Do newspapers have a future in the digital era? Drawing on examples, explain the strategies for change and survival adopted in different sectors of the British Press.

Authors Avatar

Why and How Are Some Events Interpreted by the News Media as Threats to Societal Values and Norms?

Why and How Are Some Events Interpreted by the News Media as Threats to Societal Values and Norms?

It is not uncommon for news media to manipulate stories or events to cause a reaction from their audience. Often using exaggeration, or even mass coverage, the news media can influence the way that the news is perceived and received by the listeners. Sometimes the threat can appear so strong towards society, that it can cause panic throughout a nation.

There are many reasons as to why events are interpreted as threats. Arguably the main reason is because bad news sells. The worse the news, the more coverage it will receive within the media, for example the event of 9/11, even years after still is repeated with the mention of new acts of “terrorism”. The American Paper, The Economic Times stated that the American Secretary of State had said “Mumbai terror attacks pose before India the same challenge that the US faced after the 9/11 – how to prevent it happening again”. The Mumbai attacks however, are not related to the US 9/11 attacks, with the exception of it being a terror-induced attack.

This is suggestive of the way that news media in different countries target their audience. The issue must be relevant to the society to cause a reaction. A lot of American families are still suffering from the 9/11 attacks, and the proposed threat of terrorism is still considered a panic issue in the states.

Likewise, Not all papers however, deal with news stories in the same way. Low-market tabloids are well renown for delivering news in a far more sensationalist way, than broadsheets. Studies suggest that people who read papers such as the Sun or Star are more likely to be affected by media-induced moral panics, than people who read the Independent or the Times. Again, this use of sensationalism is to sell the papers. In the case of Shannon Matthews, the Sun’s front-page headline when the event first occurred read, “Shannon’s Mum is Benefit Fiddler”, whereas The Independent took a diplomatic, arguably more informative, approach “Shannon Matthews Case; Five Fathers, One Mother and a Muddled Family Saga”.

Join now!

Another way in which the news media can interpret and extend the life of a news story is to make them relevant to whatever social insecurities that they can. The Shannon Matthews’ Abduction has had three notable “spins” on the original event. The first “spin” revolving around benefit’s fiends, or people who deliberately have children too claim benefits. The other two spins have been Shannon being “drugged” has caused up-roar and her mother to be charged for acts of child neglect. Finally BBC Radio 1 news stated, “The social services had already visited the Matthew’s household a year before ...

This is a preview of the whole essay