energy released in all alcohols from the first to the last are as follows respectively: from the graph below, x1 = 217, x2 = 237, x3 = 237, x4 = 269. The average of all of them is 240.
I predicted that “the higher the number of carbon atoms the higher the energy released” and “octan-1-ol would release energy the most among all the alcohols because it has the highest number of carbons and methanol would release energy the least because it has the least number of carbon atoms”. However, since the alcohols given to I ranged from methanol to pentan-1-ol so it is obvious that my prediction meant that pentan-1-ol would release more energy if it were the one with the most carbon atoms present. Therefore, my prediction was definitely correct because pentan-1-ol actually released energy the most. If the amount of the total energy required breaking bonds is more than the total amount required forming bonds then the excess energy is given out as heat and from pages three and four this is exactly what the calculation showed. When there are more carbon atoms present, there are also more bonds. For instance, methanol has only one carbon atom it is being burnt five bonds has to be broken but this is not the same in ethanol, propan-1-ol, butan-1-ol, and pentan-1-ol. In fact, they all increase systematically. To burn ethanol, eight bonds need to be broken and for propan-1-ol eleven, for butan-1-ol fourteen, and lastly for pentan-1-ol seventeen. They all increased by three bonds this is as a result from the addition of one carbon atom and two hydrogen atoms and they increase in energy because more bonds are being broken.
In total, I can confidently say that there is definitely a link between the numbers of carbon atoms and the energy released which is “the higher the carbon atoms present, the higher the energy released”.
EVALUATION
This experiment could be improved if the following is but in consideration.
- Since the alcohol lights up, I can’t calculate or record the energy given out through light.
- I could not calculate the heat lost through convection in the air.
- I couldn’t calculate the heat transferred to the clamp, boss and stand.
- Although the windows were kept shut, I couldn’t stop people from moving around the laboratory so their movements create the artificial wind in the class. Heat is also lost through this wind.
- In higher temperatures, heat is lost faster.
- In the alcohols that have higher carbon, atoms experienced a lack of oxygen to react with, causing incomplete combustion in them.
- If the alcohol available for the wick to burn were not enough, then the wick would burn not the alcohol, which would give an inaccurate result.
- Although, I wanted all the alcohols to have the same length, width and type of wick, they were not the same. This could cause an inaccuracy of the results.
- During the experiment, it was difficult to extinguish the fire immediately it increased by four degrees C and this would mean a uniform extinguishing time was not established.
- The flame size changed due to the type of alcohol; hence, it was a different distance away from the beaker each time.
- Actually, the best way to carry out this experiment is to use a bomb calorimeter were the whole experiment is surrounded by water so the heat trying to escape goes directly into the water without escaping into the atmosphere.
I could also say that so far so good my experiment has gone very well despite the fact that I couldn’t calculate the heat lost from the above. I have a nice straight graph and no anomalous results, which is brilliant. I think these results came out well because the heat loss actually happened to all the experiments I carried out.
In addition, the results are in the least reliable because there was too much heat loss. From my hypothesis, I tried calculating the energy released for each of the alcohols I planned to use and not surprisingly, the results were five times bigger than my initial results. Consequently, I went in search of results in a data book and the results I got for methanol to hexan-1-ol are as follows respectively: 715, 1371, 2010, 2673, 3323 and 3976 joules/mol-. The results also where 3 times larger than the results I got which proves that this method is a very crude way of checking out the energy released in alcohols. Then I went further to calculate the difference in the values I collected from the data book and the average difference were 652.2 while my average was 240. There is nearly three times difference between them. I also took the percentage difference of all of them and the were as follows from methanol to pentan-1-ol respectively: 69%, 68%, 66% 65%, and 64% with a total average of 66.4% this also tells me that nearly 70% of the energy released was actually lost out of the experiment from one means or another which I have listed above. This also shows my results are not reliable at all.
Despite all the deficiencies in the results, my result will still says the same thing the results in the data book we says because they are affected by the same things, so they will reduce in the same way. They both proved that the higher the higher the number of atoms the higher the energy released so there surely in a link between the number of atoms and the energy released.