ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
Whereas CFCs are safe to use in most applications and are inert in the lower atmosphere, they do undergo significant reaction in the upper atmosphere or stratosphere. In 1974, two University of California chemists, who won Nobel prizes for there work: Professor F. Sherwood Rowland and Dr. Mario Molina, showed that the CFCs could be a major source of inorganic chlorine in the stratosphere following their photolytic decomposition by UV radiation. CFCs have been associated with the accelerated depletion of ozone in the Earth's stratosphere. CFCs take part in catalytic reactions in the stratosphere. A catalytic cycle is a series of reactions in which a chemical family or a particular species is depleted, leaving the catalyst unaffected. The odd-oxygen family, for example, is composed of ozone (O3) and atomic oxygen (O). In the presence of a chlorine atom, the net result is the conversion of an oxygen atom and ozone molecule to two molecules of molecular oxygen (O2). Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) themselves are not involved in the catalytic process; upon reaching the stratosphere, they are subject to higher levels of ultraviolet radiation that decompose the CFC and release atomic chlorine. This new formed free radical is what catalyses the reaction. Equation one shows the free radical chlorine being formed
Equation one: CF 2 Cl 2 ==> CF 2 Cl + Cl.
Equation two: Cl + O3 ==> ClO + O2 Equation three: ClO + O ==> Cl + O2
The two above reactions result in: O3 + O ===> 2O2
Chlorine (Cl) is initially removed by reaction with ozone (O3) to form chlorine monoxide (ClO) in the second equation, The chlorine is regenerated through reaction of ClO with an oxygen atom (O) in the third equation. The net result of the two reactions is the depletion of ozone and atomic oxygen into oxygen molecules. A loss of stratospheric ozone results in more harmful UV-B radiation reaching the Earth's surface which is armful to plants and animals.100, 000 molecules of ozone can be destroyed per chlorine atom.
As well as depleting ozone, CFCs also act as greenhouse gases. With more greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, the natural greenhouse effect is being enhanced artificially, and this could bring about global warming. Increased concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere enhance the earth's natural greenhouse effect by trapping a greater proportion of the infrared energy (or radiation) that is leaving the Earth. This is called climate forcing and causes a temperature rise at the Earth's surface.
Amount in the earth’s atmosphere:
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: In 1987, 27 nations signed a global environmental treaty, the Montreal Protocol to Reduce Substances that deplete the Ozone Layer. The treaty had a provision to reduce 1986 production levels of these compounds by 50% before the year 2000. This international agreement included restrictions on production of CFC-11, -12, -113, -114, and 115. An amendment approved in London in 1990 was more forceful and called for the elimination of production by the year 2000. The environmental concern for CFCs follows from their long atmospheric lifetime (55 years for CFC-11 and 140 years for CFC-12, CCl2F2) which limits our ability to reduce their abundance in the atmosphere and associated future ozone loss. This resulted in the Copenhagen Amendment that further limited production and was approved later in 1992. The manufacture of these chemicals ended for the most part on January 1, 1996. The only exceptions approved were for production within developing countries and for some exempted applications in medicine (i.e., asthma inhalators) and research. Economic and trade penalties were applied should any of the148 signatory countries trade or produce these banned chemicals.
Levels of CFCs in the atmosphere are now decreasing due to this.
Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) still contain chlorine atoms, but the presence of hydrogen makes them reactive with chemical species in the troposphere. This greatly reduces the prospects of the chlorine reaching the stratosphere, as chemical processes in the lower atmosphere will remove chlorine. Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), potential replacements for CFCs that contain no chlorine, but they have been evaluated for potential effects of fluorine compounds on ozone destruction.
MY VIEWS:
I think the elimination of CFCs was the only way to go after its affect on atmosphere. Although replacement products such as HFCs may not be as efficient or as inexpensive to produce they are safer in the long run. I believe that further development and research will eventually lead to the production of a replacement for CFCs that’s just as effective and with all the good qualities and less of the hazards ones. HFCs are the first step but because they still contain fluorine which shares many of chlorine’s properties it could still be dangers so safer alternatives need to be developed. CFCs were thought of as miracle substances for over 50 years and they are miracle substances but they are also dangerous. There have been accusations that Ozone depletion has been greatly exaggerated to serve politics and that some chemicals may not effect the ozone to the extent that federal scientist claim. These accusations were discredited rightly so I think because even if the chemicals only effected the ozone a little bit it will all add up after time and even though we might not suffer for it now. Our children’ children are sure to face the consequences of our ignorance if we didn’t do anything about ozone depletion.
CFCs concentration in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere
BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Chemistry in context text book
- Green house affect leaflet from Library
- www. cszinc. com/industrial
BY Shirley Namubiru
CHLOROFLUOROCARBON
BY SHIRLEY NAMUBIRU