• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss Free Speech in China Compared to the UK

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Freedom of speech is defined as, ?the right to express any opinion in public without censorship or restraint by the government?, and Article 35 of the Chinese constitution promises the right to "freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration." (China.org, 1982) I am going to explore this question focusing solely on how governmental censorship of the internet and media limits free speech for people in China today, and the impact that this has. Although there are many other aspects of this broad topic, namely Tibetan protests, I cannot explore them all in such a short discussion. I will then analyze freedom of speech comparatively to the United Kingdom, and show that although freedom of speech is welcomed there are still restrictions, as there are in any country, and the ramifications are frequently negative. I will argue how I believe that the degree of freedom of speech for people in China is dependent on their demographic and job. I will also argue how restricting freedom of speech is not necessarily a sinister objective. Therefore, although there are limits on freedom of speech for people in China today, these limitations are only felt by particular segments of society at a time, and have been shown to have positive consequences comparatively. To begin, there are over 1 billion people in China, 384 million of whom were internet users by 2009 (Xiao, 2011), primarily those in urban China. Freedom of speech via the internet has many limitations, as I will explain. Censorship has been defined as, ?the act of changing or suppressing speech or writing that is considered subversive of the common good.? The ?Great Firewall of China? is a well-known, sophisticated filtration system that has been in place since 1995 when the internet first became commercially available to people in China. The rules that have been created from 1995 to the present have been implemented to control and supervise nearly all aspects of the internet. ...read more.


It is compulsory to have a license, which is granted by the state, and so not adhering to these rules can lead to licenses being revoked by the Central Propaganda Department, the main regulatory body. In the same way, they can shut down media websites if they feel that the publishing is somehow damaging to China in any way, for example in 2012, Bloomberg and New York Times were blacked out because they ran stories on the personal wealth of Xi Jinping and Wenjaboo (Council on Foreign Relations, 2013). It is journalists, however, who arguably have their freedom of speech oppressed the most. For example, journalists will not be paid until their work has been checked and published which acts as a huge disincentive to not follow the ?main melody? of the party. In addition, journalists can face reprisals at work, fines and imprisonment, with Reporters Without Borders estimating that in 2011 alone 27 journalists were imprisoned, one being Tan Zuoren who was ?sentenced to 5 years imprisonment for drawing attention to government corruption and poor construction of schools after the 2008 earthquake in Sichuan province? (Council on Foreign Relations, 2013). For the CCP, media is the ?mouthpiece of the party? (Xiao, 2011) and is there to propagate positive views of the party. For example, there are often photos and videos of party officials shaking hands, and news comparing the growth of their economy with other countries, particularly the west. At the same time, the CCP selectively chooses which negative press to block or allow, so as to not create social unrest, although this too limits the news that journalists are able to cover. If we take the Tiananmen Square massacre of 1989, for example, media coverage and access to internet information was essentially banned, meaning that neither journalists or ordinary citizens could voice their opinions or find out more information regarding the incident. ...read more.


For these reasons, I believe that the controls and measures put in place by the CCP to minimize freedom of speech work in favour of both the people and themselves. It is also true that this increased freedom of speech does not necessarily lead to greater democracy or unrestricted human rights; therefore, even though Western society may enjoy greater freedom of speech, the CCP?s implementation of such restrictions has so far been successful in creating political and social stability. When considering how much freedom of speech people in China have, it is clear that they have less freedoms than those in the UK, but it begs the question whether even political activists in China would opt for a system where society is unstable and frequently hostile. To conclude, the aforementioned points outline the degree to which I believe people in China have freedom of speech. I believe that the internet and the media are the greatest limitations to the free speech of Chinese people, and comparatively to the UK, Chinese people have far less freedom of speech. However, as I have also outlined, the impact that this has on freedom of speech is not as great as it may appear; the affects are mainly felt by metropolitan people. There are still many people in China that do not have access to the internet, media legislation only affects a small, working minority, and comparatively other countries have not seen political or social stability through executing their freedom of speech. In any case, freedom of speech is limited in all countries, but in a much more subtle way. The Chinese Communist Party are trying to stabilize their country and keep the citizens happy which, I believe, has taken place. For these reasons I have spoken about in my short discussion, I believe that the breakdown of freedom of speech, although existing, only impacts particular segments of society at a time and overall consequences have been positive; it would be false to say that people in China today have no freedom of speech. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Anthropology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Anthropology essays

  1. In Search of Respect Chapter 3 Handout

    - over the years he would "systematically extract higher and higher profit margins from his problematic workers...he knew how to discipline his workforce firmly without overstepping culturally defined rules of mutual respect" (82) Managers-Primo and Tony * The role of the managers, Prime and Tony, was essentially to ensure that

  2. While each Greek meal is fresh and inviting, it is also a trip back ...

    For male friend, slapping each other's arm is more common. Body language is also very important in Greek culture. Nodding your head is considered impolite in Greek culture. Therefore, a verbal "yes" is the appropriate thing to do. It is also impolite to make the "O.K."

  1. Speech on Women's Rights in the 1800s

    Women felt withdrawn by men in the fact that they could not learn. Women were finally allowed to learn and this is again because they fought for their rights. In the 1800s women kept finding more success and kept pressing themselves for more quality and freedom.

  2. How do Biblical teachings affect Christians behavior and attitudes?

    reference to Figure 1 that the Christian denominations listed below have a lower percentage than the 34% divorce rate of Non-denomination couples. BARNA REPORT: VARIATION IN DIVORCE RATES AMONG CHRISTIAN FAITH GROUPS Denomination (in order of decreasing divorce rate) Divorce Rate Non Denomination 34% Baptists 29% Protestants 25% Catholics 21%

  1. Discussion of the article "Home of the Roma Kings", in the September 2012 issue ...

    (O?Neill 138). They believe that there is always something better that they need to own. One gypsy man was quoted saying, ?If we see something beautiful we want something even more beautiful." (O?Neill 139). For example, one man built the first multi-million dollar house in the gypsy community, but his

  2. Indian Society Essays - Corruption, Linguistic Rights and a review of "The Palace of ...

    The lure of money has stayed glittering for ages. But now is the time to change. And instrumental in this change shall be the children of India, the future of our nation. It is not easy to step away from the known into the unknown. Following a dream requires courage and the strength to deal with failure.

  1. I will argue that Canada should continue to develop some regulations to protect its ...

    regard to American culture, with direct attempts at the Canadian market or the general diffusion of American culture in the globalized media arena. Thus the people of Canada are influenced heavily by American culture and are surrounded more by their culture.


    One?s quality of life increases, female vulnerability to ill health, frequent unplanned pregnancy is reduced, and the chance for contracting HIV/AIDS infection is also reduced. Education improves the overall quality of The Bahamas: - the ?quality of a nation is easily judged by the number of liberate population living in it?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work