Ben & Jerry’s Case Analysis

Facing their first ever net income loss and experiencing a disconnect between company strategy, it is necessary to compare Ben & Jerry’s to Michael Porter’s “Five Forces” model to obtain guidance and a clear perspective on what path their new CEO Robert Holland should take the company.        Ben & Jerry’s operational effectiveness was not successful in that they were inefficient in managing operational activities. The high cost of distribution, significant delays in opening a new manufacturing plant with a $6.8 million write-down, producing the large chunk ice cream, and difficulty forecasting demand for ice cream flavors all contributed to the company’s first profit loss in 1994. Porter states that cost advantages arise from performing company activities more efficiently than competitors and Ben & Jerry’s ineffectiveness to do this was causing a decrease in profit and increase in debt. Resolving the company’s costly equipment problems was one of Robert Holland’s top priorities when becoming the new CEO.

Join now!

        Another top priority was to focus on Ben & Jerry’s unique activities as a key success factor to gain competitive advantage over their competitors. For example, their corporate strategy to integrate product quality with social responsibility is a key factor in the successful operation of the company. Ben & Jerry’s have used a variety-based positioning strategy to pinpoint a specific customer base who are interested in the environment and are willing to pay a premium price for higher quality.

        Ben & Jerry’s disconnect with their growth strategies and equipment problems cost the company huge profits. Ben & Jerry’s was first ...

This is a preview of the whole essay